Advertisement

Policy for Jobs: Reducing Informality

  • Moazam Mahmood
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter argues that a major determinant of job quality is informality. Employment policies should, therefore, focus on enforcing the registration of both workers and enterprises to reduce informality and improve job quality. Such policies effectively extend social provisions that reduce workers’ vulnerability through social protection, minimum wages, and national legislation on improved conditions and rights. Mahmood provides among the first estimates of informality for a large sample of developing countries, based on which he draws two key policy implications. First, the demonstration of weaker job quality in informality gives a broad policy handle with which to improve jobs. Second, these new estimates allow a better decomposition of informality, showing large pockets of informality in the formal economy, requiring that policy on informality must be derived through an instrument to register not just enterprises, but also workers.

References

  1. Beccaria, Luis, Roxana Maurizio, and Gustavo Vazquez. 2014. Recent Changes in Wage Inequality in Argentina: The Role of Labour Formalization and Other Factors. Unpublished manuscript, Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento, Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
  2. Behrman, Jere R., and Susan W. Parker. 2011. The Impact of the PROGRESA/Oportunidades Conditional Cash Transfer Program on Health and Related Outcomes for the Aging in Mexico. Working Paper 34, University of Pennsylvania, Population Aging Research Center, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  3. Berg, Janine. 2009. Brazil Conditional Transfers as Response to the Crisis: The Bolsa Família Programme. ILO Notes on the Crisis, International Labour Office, Geneva.Google Scholar
  4. Bliss, Christopher, and Nicholas Stern. 1978. Productivity, Wages and Nutrition. Journal of Development Economics 5: 331–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boly, Amadou. 2015. On the Effects of Formalization on Taxes and Wages: Panel Evidence from Vietnam. Working Paper 42, United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  6. Borah, Kabita, and Rimjhim Bordoloi. 2014. MGNREGA and Its Impact on Daily Waged Women Workers: A Case Study of Sonitpur District of Assam. IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance 4 (4): 40–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brazil. Ministry of Social Welfare. 2011. Los desafíos de la seguridad social en Brasil en el contexto actual. Brasília: Secretary of Social Welfare Policies.Google Scholar
  8. Bruhn, Miriam, and David McKenzie. 2013a. Entry Regulation and Formalization of Microenterprises in Developing Countries. Policy Research Working Paper 6507, World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 2013b. Using Administrative Data to Evaluate Municipal Reforms: An Evaluation of the Impact of Minas Fácil Expresso. Policy Research Working Paper 6368, World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  10. Busso, Matías, Maria Victoria Fazio, and Santiago Levy Algazi. 2012. (In)Formal and (Un)Productive: The Productivity Costs of Excessive Informality in Mexico. Working Paper 341, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  11. Cao, Lan. 2012. Informal Institutions and Property Rights. Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference Journal 1: 263–279.Google Scholar
  12. Case, Anne, Victoria Hosegood, and Frances Lund. 2005. The Reach and Impact of Child Support Grants: Evidence from KwaZulu-Natal. Development Southern Africa 22 (4): 467–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Colombia. Confecámaras. 2011. Impacto de la formalización empresarial en Colombia. Colección Cuadernos de Análisis Económico no. 1, Confecámaras, Bogota.Google Scholar
  14. De Soto, Hernando. 1989. The Other Path: The Invisible Revolution in the Third World. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 2000. The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  16. Di Giorgio, Giacomo, and Aminur Rahman. 2013. SME Registration Evidence from a Randomised Control Trial in Bangladesh. Policy Research Working Paper 6382, World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  17. ECLAC (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean) and ILO (International Labour Organization). 2014. The Employment Situation in Latin America and the Caribbean: Employment Formalization and Labour Income Distribution. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  18. Fajnzylber, Pablo, William F. Maloney, and Gabriel V. Montes-Rojas. 2011. Does Formality Improve Micro-Firm Performance? Evidence from the Brazilian SIMPLES Program. Journal of Development Economics 94 (2): 262–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ghose, Ajit K. 2012. Addressing the Employment Challenge: India’s MGNREGA. Employment Working Paper 105, International Labour Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar
  20. ILO (International Labour Organization). 1972. Employment, Incomes and Equality: A Strategy of Increasing Productive Employment in Kenya. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 2002. Decent Work and the Informal Economy. Report VI submitted to the 90th Session of the International Labour Conference, Geneva, June.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 2004. Final Report of the 17th International Conference of Labour Statisticians. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 2011. Statistical Update on Employment in the Informal Economy. Geneva: International Labour Office, Department of Statistics.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 2013. Measuring Informality: A Statistical Manual on the Informal Sector and Informal Employment. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
  25. Jütting, Johannes P., and Juan R. de Laiglesia, eds. 2009. Is Informal Normal? Towards More and Better Jobs in Developing Countries. Paris: OECD Development Centre.Google Scholar
  26. La Porta, Rafael, and Andrei Shleifer. 2008. The Unofficial Economy and Economic Development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 39 (2): 275–352.Google Scholar
  27. La Porta, Rafael, and Andrei Shleifer. 2014. Informality and Development. Journal of Economic Perspectives 28 (3): 109–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lawry, Steven, Cyrus Samii, Ruth Hall, Aaron Leopold, Donna Hornby, and Farai Mtero. 2014. The Impact of Land Property Rights Interventions on Investment and Agricultural Productivity in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review. Campbell Systematic Review 1 Campbell Collaboration, Oslo.Google Scholar
  29. Leibenstein, Harvey. 1957. Economic Backwardness and Economic Growth. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Mahmood, Moazam, Dic Lo, and Yu Yongding. 2012. The Macro Drivers of Growth in China. Unpublished manuscript, International Labour Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar
  31. Maloney, William F. 2004. Informality Revisited. World Development 32 (7): 1159–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Maurizio, Roxana. 2015. Transitions to Formality and Declining Inequality: Argentina and Brazil in the 2000s. Development and Change 46 (5): 1047–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McGuire, James W. 2013. Conditional Cash Transfers in Bolivia: Origins, Impact, and Universality. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, San Francisco, April 3–6.Google Scholar
  34. McKenzie, David, and Yaye Seynabou Sakho. 2010. Does It Pay Firms to Register for Taxes? The Impact of Formality on Firm Profitability. Journal of Development Economics 91 (1): 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meth, Charles. 2011. Employer of Last Resort? South Africa’s Expanded Public Works Programme (EPWP). Working Paper 58, Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit, University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
  36. Mirrlees, James A. 1975. A Pure Theory of Underdeveloped Economies. In Agriculture in Development Theory, ed. Lloyd G. Reynolds, 84–106. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Myrdal, Gunnar. 1968. Asian Drama: An Inquiry into the Poverty of Nations. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  38. Neri, Marcelo, and Adriana Fontes. 2010. Informalidad y trabajo en Brasil: Causas, consecuencias y políticas públicas. Cadernos Adenauer 11 (2): 16–23.Google Scholar
  39. Portes, Alejandro, Manuel Castells, and Lauren A. Benton. 1989. The Informal Economy: Studies in Advanced and Less Developed Countries. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Rand, John, and Nina Torm. 2012. The Benefits of Formalization: Evidence from Vietnamese Manufacturing SMEs. World Development 40 (5): 983–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Santiago, Silas. 2011. Microempresas e empresas de pequeno porte: Brasil: A experiência do Simples Nacional e do Microempreendedor Individual. Unpublished manuscript, Comitê Gestor do Simples Nacional, Brasília.Google Scholar
  42. Stiglitz, Joseph E. 1976. The Efficiency Wage Hypothesis, Surplus Labour, and the Distribution of Income in LDCs. Oxford Economic Papers 28 (2): 185–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Trebilcock, Anne. 2005. Decent Work and the Informal Economy. Discussion Paper 4, United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  44. Universidad Externado de Colombia. 2011. ¿La ley 1429 de 2010 ha formalizado el empleo en Colombia? Boletín del observatorio del mercado de trabajo y la seguridad no. 13, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Bogota.Google Scholar
  45. van Elk, Koos, Jan de Kok, Jessica Duran, and Gert-Jan Lindeboom. 2013. Improving the Formalisation of Informal Enterprises: A Search for Case Studies. Unpublished manuscript, Panteia, Zoetermeer.Google Scholar
  46. ———. 2014. Enterprise Formalization: Fact or Fiction? A Quest for Case Studies. Research paper, International Labour Organization (ILO) and Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, Geneva and Eschborn.Google Scholar
  47. Wetzel, Deborah. 2013. Bolsa Família: Brazil’s Quiet Revolution. World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/opinion/2013/11/04/bolsa-familia-Brazil-quiet-revolution. Accessed on 5 December 2017.
  48. World Bank. 2014. A Model from Mexico for the World. World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2014/11/19/un-modelo-de-mexico-para-el-mundo. Accessed on 5 December 2017.
  49. Yiengprugsawan, Vasoontara, Mathew Kelly, Sam-ang Seubsman, and Adrien C. Sleigh. 2010. The First 10 Years of the Universal Coverage Scheme in Thailand: Review of its Impact on Health Inequalities and Lessons Learnt for Middle-Income Countries. Australasian Epidemiologist 17 (3): 24–26.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Moazam Mahmood
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Lahore School of EconomicsLahore, PunjabPakistan
  2. 2.Capital University of Economics and BusinessBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations