Advertisement

Monitoring Invasive and Threatened Aquatic Amphibians, Mammals, and Birds

  • Jim Shields
  • Lana M. Austin
Chapter

Abstract

Native aquatic wildlife species are declining within their natural range worldwide. Simultaneously, invasive species now dominate many aquatic landscapes in most parts of the world. Both groups require effective and accurate monitoring to guide management actions. This chapter offers background information on the issues surrounding monitoring of threatened and invasive species in aquatic environments—with a focus on amphibians, otters, American mink, muskrats, nutria, waterfowl, and other aquatic birds. Present-day human and passive monitoring techniques are reviewed in regard to efficacy, accuracy, and resource intensity. Current and potential applications of detection dogs for these aquatic wildlife groups, as either stand-alone or supplementary monitoring techniques, are considered. Examples of known related uses of dogs are provided, and potential future applications for detection dogs are highlighted.

Keywords

Dog Detection Otter American mink Scat detection Amphibian declines Cryptic species Muskrat Nutria Waterfowl Bittern Track detection Invasive Aquatic invasive species (AIS) Endangered 

Notes

Water is fun. You can play in it, drink it, swim in it.

Alonah Warrior, age 11

References

  1. Amundsen, T., Sundstrøm, S., Buvik, T., Gederaas, O. A., & Haaverstad, R. (2013). Can dogs smell lung cancer? First study using exhaled breath and urine screening in unselected patients with suspected lung cancer. Acta Oncologica, 53, 307–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barata, I. M., Griffiths, R. A., & Ridout, M. S. (2017). The power of monitoring: Optimizing survey designs to detect occupancy changes in a rare amphibian population. Scientific Reports, 7, 16491.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16534-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, K. (1972). Muskrats in central Europe and their control (1972). Proceedings of the 5th Vertebrate Pest conference, p. 6. Available at http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/vpc5/6. Accessed 17 Dec 2017.
  4. Berger, L., Speare, R., & Kent, A. (2000). Diagnosis of chytridiomycosis in amphibians by histologic examination. Zoo’s Print Journal, 15, 184–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BirdLife International. (2017). Species factsheet: Rhodonessa caryophyllacea. Available at http://www.birdlife.org. Accessed 12 Dec 2017.
  6. Bonesi, L., & Palazon, S. (2007). The American mink in Europe: Status, impacts, and control. Biological Conservation, 134, 470–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bos, D., & Ydenberg, R. (2011). Evaluation of alternative management strategies of muskrat Ondatra zibethicus population control using a population model. Wildlife Biology, 17, 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brack Egg, A. (1978). Situacion actual de las nutrias (Lutrinae: Mustelidae) en el Peru. In N. Duplaix (Ed.), Otters: Proceedings of the first working meeting of the otter specialist group (pp. 76–84). Morges: International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.Google Scholar
  9. Browne, C., Stafford, K., & Fordham, R. (2006). The use of scent-detection dogs. Irish Veterinary Journal, 59, 97.Google Scholar
  10. Brzeziński, M., Romanowski, J., Żmihorski, M., & Karpowicz, K. (2010). Muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus) decline after the expansion of American mink (Neovison vison) in Poland. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 56, 341–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bucher, E. H. (1992). The causes of extinction of the passenger pigeon. In D. M. Power (Ed.), Current ornithology (Vol. 9). Boston: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Carter, J. (2016). Dog and Mink team capture muskrat. Available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6M5Og41hTo. Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
  13. Cassola, F. (2016). Ondatra zibethicus. The IUCN red list of threatened species 2016: e.T15324A22344525. Available at  https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T15324A22344525.en. Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
  14. Chadès, I., McDonald-Madden, E., McCarthy, M. A., Wintle, B., Linkie, M., & Possingham, H. P. (2008). When to stop managing or surveying cryptic threatened species. PNAS, 105, 13939–13940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Channin, P. R. F., & Jefferies, D. J. (1978). The decline of the otter Lutra lutra L. in Britain: An analysis of hunting records and discussion of causes. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 10, 305–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clemann, N., Scroggie, M., & Lumsden, L. (2011). Survey standards: Giant Burrowing frog, Heleioporus australiacus. The Department of Sustainability and Environment. Available at https://www.forestsandreserves.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0026/29267/4-Giant-Burrowing-Frog-Survey-Standards-FINALv1.0_2MAY11.pdf. Accessed 22 Dec 2017.
