Advertisement

Water Search Overview: Searching with Dogs in an Aquatic Environment

  • Debra Tirmenstein
  • Robert Freedline
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter details both historic and current applications of dogs in water search for SAR/cadaver/human forensics, with crossover into terrestrial and conservation detection work (e.g., invasive plants and mussels). Key elements of the aquatic environment are identified along with a description of how water search is conducted with a dog, target scents, scent transfer, and types of water search (shoreline, dock, and from a boat).

Keywords

Search dog Detector dog Water search Water dog Search and rescue SAR Cadaver dog Aquatic environment 

Notes

All kinds of water.

Lakes, rivers, oceans and pools.

I like the way it feels on my skin.

It feels good. It feels warm. It feels safe.

Dallas Ellison, age 10

References

  1. Bryson, S. (1996). Police dog tactics. New York: McGraw Hill. 456 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Eisenhauer, P. M. (1971). Dogs for swimmer defense. Research and development report, NSRDL/PCC 3469. Panama City: Naval Ship and Development Laboratory.Google Scholar
  3. Graham, J. (1985, May–June). Underwater searches using dogs. Response, pp. 21–23.Google Scholar
  4. Graham, H., & Graham, J. (1985, January). Training for water search. Dog Sports Magazine, Cannot find page numbers.Google Scholar
  5. Haglund, W. D. (1993). Disappearance of soft tissue and the disarticulation of human remains from aqueous environments. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 38, 806–815.Google Scholar
  6. Hardy, M. (1992). How to develop and train a water search dog team. Rockville: Mid-Atlantic D.O.G.S. 38 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Hurt, A., Guscio, D., Tirmenstein, D. A., Richards, N., Burch, A., & Marler, M. (2016). Using search dogs for biological eradication programs – A tale about Dyer’s Woad (Isatis tinctoria L.). In M. Schwarzländer and J. H. Gaskin (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Northern Rockies Invasive Plants Council Conference (pp. 73–86), February 10–13, 2014, Airway Heights, WA. USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team: Morgantown, West Virginia. FHTET-2016-03, 189 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Koenig, M. (1984, September 27–30). Utilizing dogs for body searches. National Association for Search and Rescue, Conference papers, Reno, NV, pp. 263–273.Google Scholar
  9. Koenig, M. (1990). Handler strategies for water search scenes. Redmond: Mastercraft Plans West. 19 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Koenig, M. (1994). Reading the dog [unpublished draft]. 5 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Osterkamp, T. (2011). K9 water searches: Scent and scent transport considerations. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 56, 907–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Richardson, J. M., Jr. (1971). Personnel and training implications for aqua dogs. Washington: Naval Personnel Research and Development Laboratory. 28 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Teather, R. G. (1994). Encyclopedia of underwater investigations. Flagstaff: Best Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Tirmenstein, D. (1998). Scent discrimination in canine water search. Response, 16, 23–27.Google Scholar
  15. Vass, A. A., Smith, R. R., Thompson, C. V., Burnett, M. N., Wolf, D. A., Synstelien, J. A., Dulgerian, N., & Eckenrode, B. A. (2004). Decompositional odor analysis database. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 49, 760–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Clarkfork-Bitterroot Search DogsFrenchtownUSA

Personalised recommendations