Advertisement

New Geographies of Class in Mexican and Brazilian Cinemas: Post Tenebras Lux and Que horas ela volta?

  • María Mercedes Vázquez Vázquez
Chapter

Abstract

Vázquez revisits two acclaimed films by the successful filmmakers Carlos Reygadas and Anna Muylaert to explore new political articulations of space in contemporary Mexican and Brazilian cinemas. By focusing on strategies of containment (Jameson), the combined analysis of Post Tenebras Lux (2012) and Que horas ela volta? (2015) sheds new light on a broad contemporary transformation in Mexican and Brazilian filmmaking towards a focus on the middle class. This study complements previous analyses that emphasize the aesthetic and affective dimensions of these films by applying Doreen Massey’s relational conceptualization of space to the films’ spatial explorations. Under this critical lens, the films belong to an emerging cine clasemediero (middle-class cinema) in Latin America where neoliberal social segregation translates into cinematographic distinctions.

Works Cited

  1. Arias Barreto, Alain. 2008. “Lucía Murat y el cine.” La Jiribilla. Revista de cultura cubana 397, 13–19 (December).Google Scholar
  2. Caldeira, Teresa P. R. 2000. City of Walls: Crime, Segregation, and Citizenship in São Paulo. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  3. ——. 2008. “From Modernism to Neoliberalism in São Paulo: Reconfiguring the City and Its Citizens.” In Other Cities, Other Worlds: Urban Imaginaries in a Globalizing Age, edited by Andreas Huyssen, 51–77. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Castañeda, Jorge. 2011. Mañana Forever?: Mexico and the Mexicans. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  5. Castillo, José. 2010. “Carlos Reygadas.” Bomb 111: 70–77.Google Scholar
  6. Dallas, Paul. 2013. “Culture Wars: Talking Brazilian Cinema and Its Discontents with Director Kleber Mendonça Filho.” Filmmaker 28 January. “http://filmmakermagazine.com”.
  7. De la Calle, Luis, and Luis Rubio. 2010. “Clasemedieros.” Nexos (May). “http://www.nexos.com.mx/?p=13742”.
  8. Ferreira, Francisco H. G., Julian Messina, Jamele Rigolini, Luis-Felipe López-Calva, María Ana Lugo, and Renos Vakis. 2013. Economic Mobility and the Rise of the Latin American Middle Class. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  9. Ferreira, Luis Fernando Correia, and Lívia Almada Neves. 2016. “O conceito do ócio vicário no filme ‘Que horas ela volta?’: Revisitando Thorstein Veblen em uma nova perspectiva dos fenômenos socioeconômicos.” Conference Paper. XL Encontro da ANPAD, September 25–28.Google Scholar
  10. Foucault, Michel. 1986. “Of Other Spaces.” Diacritics 16 (1): 22–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. García Canclini, Néstor. 2014. Imagined Globalization. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Haddu, Miriam. 2007. Contemporary Mexican Cinema 19891999: History, Space and Identity. New York: The Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
  13. Harvey, David. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Holmes, Amanda. 2011. “Landscape and the Artist’s Frame in Lucrecia Martel’s La ciénaga/The Swamp and La niña santa/The Holy Girl.” In New Trends in Argentine and Brazilian Cinema, edited by Cacilda Rêgo and Carolina Rocha, 131–46. Bristol: Intellect.Google Scholar
  15. Hopewell, John, and Emilio Mayorga. 2010. Reygadas Looks to ‘Lux’. Variety 418 (2): 8.Google Scholar
  16. Jameson, Fredric. 1991. Postmodernism or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  17. ——. 2002. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. ——. 2015. “The Aesthetics of Singularity.” New Left Review 92: 101–32.Google Scholar
  19. Janoschka, Michael, and Axel Borsdorf. 2006. “Condominios Fechados and Barrios Privados.” In Private Cities: Global and Local Perspectives, edited by Georg Glasze, Chris Webster, and Klaus Frantz, 92–108. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Janoschka, Michael, and Jorge Sequera. 2014. “Procesos de gentrificación y desplazamiento en América Latina, una perspectiva comparatista.” In Desafíos metropolitanos. Un diálogo entre Europa y América Latina, edited by Juan José Michelini, 82–104. Madrid: Catarata.Google Scholar
  21. Johnson, Randal. 2017. “Television and the Transformation of the Star System in Brazil.” In A Companion to Latin American Cinema, edited by Maria M. Delgado, Stephen M. Hart, and Randal Johnson, 21–35. Malden: Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. Krstić, Igor. 2016. Slums on Screen: World Cinema and the Planet of Slums. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Lana, Lígia. 2016. “‘Da porta da cozinha pra lá’: gênero e mudança social no filme Que horas ela volta?Rumores 19 (10): 121–37 (January–June).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lima, Bruna Della Torre De Carvalho. 2016. “Criticism and Condescension: The Triumph of the Poor in The Second Mother.” Latin American Perspectives 211 (6): 141−43 (November).Google Scholar
  25. Lyotard, Jean-François. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Machado, Uirá. 2011. “É um erro falar que existe nova classe média, diz sociólogo.” Folha de São Paulo, February 13, 2011. “http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/poder/2011/02/874777-e-um-erro-falar-que-existe-nova-classe-media-diz-sociologo.shtml”.
  27. MacLaird, Misha. 2013. Aesthetics and Politics in the Mexican Film Industry. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maricato, Ermínia. 2010. “The Statute of the Peripheral City.” In The City Statute of Brazil: A Commentary, edited by Celso Santos Carvalho and Anaclaudia Rossbach. São Paulo: Cities Alliance and Ministry of Cities. “http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/781901468014398230/The-City-Statute-of-Brazil-a-commentary”.
  29. Marsh, Leslie L. 2015. “Reordering (Social) Sensibilities: Balancing Realisms in Neighbouring Sounds.” Studies in Spanish & Latin American Cinemas 12 (2): 139–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. ——. 2017. “Women’s Filmmaking and Comedy in Brazil: Anna Muylaert’s Durval Discos (2002) and É Proibido Fumar (2009)”. In Latin American Women Filmmakers: Production, Politics, Poetics, edited by Deborah Martin and Deborah Shaw, 149–71. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  31. Massey, Doreen. 1992. “Politics and Space/Time.” New Left Review 1 (196): 65–84 (November–December).Google Scholar
  32. Nagib, Lúcia. 2002. O cinema da retomada. Depoimentos de 90 cineastas dos anos 90. São Paulo: Editora 34.Google Scholar
  33. Navarro, Vinicius. 2017. “Local Filmmaking in Brazil: Place, Politics, and Pernambuco’s New Cinema.” Studies in Spanish and Latin American Cinemas 14 (1): 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Newman, Kathleen. 2015. “A Different Mexican Postcard: Fernando Eimbcke’s Lake Tahoe (2008).” Studies in Spanish & Latin American Cinemas 12 (2): 159–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pinto Veas, Iván. 2015. “Lucrecia Martel.” La fuga 17. “http://2016.lafuga.cl/lucrecia-martel/735”.
  36. Podalsky, Laura. 2011. “Landscapes of Subjectivity in Contemporary Mexican Cinema.” New Cinemas: Journal of Contemporary Film 9 (2 & 3): 161–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rêgo, Cacilda, and Carolina Rocha, eds. 2011. New Trends in Argentine and Brazilian Cinema. Bristol: Intellect.Google Scholar
  38. Sánchez Prado, Ignacio M. 2014. Screening Neoliberalism: Transforming Mexican Cinema 19882012. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Shaw, Deborah. 2017. “Intimacy and Distance-Domestic Servants in Latin American Women’s Cinema: La mujer sin cabeza and El niño pez/The Fish Child.” In Latin American Women Filmmakers: Production, Politics, Poetics, edited by Deborah Martin and Deborah Shaw, 123–48. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  40. Tompkins, Cynthia. 2013. Experimental Latin American Cinema: History and Aesthetics. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • María Mercedes Vázquez Vázquez
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of Hong KongHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations