Advertisement

An Experienced EFL Teacher’s Perception of High-Stakes English Language Tests and Beliefs About Language Teaching: A Case Study

  • Yumiko Moore
Chapter

Abstract

Numerous studies of EFL teaching in Japan have found that high school and university entrance examinations have a washback effect on teachers’ pedagogical practices that can lead to inconsistencies between how they teach in practice and how they would like to teach. This study investigates the washback phenomenon and how teachers’ beliefs about pedagogy can be changed through an in-depth study of an experienced Japanese junior high school teacher of English. In particular, it uses data collected from the teacher’s reflective online blog and an interview conducted by the researcher. The study shows how this teacher’s beliefs and consequently teaching practices and his involvement in entrance examinations changed as he went through a course of professional development, which ultimately led to him rejecting a more established teaching method, namely grammar-translation [yakudoku], in favour of Communicative Language Teaching. In this way, the study provides insights into how teachers’ beliefs can change their pedagogy with positive results in the classroom.

References

  1. Alderson, C., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (1996). TOEFL preparation courses: A study of washback. Language Testing, 13, 280–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alderson, J. C., & Wall, D. (1993). Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics, 14, 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, G. (1998). Fundamentals of educational research. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, K., & Jack, D. (1991). Learning to listen: Interview techniques and analysis. In B. Gluck & D. Patai (Eds.), Women’s words: The feminist practice of oral history (pp. 11–26). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Aragão, R. (2011). Beliefs and emotions in foreign language learning. System, 39, 302–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barcelos, A. M. F. (2003). Researching beliefs about SLA: A critical review. In P. Kalaja & A. M. F. Barcelos (Eds.), Beliefs about SLA: New research approaches (pp. 7–34). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bell, J. S. (Ed.). (1997). Teacher research in second and foreign language education. Canadian Modern Language Review, 54, 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bell, J. S. (2002). Narrative inquiry: More than just telling stories. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 207–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Birjandi, P., & Taqizadeh, M. (2015). What drives high school English teachers to teach the way they do? An investigation of the washback effect of the university entrance examination in Iran. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2, 8–20.Google Scholar
  10. Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36, 81–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  12. Borg, S. (2011). The impact of in-service teacher education on language teachers’ beliefs. System, 39, 370–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheng, L. (1997). How does washback influence teaching? Implications for Hong Kong. Language and Education, 11, 38–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cheng, L. Y., & Curtis, A. (2012). Test impact and washback: Implications for teaching and learning. In C. Coombe, P. Davidson, B. O’Sullivan, & S. Stoynoff (Eds.), Cambridge guide to second language assessment (pp. 89–95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Choi, I. (2008). The impact of EFL testing in EFL education in Korea. Language Testing, 25, 39–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clandinin, C., & Connelly, F. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Cohen, A. D. (1994). Assessing language ability in the classroom (2nd ed.). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
  18. Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  21. Farrell, T. S. C., & Kun, S. T. K. (2008). Language policy, language teachers’ beliefs, and classroom practices. Applied Linguistics, 29, 381–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103, 1013–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Flick, U. (2006). An introduction to qualitative research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Francis, D. (1995). The reflective journal: A window to preservice teachers’ practical knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11, 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Golombek, P. R. (1998). A study of language teachers’ personal practical knowledge. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 447–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gorsuch, G. (1998). Yakudoku EFL instruction in two Japanese high school classrooms: An exploratory study. JALT Journal, 20, 6–32.Google Scholar
  27. Gorsuch, G. (2000). EFL educational policies and education cultures: Influences on teachers’ approval of communicative activities. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 675–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Green, A. (2007). Washback to learning outcomes: A comparative study of IELTS preparation and university pre-sessional language courses. Assessment in Education, 14, 75–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Green, A. (2013). Washback in language assessment. International Journal of English Studies, 13, 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gregory, K., & Clarke, M. (2003). High-stakes assessment in England and Singapore. Theory Into Practice, 42, 66–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hamp-Lyons, L. (1997). Washback, impact and validity: Ethical concerns. Language Testing, 14, 295–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harlen, W. (2005). Teachers’ summative practices and assessment for learning: Tensions and synergies. Curriculum Journal, 16, 207–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hinkel, E., & Fotos, S. (2002). From theory to practice: A teacher’s view. In E. Hinkel & S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 1–12). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  34. Holt Reynolds, D. (1992). Personal history-based beliefs as relevant prior knowledge in course work. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 325–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Horwitz, E. K. (1985). Using student beliefs about language learning and teaching in the foreign language methods course. Foreign Language Annals, 18, 333–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Horwitz, E. K. (1987). Surveying students’ beliefs about language learning. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 110–129). London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  37. Johnson, K. E. (1994). The emerging beliefs and instructional practices of preservice English as second language teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10, 439–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Johnson, K. E., & Golombek, P. E. (2002). Teachers’ narrative inquiry as professional development. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Josselson, R. (1995). Imagining the real: Empathy, narrative, and the dialogic self. In R. Josselson & A. Lieblich (Eds.), Interpreting experience: The narrative study of lives (pp. 27–44). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Kalaja, P., & Barcelos, A. M. F. (2003). Beliefs about SLA: New research approaches. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kurihara, Y. (2013). EFL teachers’ learning: Transitional experiences from an overseas teacher education program to Japanese school settings. JALT Journal, 35, 51–72.Google Scholar
