Advertisement

Measuring Creativity at Work

  • Xavier Caroff
  • Justine Massu
  • Todd Lubart
Chapter

Abstract

Creativity at work can be seen as the result of the interaction between individual (cognitive, conative, and affective) and environmental characteristics. Thus, individuals with creative potential will be more or less willing and able to act on this capacity depending on the presence or absence of psychological and environmental factors. The present chapter presents the different individual and environmental factors influencing creativity in organizations. It introduces different tools to assess creative potential and organizational climate for creativity as well as methods to evaluate creative accomplishments.

References

  1. Adobe. (2012a). Creativity and education: Why it matters (pp. 1–23). Retrieved from http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pressroom/pdfs/Adobe_Creativity_and_Education_Why_It_Matters_study.pdf
  2. Adobe. (2012b). State of create: Global benchmark study on attitudes and beliefs about creativity at work, school, and home (pp. 1–37). Retrieved from http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pressroom/pressreleases/201204/042312AdobeGlobalCreativityStudy.html
  3. Adobe. (2016). State of create 2016 (pp. 1–50). Adobe. Retrieved from http://www.adobe.com/content/dam/acom/en/max/pdfs/AdobeStateofCreate_2016_Report_Final.pdf
  4. Althuizen, N. (2012). The relative performance of different methods for selecting creative marketing personnel. Marketing Letters, 23(4), 973–985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-012-9198-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1994). The team climate inventory: Manual and user’s guide. Windsor, Berkshire: ASE Press.Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work innovation: development and validation of the Team Climate Inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 235–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 123–167). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  9. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  10. Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 367–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154–1184.Google Scholar
  12. Anderson, N., Potocnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40, 1297–1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Baer, J. (1996). Does artistic creativity decline during elementary school? Psychological Reports, 78, 927–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Baer, J., Kaufman, J. C., & Gentile, C. A. (2004). Extension of the consensual assessment technique to nonparallel creative products. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 113–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Barbot, B., Tan, M., Randi, J., Santa-Donato, G., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2012). Essential skills for creative writing: Integrating multiple domain-specific perspectives. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7, 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Benzer, J., & Horner, M. (2015). A meta-analytic integration and test of psychological climate dimensionality. Human Resource Management, 54, 457–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Binnewies, C., Ohly, S., & Sonnentag, S. (2007). Taking personal initiative and communicating about ideas: What is important for the creative process and for idea creativity? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16, 432–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Caroff, X., & Lubart, T. (2012). Multidimensional approach to detecting creative potential in managers. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.652927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen, C., Himsel, A., Kasof, J., Greenberger, E., & Dmitrieva, J. (2006). Boundless creativity: Evidence for the domain generality of individual differences in creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 40, 179–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chen, C., Kasof, J., Himsel, A., Dmitrieva, J., Dong, Q., & Xue, G. (2005). Effects of explicit instruction to “be creative” across domains and cultures. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 39, 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chen, C., Kasof, J., Himsel, A. J., Greenberger, E., Dong, Q., & Xue, G. (2002). Creativity in drawings of geometric shapes: A cross-cultural examination with the consensual assessment technique. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cropley, D. H. (2006). The role of creativity as a driver of innovation. 2006 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, 2(January), 561–565. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMIT.2006.262281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behavior. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19, 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dollinger, S. J., & Shaffran, M. (2005). Note on consensual assessment technique in creativity research. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 100, 592–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dollinger, S. J., Urban, K., & James, T. A. (2004). Creativity and openness: Further validation of two creative product measures. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dorenbosch, L., Van Engen, M. L., & Verhagen, M. (2005). On-the-job innovation: The impact of job design and human resource management through production ownership. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14, 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8691.2005.00333.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 105–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Elsbach, K., & Kramer, R. (2003). Assessing creativity in Hollywood pitch meetings: Evidence for a dual-process model of creativity judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 283–301.Google Scholar
  29. Ettlie, J. E., & O’Keefe, R. D. (1982). Innovative attitudes, values, and intentions in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 19, 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1982.tb00066.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and social psychology review, 2, 290–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Galati, F. (2015). Complexity of judgment: What makes possible the convergence of expert and nonexpert ratings in assessing creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 27, 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2015.992667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hennessey, B. A. (1994). The consensual assessment technique: An examination of the relationship between ratings of process and product creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 1993–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1999). Consensual assessment. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 347–359). San Diego, CA: Academic press.Google Scholar
  34. Hickey, M. (2001). An application of Amabile’s consensual assessment technique for rating the creativity of children’s musical compositions. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49, 234–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Howell, J. M., Shea, C. M., & Higgins, C. A. (2005). Champions of product innovations: Defining, developing, and validating a measure of champion behavior. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 641–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.06.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hunter, S. T., Bedell, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2005). Dimensions of creative climate: A general taxonomy. Korean Journal of Thinking et Problem Solving, 15, 97–116.Google Scholar
  37. Hunter, S. T., Bedell, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Climate for creativity: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hunter, S. T., Cushenbery, L., & Friedrich, T. (2012). Hiring an innovative workforce: A necessary yet uniquely challenging endeavor. Human Resource Management Review, 22, 303–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. IBM. (2010a). Capitalizing on complexity: Insights from the global chief executive officer study. Somers: IBM.Google Scholar
  40. IBM. (2010b). 2010 global CEO study: Creativity selected as most crucial factor for future success. Retrieved July 6, 2017, from https://www03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/31670.wss
  41. Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness, and innovative work behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Joussemet, M., & Koestner, R. (1999). Effect of expected rewards on children’s creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 231–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 169–211). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  44. Kasof, J., Chen, C., Himsel, A., & Greenberger, E. (2007). Values and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2012). Beyond new and appropriate: Who decides what is creative? Creativity Research Journal, 24, 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., & Cole, J. C. (2009). Expertise, domains, and the consensual assessment technique. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43, 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01316.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., Cropley, D. H., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Sinnett, S. (2013). Furious activity vs. understanding: How much expertise is needed to evaluate creative work? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7, 332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kaufman, J. C., Niu, W., Sexton, J. D., & Cole, J. C. (2010). In the eye of the beholder: Differences across ethnicity and gender in evaluating creative work. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 496–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kaufman, J. C., Plucker, J. A., & Baer, J. (2008). Essentials of creativity assessment (p. 221). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
  50. Kleysen, R. F., & Street, C. T. (2001). Toward a multi-dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2, 284–296. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Krause, D. E. (2004). Influence-based leadership as a determinant of the inclination to innovate and of innovation-related behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kunz, J., & Linder, S. (2013). With a view to make things better: Individual characteristics and intentions to engage in management innovation. Journal of Management & Governance, 19, 525–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-013-9280-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lee, S., Lee, J., & Youn, C.-Y. (2005). A variation of CAT for measuring creativity in business products. The Korean Journal of Thinking & Problem Solving, 15, 143–153.Google Scholar
  54. Lu, C.-C., & Luh, D.-B. (2012). A comparison of assessment methods and raters in product creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 331–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lubart, T., Mouchiroud, C., Tordjman, S., & Zenasni, F. (2015). Psychologie de la créativité (Vol. 2, p. 186). Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  56. Lubart, T. I. (1999). Creativity across cultures. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 339–350). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Lubart, T. I., & Getz, I. (1997). Emotion, metaphor and the creative process. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 285–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lubart, T. I., Zenasni, F., & Barbot, B. (2013). Creative potential and its measurement. International Journal of Talent Development and Creativity, 1, 41–51.Google Scholar
  59. McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Malakate, A., Andriopoulos, C., & Gotsi, M. (2007). Assessing job candidates’ creativity: propositions and future research directions. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16, 307–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mathisen, G. E., & Einarsen, S. (2004). A review of instruments assessing creative and innovative environments within organizations. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 119–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Mumford, M. (2000). Managing creative people: strategies and tactics for innovation. Human resource management review, 10, 313–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Niu, W., & Sternberg, R. (2001). Cultural influences on artistic creativity and its evaluation. International Journal of Psychology, 36, 225–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Paulus, P. B. (2002). Different ponds for different fish: A contrasting perspective on team innovation. Applied Psychology, 51, 394–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Piffer, D. (2012). Can creativity be measured? An attempt to clarify the notion of creativity and general directions for future research. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7, 258–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Prabhu, V. P. (2011). Risk-taking. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, 2nd ed., pp. 319–323). New York: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rice, G. (2006). Individual values, organizational context, and self-perceptions of employee creativity: Evidence from Egyptian organizations. Journal of Business Research, 59, 233–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rothenberg, A. (1979). The emerging goddess: The creative process in art, science, and other fields. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  70. Rothenberg, A. (2001). Bipolar illness, creativity, and treatment. Psychiatr Q, 72, 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Runco, M. A., & Charles, R. E. (1993). Judgments of originality and appropriateness as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 537–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Runco, M. A., Plucker, J. A., & Lim, W. (2001). Development and psychometric integrity of a measure of ideational behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Runco, M. A., Walczyk, J. J., Acar, S., Cowger, E. L., Simundson, M., & Tripp, S. (2014). The incremental validity of a short form of the ideational behavior scale and usefulness of distractor, contraindicative, and lie scales. Journal of Creative Behavior, 48, 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580–607. https://doi.org/10.2307/256701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Scratchley, L. S., & Hakstian, A. R. (2001). The measurement and prediction of managerial creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 367–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Silvia, P. J. (2008). Discernment and creativity: How well can people identify their most creative ideas? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 139–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Stanko-Kaczmarek, M. (2012). The effect of intrinsic motivation on the affect and evaluation of the creative process among fine arts students. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 304–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press. Weisberg.Google Scholar
  79. Tang, M. (2017). Creativity and innovation: Basic concepts and approaches. In M. Tang & C. H. Werner (Eds.), Handbook of the management of creativity and innovation (pp. 3–32). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813141889_0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Walberg, H. A. (1988). Creativity and talent as learning. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 340–361). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  81. World Economic Forum. (2016). The future of jobs: Employment, skills, and workforce strategy for the fourth industrial revolution (p. 167). Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs.pdf

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xavier Caroff
    • 1
  • Justine Massu
    • 1
  • Todd Lubart
    • 1
  1. 1.Paris-Descartes UniversityParisFrance

Personalised recommendations