Advertisement

The Rise of the New Power Party in Taiwan’s 2016 Legislative Election: Reality and Challenges

  • Ian Tsung-yen Chen
  • Da-chi Liao
Chapter
Part of the Politics and Development of Contemporary China book series (PDCC)

Abstract

This chapter asks that given Taiwan’s current socioeconomic situation and electoral system, will the newly emerged New Power Party (NPP) become one of the main political parties in Taiwan in the upcoming future? We answer the question by identifying electoral, ideological, supportive, and organizational factors. The findings show that, first, the current electoral system seems unfavorable for a small party like NPP who rely on more radical stances; second, the NPP’s ideological positions may be adverse to increase its voters’ base; third, the NPP’s ambition of becoming a left-wing political party does not seem to correspond well with current supporters; and fourth, the party’s centralized, top-down communicative manner can be detrimental to its popularity among the new internet generation.

Keywords

New Power Party Taiwan Sunflower Student Movement Anti-establishment Left-wing party Connective logic 

Bibliography

  1. Allen, Katie. 2016. Economic Woes Create Anti-Establishment Movements Around the World. The Guardian, November 5. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/nov/05/economic-woe-trump-style-movements-created-worldwide. Accessed 9 Jan 2017.
  2. Barr, Robert R. 2009. Populists, Outsiders and Anti-Establishment Politics. Party Politics 15: 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Batto, Nathan F., and Gary W. Cox. 2016. Introduction: Legislature-Centric and Executive-Centric Theories of Party Systems and Faction Systems. In Mixed-Member Electoral Systems in Constitutional Context, ed. Nathan F. Batto, Chi Huang, Alexander C. Tan, and Gary W. Cox, 1–22. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, W. Lance, and Alexandra Segerberg. 2013. The Logic of Connective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Branton, Regina P. 2003. Examining Individual-Level Voting Behavior on State Ballot Propositions. Political Research Quarterly 56: 367–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burnham, Walter D. 1970. Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  7. Chang, Kuang-chiu. 2016. Minchintang weilai tsuita te mafan shih shihtai Liliang [New Power Party will be the Biggest Trouble for Democratic Progressive Party]. Pinguo ribao [Apple Daily], March 10. http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20160310/812930/. Accessed 21 Aug 2016.
  8. Chen, Yu-fu. 2016. Liangan zhengce mindiao: shidai Liliang zhengdangpiao zhichidu 10.8% [Cross-Strait Policy Association’s Survey: New Power Party Receives 10.8% Party Support Rate]. Ziyou Shibao [Liberty Times], January 5. http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/1561916. Accessed 21 Aug 2016.
  9. Chen, Kuang-hui, and Chi-lin Tsai. 2010. Xuexiao jiaoyu yu zhengzhi shehuihua: jiaoyu Chengdu yu ziwo rending de guanlianxing [School Education and Political Socialization: Exploring Strength of Association between Education and Self-Identity in Taiwan]. Taiwan zhengzhi xuekan [Taiwan Political Science Review] 14: 55–103.Google Scholar
  10. Chu, Pu-ching. 2015. Shidai liliang shoudu biaotai guojia dingwei ‘tianrandu shi chuangdang DNA’ [New Power Party First Reveals its Position for the Nation, Organic Independence is the Party’s DNA]. Minbao [Taiwan People News], July 8. http://www.peoplenews.tw/news/d636485c-1fff-4218-88d7-9afb7f6c4472. Accessed 21 Aug 2016.
  11. Dalton, Russell J., Paul A. Beck, and Scott C. Flangan. 1984. Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. In Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies: Realignment or Dealignment? ed. Russell J. Dalton, Paul A. Beck, and Scott C. Flangan, 3–22. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  13. Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Model State. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Egerton, Muriel. 2002. Political Partisanship, Voting Abstention and Higher Education: Changing Preferences in a British Youth Cohort in the 1990s. Higher Education Quarterly 56: 156–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gerber, Abraham. 2017. NPP Lawmakers Shocked by Neil Peng’s Resignation. Taipei Times, January 10. http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2017/01/10/2003662835. Accessed 16 Jan 2017.