  42. Ma, J., & Ren, S. (2011). A study of professional development of college English teachers through narrative inquiry. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1, 530–533.Google Scholar
  43. Mantle-Bromley, C. (1995). Positive attitude and realistic beliefs: Links to proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 79, 372–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mercer, S. (2011). Language learner self-concept: Complexity, continuity and change. System, 39, 335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. MEXT. (2011a). What is the course of study? Retrieved September 30, 2016, from http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/shotou/new-cs/idea/1304372.htm
  46. MEXT. (2011b). Higher secondary education. Retrieved September 30, 2016, from http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/shotou/kaikaku/main8_a2.htm
  47. MEXT. (2014). English education reform plan corresponding to globalization. Retrieved September 30, 2016, from http://www.mext.go.jp/english/topics/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2014/01/23/1343591_1.pdf
  48. Mok, W. E. (1994). Reflecting on reflections: A case study of experienced and inexperienced ESL teachers. System, 22, 93–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Moore, Y. (2015). An evaluation of English writing assessment of Japanese university entrance examinations. Writing and Pedagogy, 7, 233–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Negueruela-Azarola, E. (2011). Beliefs as conceptualizing activity: A dialectical approach for the second language classroom. System, 39, 359–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nishimuro, M., & Borg, S. (2013). Teacher cognition and grammar teaching in a Japanese high school. JALT Journal, 35, 29–50.Google Scholar
  52. Nishino, T. (2008). Communicative language teaching: An exploratory survey. JALT Journal, 30, 27–50.Google Scholar
  53. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pan, Y. C. (2008). A critical review of five language washback studies from 1995–2007: Methodological considerations. Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 12, 2–14.Google Scholar
  55. Pan, Y. C. (2009). A review of washback and its pedagogical implications. VNU Journal of Science, Foreign Languages, 25, 257–263.Google Scholar
  56. Pavlenko, A. (2002). Narrative study: Whose story is it, anyway? TESOL Quarterly, 36, 213–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pearson, I. (1988). Tests as leavers for change. In D. Chamberlain & R. J. Baumgardner (Eds.), ESP in the classroom: Practice and evaluation (pp. 98–107). London: Modern English.Google Scholar
  58. Peng, J.-E. (2011). Changes in language learning beliefs during a transition to tertiary study: The mediation of classroom affordances. System, 39, 314–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pizarro, M. A. (2010). Exploring the washback effects of a high-stakes English test on the teaching of English in Spanish upper secondary schools. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 23, 149–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Polkinghorne, D. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8, 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Qi, L. (2004). Has a high-stakes test produced the intended changes? In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods (pp. 3–17). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  62. Qi, L. (2005). Stakeholders’ conflicting aims undermine the washback functions of a high-stakes test. Language Testing, 22, 142–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rex, L. A., & Nelson, M. (2004). How teachers’ professional identities position high-stakes test preparation in their classrooms. Teachers College Record, 106, 1288–1331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Riches, D. (2010). The practices of university admissions and entrance examinations: Their impact on learning and educational programs. Tokyo: Association of Social Innovation Studies, Seijo University.Google Scholar
  65. Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  66. Salehi, H., & Yunus, M. M. (2012). The washback effect of the Iranian universities entrance exam: Teachers’ insights. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 12, 609–628.Google Scholar
  67. Sato, K., & Kleinsasser, R. C. (2004). Beliefs, practices, and interactions of teachers in a Japanese high school English department. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 797–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Shohamy, E., Donitsa-Schmidt, S., & Ferman, I. (1996). Test impact revisited: Washback effect over time. Language Testing, 13, 298–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Taguchi, N. (2002). Implementing oral communication classes in upper secondary schools: A case study. The Language Teacher Online. Retrieved September 30, 2016, from http://jalt-publications.org/old_tlt/articles/2002/12/taguchi
  70. Watanabe, Y. (1996). Does grammar translation come from the entrance examination? Preliminary findings from classroom-based research. Language Testing, 13, 318–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Watanabe, Y. (2003). Teacher factors mediating washback. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods (pp. 129–146). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  72. Wellington, J. (2000). Educational research: Contemporary issues and practical approaches. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  73. Williams, M., & Burden, R. L. (1997). Psychology for language teachers: A social constructivist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Woods, D., & Cakır, H. (2011). Two dimensions of teacher knowledge: The case of communicative language teaching. System, 39, 381–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Xie, Q. (2015). Do component weighting and testing method affect time management and approaches to test preparation? A study on the washback mechanism. System, 50, 56–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Xie, Q., & Andrew, S. (2013). Do test design and uses influence preparation? Testing a model of washback with structural equation modeling. Language Testing, 30, 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Yin, Y. (2010). The place of language testing and assessment in the professional preparation of foreign language teachers in China. Language Testing, 27, 555–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zhang, F., & Liu, Y. (2013). A study of secondary school English teachers’ beliefs in the context of curriculum reform in China. Language Testing Research, 18, 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yumiko Moore
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ExeterExeterUK

Personalised recommendations