  17. Cole, G. A. (1978). The textbook of limnology. Saint Louis, Missouri: C.V. Mosby.Google Scholar
  18. Conservancies. (2017). Available at www.conservancies.org/Downloads/Giant%20Bullfrog.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
  19. Cornu, J. N., Cancel-Tassin, G., Ondet, V., Girardet, C., & Cussenot, O. (2011). Olfactory detection of prostate cancer by dogs sniffing urine: A step forward in early diagnosis. European Urology, 59, 197–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Craik, C. (1997). Long-term effects of North American mink Mustela vison on seabirds in western Scotland. Bird Study, 44, 303–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Daszak, P., Berger, L., Cunningham, A. A., Hyatt, A. D., Green, D. E., & Speare, R. (1999). Emerging infectious diseases and amphibian population declines. Emerging Infectious Disease, 5, 735–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Davis, E. F., Anderson, C. B., Valensuela, A. E. J., Cabello, J. L., & Soto, N. (2012). American mink (Neovison vison) trapping in the Cape Horn Biosphere Reserve: Enhancing current trap systems to control an invasive predator. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 49, 18–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Day, A. M. (1949). North American waterfowl (363 pp.). Harrisburg: The Stackpole Co.Google Scholar
  24. Du Preez, L. H., & Cook, C. L. (2004). Pyxicephalus adspersus Tschudi, 1838. In L. R. Minter, M. Burger, J. A. Harrison, H. H. Braack, P. J. Bishop, & D. Kloepfer (Eds.), Atlas and red data book of the frogs of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland, SI/MAD series (Vol. #9, pp. 300–303). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
  25. Elia, G., Decaro, N., Martella, V., Cirone, F., Lucente, M. S., & Lorusso, E. (2006). Detection of canine distemper virus in dogs by real time RT-PCR. Journal of Virological Methods, 136, 171–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Elmberg, J., Berg, C., Lerner, H., Waldenström, J., & Hessel, R. (2017). Potential disease transmission from wild geese and swans to livestock, poultry, and humans: A review of the scientific literature from a One Health perspective. Infection, Ecology & Epidemiology, 7, 1300450.  https://doi.org/10.1080/20008686.2017.1300450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ericson, P. G. P., Qu, Y., Blom, M. P. K., Johansson, U. S., & Irestedt, M. (2017). A genomic perspective of the pink-headed duck Rhodonessa caryophyllacea suggests a long history of low effective population size. Scientific Reports, 7, 16853.  https://doi.org/10.1034/s471598-017-16975-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Feldhamer, G. A., Thompson, B. C., & Chapman, J. A. (2003). Wild mammals of North America. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Fox, A. D., Ebbinge, B. S., Mitchell, C., et al. (2010). Current estimates of goose population sizes in Western Europe, a gap analysis and an assessment of trends. Ornis Svecica, 20, 115–121.Google Scholar
  30. Fuller, A. K., Sutherland, C. S., Royle, J. A., & Hare, M. P. (2016). Estimating population density and connectivity of American mink using spatial capture-recapture. Ecological Applications, 26, 1125–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gower, D. J., & Wilkinson, M. (2005). Conservation biology of Caecilian amphibians. Conservation Biology, 19(1), 45–55.Google Scholar
  32. Greco, J. (2001). North woods animal track guide. Weverton: North Woods Enterprises. ISBN-10: 0970929404.Google Scholar
  33. Green, A. J. (1996). Analyses of globally threatened Anatidae in relation to threats, distribution, migration patterns, and habitat use. Conservation Biology, 10, 1435–1445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gsell, A., Innes, J., de Monchy, P., & Brunton, D. (2010). The success of using trained dogs to locate sparse rodents in pest-free sanctuaries. Wildlife Research, 37, 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Halle, S., & Pelz, H. J. (1990). On the efficiency of muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus) control from trapping data ascertained in Bremen. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Zoologie. ISSN: 0044–2291.Google Scholar
  36. Harrington, L. A., Harrington, A. L., Hughes, J., Stirling, D., & Macdonald, D. W. (2010). The accuracy of scat identification in distribution surveys: American mink, Neovison vison, in the northern highlands of Scotland. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 56, 377–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Heather, B., & Robertson, H. (2015). The field guide to the birds of New Zealand. Auckland: Penguin Random House New Zealand.Google Scholar
  38. Hero, J. M., Gillespie, G., Robertson, P., Littlejohn, M., & Lemckert, F. (2004). Philoria frosti. The IUCN red list of threatened species 2004. Available at e.T16997A6695616.  https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2004.RLTS.T16997A6695616.en. Accessed 16 Dec 2017.
  39. Hersteinsson, P. (1999). Methods to eradicate the American mink (Mustela vison) in Iceland. Workshop on the control and eradication of non-native terrestrial vertebrates, Report to the Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  40. Hollis, G. J. (2004). Ecology and conservation biology of the Baw Baw frog Philoria frosti (Anura: Myobatrachidae): Distribution, abundance, autoecology and demography. PhD thesis, Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  41. IUCN Otter Specialist Group. (2015). The 13 species of Otter. Available at http://www.otterspecialistgroup.org/Species.html. Accessed 17 Dec 2017.
  42. Janecka, J. E., Jackson, R., Yuquang, Z., Diqiang, L., Munkhtsog, B., Buckley-Beason, V., & Murphy, W. J. (2008). Population monitoring of snow leopards using noninvasive collection of scat samples: A pilot study. Animal Conservation, 11, 401–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jefferies, D. J. (1989). The changing otter population of Britain 1700–1989. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 38, 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lane, C., Tameru, B., Nganwa, D., Habtemariam, T., Asseged, B., Robnett, V., & Wilson, S. (2010). A quantitative risk assessment for the likelihood of introduction of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus strain H5N1 into the U.S. hunter retriever dogs. Avian Diseases, 54, 699–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lester, K. M. (1956). Historic couture. A résumé of the characteristic types of costume from the most remote times to the present day. Peoria: Chas. A. Bennett Publishers.Google Scholar
  46. Mackenzie, D. I., Nichols, J. D., Lachman, G. B., Droege, S., Royle, J. A., & Langtimm, C. A. (2002). Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology, 83, 2248–2255.Google Scholar
  47. Malone, B. S. (1985). Status, distribution and ecology of the Baw Baw frog (Philoria frosti). Technical report, series no. 36, Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Victoria.Google Scholar
  48. Manchester Guardian. (1912). 100 years ago: The cruelty of the otter hunt. The Guardian. [online]. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/aug/26/country-diary-1912-otter-hunting. Accessed 17 Dec 2017.
  49. Matless, D., Merchant, P., & Watkins, C. (2005). Animal landscapes: Otters and wildfowl in England 1945–1970. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30, 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Matthew, E. E. (2016). The use of a sniffer dog for amphibian conservation ecology. Dissertation thesis, North-west University, Washington, DC. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/10394/18954. Accessed 17 Dec 2017.
  51. McCabe, T. R., & Elison, G. (1986). An efficient live-capture technique for muskrats. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 14, 282–284.Google Scholar
  52. McCallum, H. (2005). Inconclusiveness of Chytridiomycosis as the agent in widespread frog declines. Conservation Biology, 19, 1421–1430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McClelland, P. J. (2011). Campbell Island – Pushing the boundaries of rat eradications. In C. R. Veitch, M. N. Clout, & D. R. Towns (Eds.), Island invasives: Eradication and management (pp. 204–207). Gland: IUCN.Google Scholar
  54. Measey, G. J., Gower, D. J., Oommen, O. V., & Wilkinson, M. (2003). A mark-recapture study of the caecilian amphibian Gegeneophis ramaswami (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Caeciliidae) in Southern India. Journal of Zoology London, 2361, 129–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Miller, J. E. (1974). Muskrat control and damage prevention. Proceedings of the 6th Vertebrate Pest Conference. 31. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/vpc6/31
  56. Monterroso, P., Castro, D., Silva, T. L., Ferreras, P., Godinho, R., & Alves, P. C. (2013). Factors affecting the (in)accuracy of mammalian mesocarnivore scat identification in South-western Europe. Journal of Zoology, 289, 243–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Moore, N. P., Roy, S. S., & Helyar, A. (2003). Mink (Mustela vison) eradication to protect ground-nesting birds in the Western Isles, Scotland, United Kingdom. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 30, 443–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. National Association for Regional Game Council. (2015). Mink and grey squirrel bounties – Important notice. Available at https://nargc.ie/mink-and-grey-squirrel-bounties-important-notice/. Accessed 17 Dec 2017.
  59. Nature Conservancy Magazine. (2017). Jemez Mountains salamander: Sniff test. Fall edition. ISSN 1540-2428, 47.Google Scholar
  60. Nugent, R. (1991). The search for the pink-headed duck: A journey into the Himalayas and down the Brahmaputra. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  61. Nussbaum, R. A., & Pfrender, M. E. (1998). Revision of the African Caecilian genus Schistometopum Parker (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Caeciliidae). Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, USA.Google Scholar
  62. O’Donnell, C. F. J., & Williams, E. M. (2015). Protocols for the inventory and monitoring of populations of the endangered Australasian bittern (Botaurus poiciloptilus) in New Zealand, Department of Conservation technical series (Vol. 38). Wellington: Department of Conservation. 40 pp.Google Scholar
  63. Oldenburg, C. J., Schoon, A., & Heitkönig, I. M. A. (2016). Wildlife detection dog training: A case study on achieving generalization between target odor variations while retaining specificity. Journal of Veterinary Behaviour, 13, 34–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Olsen, P. F. (1959). Muskrat breeding biology at Delta, Manitoba. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 23, 40–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Palazón, S., Melero, Y., Plaza, M., Santulli, G., Garcia, K., Ruiz-Olmo, J., Pifarre, M., Minobis, B., & Gosálbez, J. (2016). Situation of feral American mink (Neovison vison) in Catalonia: Expansion, distribution, ecology and population control. Butlletí de la Institució Catalana d’Història Natural, 80, 145–154.Google Scholar
  66. Palmer, R. (1976). Handbook of North American birds (Vol. 3). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Reid, N., Hayden, B., Lundy, M. G., Pietravalle, S., McDonald, R. A., & Montgomery, W. I. (2013). National Otter Survey of Ireland 2010/12. Irish wildlife manuals, no. 76, National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
  68. Reid, F., Schiaffini, M., & Schipper, J. (2016). Neovision vision. The IUCN red list of threatened species 2016. e.T41661A45214988. Available at  https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T41661A45214988.en. Accessed 13 Dec 2017.
  69. Reynolds, J. C., Porteus, T. A., Richardson, S. M., Leigh, R. J., & Short, M. (2010). Detectability of American mink using rafts to solicit field signs in a population control context. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 74, 1601–1606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rheingantz, M. L., & Trinca, C. S. (2015). Lontra longicaudis. The IUCN red list of threatened species 2015: e.T12304A21937379. Available at  https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-2.RLTS.T12304A21937379.en. Accessed 17 Dec 2017.
  71. Rooney, N. J., Monrat, S., & Guest, C. (2013). Investigation into the value of trained glycaemia alert dogs to clients with Type 1 diabetes. PLOS ONE, 8, e69921. Available at  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069921. Accessed 17 Dec 2017.
  72. Sakai, A. K., Allendorf, F. W., Holt, J. S., Lodge, D. M., Molofsky, J., With, K. A., Baughman, S., Cabin, R. J., Cohen, J. E., Ellstrand, N. C., McCauley, D. E., O’Neil, P., Parker, I. M., Thompson, J. N., & Well, S. G. (2001). The population biology of invasive species. Annual Review of Ecological Systems, 32, 302–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schooley, R., Cotner, L. A., Ahlers, A. A., & Heske, E. J. (2012). Monitoring site occupancy for American mink in its native range. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 76, 824–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sclater, P. L., & Hudson, W. H. (1889). Argentine ornithology, volume II (of II) – A descriptive catalogue of the birds of the Argentine Republic. London: Cavendish Square.Google Scholar
  75. Sepúlveda, M. A., Singer, R. S., Silva-Rodiquez, E., Eguern, A., Stowhas, P., & Pelican, K. (2014). Invasive American mink: Linking pathogen risk between domestic and endangered carnivores. EcoHealth, 11, 409–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Serfass, T., Evans, S. S., & Polechla, P. (2015). Lontra canadensis. The IUCN red list of threatened species 2015: e.T12302A21936349. Available at  https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-2.RLTS.T12302A21936349.en. Accessed 17 Dec 2017.
  77. Skyriene, G., & Paulauskas, A. (2012). Distribution of invasive muskrats (Ondatra zibethicus) and impact on ecosystem. Ekologija, 58, 357–367.Google Scholar
  78. Stuart, S. N., Chanson, J. S., Cox, N. A., Young, B. E., Rodrigues, A. S. L., Fischman, D. L., & Waller, R. W. (2004). Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Sciencexpress, 1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103538. Accessed 14 Oct 2017.
  79. Sussex Wildlife Trust. (2016). Survey manual for Otter Spotters. Available at https://assets.sussexwildlifetrust.org.uk/otter-spotters-pack-2.pdf. Accessed 17 Dec 2017.
  80. The Nature Conservancy. (2017). Four-legged researchers sniff out critical conservation data to help New Mexico’s forests adapt to a changing climate. Available at https://www.nature.org/ourinitiatives/regions/northamerica/unitedstates/newmexico/conservation-canines-come-to-new-mexico.xml. Accessed 16 Dec 2017.
  81. Tordoff, A., Appleton, T., Eames, J., Eberhardt, K., Hla, H., Ma Ma Thwin, K., & Myo Aung, S. (2008). The historical and current status of Pink-headed Duck Rhodonessa caryophyllacea in Myanmar. Bird Conservation International, 18, 38–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tuyttens, F. M. A., & Stuyck, J. J. (2002). Effectiveness and efficiency of chlorophacinone poisoning for the control of muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus) populations. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 29, 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tyre, A. J., Tenhumberg, B., Field, S. A., Niejalke, D., Parris, K., & Possingham, H. P. (2003). Improving precision and reducing bias in biological surveys: Estimating false-negative error rates. Ecological Applications, 16, 1790–1801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). (2016). Waterfowl population status, 2016. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior.Google Scholar
  85. Wainwright, M. (1998, August 30). Hunters see good sport in freed mink. The Guardian. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/uk/1998/aug/29/animalwelfare.world. Accessed 13 Dec 2017.
  86. Wasser, S. K., Davenport, B., Ramage, E. R., Hunt, K. E., Parker, M., Clarke, C., & Stenhouse, G. (2004). Scat detection dogs in wildlife research and management: Application to grizzly and black bears in the Yellowhead Ecosystem, Alberta, Canada. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 82, 475–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Williams, E. M. (2016). Developing monitoring methods for cryptic species: A case study of the Australasian bittern Botaurus poiciloptilus. Unpublished PhD thesis, Massey University, Palmerston North.Google Scholar
  88. Yetman, C. A., Mokonoto, P., & Ferguson, W. H. (2012). Conservation implications of the age/size distribution of Giant Bullfrogs (Pyxicephalus adspersus) at three peri-urban breeding sites. Herpetological Journal, 22, 23–32.Google Scholar
  89. Young, B. E., Lips, K. R., Reaser, J. K., Ibáñez, R., Salas, A. W., Cedeño, J. R., Coloma, L. A., Ron, S., La Marca, E., Meyer, J. R., Muñoz, A., Bolaños, F., Chaves, G., & Romo, D. (2001). Population declines and priorities for amphibian conservation in Latin America. Conservation Biology, 15, 1213–1223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zimmerman, B. L. (1994). Audio strip transects. In W. R. Heyer, M. A. Donnelly, R. W. McDiarmid, L. C. Hayek, & M. S. Foster (Eds.), Measuring and monitoring biological diversity. Standard methods for amphibians (pp. 92–97). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institute Press.Google Scholar
  91. Zoos Victoria. (2015). Zoos Victoria’s priority species. Baw Baw frog. Philoria frosti. Critically Endangered. Available at https://www.zoo.org.au/sites/default/files/ZV_FEInsert_%20BawBawFrog_A4_FINAL_LR.pdf. Accessed 16 Dec 2017.
  92. Zoos Victoria. (2017). Fighting extinction detection dog program. Available at https://www.zoo.org.au/fighting-extinction/FE-dog-squad/detection-dogs. Accessed 17 Dec 2017.
  93. Zuberogoitia, I., Zabala, J., & Marinez, J. A. (2006). Evaluation of sign surveys and trappability of American mink: Management consequences. Folia Zoology, 55, 257–263.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jim Shields
    • 1
  • Lana M. Austin
    • 2
  1. 1.Australian Ecosystems Foundation Inc.New South WalesAustralia
  2. 2.K-9 ConservationConservation Volunteers AustraliaBallaratAustralia

Personalised recommendations