  16. Hsiao, Yi-ching, and Su-feng Cheng. 2014. Citizens’ Perceptions of the Left-Right Ideology in Taiwan: Replacing Left-Right Ideology with the Unification—Independence Issue to Measure Taiwan’s Party Polarization. The Taiwanese Political Science Review 18: 79–138.Google Scholar
  17. Liao, Da-Chi, and Boyu Chen. 2016. Strengthening Democracy: Development of the iVoter Website in Taiwan. In Political Behavior and Technology: Voting Advice Applications in East Asia, ed. Da-Chi Liao, Boyu Chen, and Michael Jensen, 67–89. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Liao, Da-Chi, Boyu Chen, and Chi-chen Huang. 2013. The Decline of ‘Chinese Identity’ in Taiwan?!—An Analysis of Survey Data from 1992 to 2012. East Asia: An International Quarterly 30: 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liao, Da-Chi, Yueh-Ching Chen, San-Yih Hwang, and Shan-Lin Chang. 2016a. An Assessment of Social Movements’ Impact upon Representative Deficit by Two Taiwanese Cases. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Political Science Association, September.Google Scholar
  20. Liao, Da-Chi, Bo-Jyun Peng, Ian Tsung-Yen Chen, and Jih-Wen Lin. 2016b. Oligarchical Connective? An Examination of Taiwan New Power Party’s Organizational forms and Practice in the Internet age. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Parties Online Party New Organizational Strategies in 8 Democracies, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, December 14–16.Google Scholar
  21. Liberty Times. 2016. Buyong keyi gaohan Freddy Lim: Taidu shuode hen ziran [No Need to Voice, Freddy Lim: Speaking Taiwan Independence Is Natural]. February 27. http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/1615359. Accessed 15 Aug 2016.
  22. Lin, Wei-feng. 2015. Ludang shemindang zu canzheng lianmeng yu shidai Liliang zhenghe poju [Green Party and Social Democratic Party Form an Political Alliance and Broke up with New Power Party]. Feng chuanmei [Storm Media], July 27. www.storm.mg/article/58916. Accessed 20 Aug 2016.
  23. Pai, Chiao-yin and Li-Chiang Yao. 2016. Minjindang bufenqu kong suoshui Liuxi, Cai yingwen jihu: buyao fenpiao buyao peipiao [Democratic Progressive Party’s Seats of the Party-list may Reduce 6 seats, Tsai Ing-wen Urges: Don’t Separate or Allocate the Votes]. Sanli Xinwen [SET TV], January 7. http://www.setn.com/News.aspx?NewsID=117066. Accessed 21 Aug 2016.
  24. Schmitt, Hermann. 2014. Partisanship in Nine Western Democracies: Causes and Consequences. In Political Parties and Partisanship: Social Identity and Individual Attitudes, ed. John Bartle and Paolo Bellucci, 75–87. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Sung, Chien-jen. 2016. Shidai liliang: minjindang de tongmengjun Tsai Ing-wen de banjiaoshi [New Power Party: An Ally of Democratic Progressive Party, Tsai Ing-wen’s Stepping Stone]. Lianhebao [United Daily News], April 8. http://udn.com/news/story/6844/1616677. Accessed 24 Aug 2016.
  26. Wu, Chung-li, and Hung-chung Wang. 2003. Woguo xuanmin ‘fenli zhengfu’ xinli renzhi yu wendingdu: yi 2000nian zongtong xuanju yu 2001nian lifa weiyuan xuanju wei li [The Psychological Cognition for Divided Government and Electoral Stability in Taiwan: The Case if the 2000 Presidential and 2001 Legislative Yuan Elections]. Xuanju yanjiu [Journal of Electoral Studies] 10: 81–114.Google Scholar
  27. You, Ying-lung. 2016a. Weihe Taiwan zhisheng 16% de ren xihuan Kuomintang [Why only Remain 16% of People that like Kuomintang]. Feng chuanmei [Storm Media], July 30. www.storm.mg/article/147320. Accessed 28 Aug 2016.
  28. ———. 2016b. Minjindang zui touting de duishou─shidai liliang [Democratic Progressive Party’s Biggest Headache―New Power Party]. Feng chuanmei [Storm Media], August 6. www.storm.mg/article/150490. Accessed 28 Aug 2016.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian Tsung-yen Chen
    • 1
  • Da-chi Liao
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Political ScienceNational Sun Yat-sen UniversityKaohsiungTaiwan

Personalised recommendations