Advertisement

The Role of Universities to Promote Sustainable Practices and Climate Change Adaptation: Analysis of the 22 Conferences of the Parties Using Text Mining

  • Issa I. Berchin
  • Sthefanie A. da Silva
  • Flávio Ceci
  • George M. Gabriel
  • Talita C. Anhalt
  • José B. S. O. A. Guerra
Chapter
Part of the World Sustainability Series book series (WSUSE)

Abstract

Higher education institutions have a critical role in shaping societies by educating future leaders to think critically and solve problems, especially in a changing climate context and with many sustainability challenges. Therefore, these institutions play a key role in educating about climate change and sustainability, how to adapt to it and mitigate its effects, through knowledge creation and dissemination, through research, education and community outreach. The aim of this paper is to analyze through text mining the 22 Conferences of the Parties (COPs)’ documents to understand the role of universities to promote sustainable practices and climate change adaptation. This analysis demonstrates that terms related to the goals of higher education institutions (i.e. education and research, but also outreach) are at the core of the debates at the COPs, from education to innovation, research, learning, capacity building, awareness, knowledge, and so on. Thus, the COPs also call for sustainable development, which would be achieved by engaging civil society, creating and disseminating knowledge, building capacities, developing technologies and transforming them into innovations. This would engage the private sector, raising funds to finance the process, to promote a sustainable and resilient society to climate change, not only in the short term, but also in the long term.

Keywords

Sustainable development Higher education institutions Universities’ campuses Living labs Climate change Text mining 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was conducted by the Research Center for Energy Efficiency and Sustainability (Greens), from the University of Southern Santa Catarina (Unisul), in the context of the project Building Resilience in a Dynamic Global Economy: Complexity across scales in the Brazilian Food-Water-Energy Nexus (BRIDGE), funded by the Newton Fund, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Estado de Santa Catarina and the Research Councils United Kingdom (RCUK).

References

  1. Adomßent, M., Fischer, D., Godemann, J., Herzig, C., Otte, I., Rieckmannn, M., et al. (2014). Emerging areas in research on higher education for sustainable development e management education, sustainable consumption and perspectives from Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Cleaner Production, 62, 1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azeiteiro, U. M., Bacelar-Nicolau, P., Caetano, F. J. P., & Caeiro, S. (2015). Education for sustainable development through e-learning in higher education: Experiences from Portugal. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 308–319.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bantanur, S., Mukherjee, M., & Shankar, R. (2015). Emerging dimensions of sustainability in institutes of higher education in India. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 4, 323–329.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2015.03.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ceci, F., Pietrobon, R., & Gonçalves, A. L. (2012). Turning text into research networks: Information retrieval and computational ontologies in the creation of scientific databases. PLoS ONE, 7, e27499.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. CETESB. (2017a). A Convenção Sobre As Mudanças Climáticas. Available at http://proclima.cetesb.sp.gov.br/conferencias/a-convencao-sobre-mudancas-climaticas/. Accessed on June 14, 2017.
  6. CETESB. (2017b). COP 16/ MOP 6 – Cancun, México (2010). Available at http://proclima.cetesb.sp.gov.br/conferencias/negociacoes-internacionais/conferencia-das-partes-cop/cop-16-mop-6-cancun-mexico-dezembro-de-2010/>. Accessed on June 14, 2017.
  7. CETESB. (2017c). COP 20/CMP 10 – Lima, Peru (2014). Available at http://proclima.cetesb.sp.gov.br/conferencias/negociacoes-internacionais/conferencia-das-partes-cop/cop-20cmp-10-lima-peru-dezembro-de-2014/>. Accessed on June 14, 2017.
  8. Coffman, M. (2009). University leadership in island climate change mitigation. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 10(3), 239–249.  https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370910972558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cortese, A. D. (2003). The critical role of higher education in creating a sustainable future. Planning for Higher Education, 31, 15–22. Available at http://www.aashe.org/resources/pdf/Cortese_PHE.pdf. Accessed on April 03, 2016.
  10. Cosgrave, E., Arbuthnot, K., & Tryfonas, T. (2013). Living labs, innovation districts and information marketplaces: A systems approach for smart cities. Procedia Computer Science, 16, 668–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davison, A., Brown, P., Pharo, E., Warr, K., McGregor, H., Terkes, S., et al. (2013). Distributed leadership: Building capacity for interdisciplinary climate change teaching at four universities. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 15(1), 98–110.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-10-2012-0091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Earth Negotiations Bulletin. (1995). Summary of the First Conference of the Parties for the Framework Convention on Climate Change: 28 March–7 April 1995. IISD, Vol. 12, no. 21, Monday, April 10, 1995.Google Scholar
  13. Earth Negotiations Bulletin. (1996). Summary of the Second Conference of the Parties to the Framework Convention on Climate Change: 8–19 July 1996. IISD, v. 12, n. 38, Monday, July 22, 1996.Google Scholar
  14. Evans, J., & Karvonen, A. (2012). Living laboratories for sustainability: Exploring the politics and epistemology of urban transition. Cities and Low Carbon Transitions, pp. 126–141.Google Scholar
  15. Evans, J., Jones, R., Karvonen, K., Millard, L., & Wendler, J. (2015). Living labs and co-production: University campuses as platforms for sustainability science. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 16, 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.06.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fahey, S. J. (2012). Curriculum change and climate change: Inside outside pressures in higher education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(5), 703–722.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.679011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gómez, F. U., Sáez-Navarrete, C., Lioi, S. R., & Marzuca, V. I. (2015). Adaptable model for assessing sustainability in higher education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 475–485.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gruber, J. S., Rhoades, J. L., Simpson, M., Stack, L., Yetka, L., & Wood, R. (2017). Enhancing climate change adaptation: Strategies for community engagement and university-community partnerships. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 7(1), 10–24.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0232-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guerra, J. B. S. O. A., Garcia, J., Lima, M. A., Barbosa, S. B., Heerdt, M. L., & Berchin, I. I. (2016). A proposal of a balanced scorecard for an environmental education program at universities. Journal of Cleaner Production (In Press), pp. 1–39  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.179.
  20. IISD Reporting Services. (2015). Summary of the Bonn Climate Change Conference: 31 August–4 September 2015. Earth Negotiations Bulletin. Bonn, Vol. 12, no. 644, 2015.Google Scholar
  21. Klein-Banai, C., & Theis, T. L. (2011). An urban university’s ecological footprint and the effect of climate change. Ecological Indicators, 11, 857–860.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.11.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Knuth, S., Nagle, B., Steuer, C., & Yarnal, B. (2007). universities and climate change mitigation: Advancing grassroots climate policy in the US. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, 12(5), 485–504.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13549830701657059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lambrechts, W., Mulà, I., Ceulemans, K., Molderez, I., & Gaeremynck, V. (2013). The integration of competences for sustainable development in higher education: An analysis of bachelor programs in management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 65–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leal Filho, W., & Brandli, L. (2016). Engaging stakeholders for sustainable development. In W. Leal Filho, & L. Brandli (Eds.) Engaging stakeholders in education for sustainable development at university level, World Sustainability Series  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26734-0_21.Google Scholar
  25. Leal Filho, W., Shiel, C., & do Paço, A. (2016). Implementing and operationalising integrative approaches to sustainability in higher education: The role of project-oriented learning. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 126–135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., & Nyström, A. G. (2012). Living labs as open-innovation networks. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9), 6–11.Google Scholar
  27. Lozano, R., Ceulemans, K., Alonso-Almeida, M., Huisingh, D., Lozano, F. J., Waas, T., et al. (2015). A review of commitment and implementation of sustainable development in higher education: Results from a worldwide survey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lozano, R., Lukman, R., Lozano, F. J., Huisingh, D., & Lambrechts, W. (2013). Declarations for sustainability in higher education: Becoming better leaders, through addressing the university system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 10–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ramos, T. B., Caeiro, S., Hoof, B., Lozano, R., Huisingh, D., & Ceulemans, K. (2015). Experiences from the implementation of sustainable development in higher education institutions: Environmental Management for Sustainable Universities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 3–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Senbel, M., Ngo, D., & Blair, E. (2014). Social mobilization of climate change: University students conserving engagement. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 84–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Steiner, G., & Posch, A. (2006). Higher education for sustainability by means of transdisciplinar case studies: An innovative approach for solving complex, real-world problems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 877–890.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stephens, J. C., & Graham, A. C. (2010). Toward an empirical research agenda for sustainability in higher education: Exploring the transition management framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 611–618.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.07.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Trencher, G., Yarime, M., McCormick, K. B., Doll, C. N. H., & Kraines, S. B. (2014). Beyond the third mission: Exploring the emerging university function of co-creation for sustainability. Science and Public Policy, 41, 151–179.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. ULSF. (1990). About USLF. Available at http://www.ulsf.org/about.html. Accessed on July 08, 2016.
  35. UNFCCC. (1995). Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its First Session, Held at Berlin from 28 March to 7 April 1995. Available at http://unfccc.int/cop4/resource/docs/cop1/07.pdf. Accessed on June 13, 2017.
  36. UNFCCC. (1996). Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its Second Session, Held at Geneva from 8 to 19 July 1996. Available at http://unfccc.int/cop4/resource/docs/cop2/15.pdf. Accessed on June 13, 2017.
  37. UNFCCC. (1997). Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its Third Session, Held at Kyoto from 1 to 11 December 1997. Available at http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/cop3/07.pdf. Accessed on June 13, 2017.
  38. UNFCCC. (1998). Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its Fourth Session, Held at Buenos Aires from 2 to 14 November 1998. Available at http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/cop4/16.pdf. Accessed on June 13, 2017.
  39. UNFCCC. (1999). Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its Fifth Session, Held at Bonn from 25 October to 5 November 1999. Available at http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/cop5/06.pdf. Accessed on June 13, 2017.
  40. UNFCCC. (2000). Report of the Conference of the Parties on the First Part of Its Sixth Session, Held at The Hague from 13 to 25 November 2000. Available at http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/cop6/05.pdf. Accessed on June 13, 2017.
  41. UNFCCC. (2001). Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its Seventh Session, Held at Marrakesh from 29 October to 10 November 2001. Available at http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/cop7/13a01.pdf. Accessed on June 13, 2017.
  42. UNFCCC. (2016). COP 22. Available at http://unfccc.int/meetings/marrakech_nov_2016/session/9676/php/view/documents.php. Accessed on June 13, 2017.
  43. UNFCCC. (2017a). United Nations framework convention on climate change. What is the COP? Available at http://unfccc.int/bodies/body/6383.php. Accessed on June 13, 2017.
  44. UNFCCC. (2017b). First steps to a safer future: Introducing the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Available at http://unfccc.int/essential_background/convention/items/6036.php. Accessed on June 13, 2017.
  45. Waas, T., Verbruggen, A., & Wright, T. (2010). University research for sustainable development: Definition and characteristics explored. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 629–636.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wachholz, S., Artz, N., & Chene, D. (2014). Students’ perceptions of education for sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 15(2), 242–253.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-09-2012-0079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Waheed, B., Khan, F., Veitch, B., & Hawboldt, K. (2011). Uncertainty-based quantitative assessment of sustainability for higher education institutions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19, 720–732.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.12.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Witteveen, L., Eweg, R., Smits, T., & Voskamp-Harkema, W. (2016). Design principles for Living Lab’s aiming at sustainable development: The role of higher education in Living Lab’s. Competence 2016 Wageningen, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
  49. Yuan, X., & Zuo, J. (2013). A critical assessment of the higher education for sustainable development from students’ perspectives—A Chinese study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 108–115.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Issa I. Berchin
    • 1
  • Sthefanie A. da Silva
    • 1
  • Flávio Ceci
    • 1
  • George M. Gabriel
    • 2
  • Talita C. Anhalt
    • 1
  • José B. S. O. A. Guerra
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Center for Energy Efficiency and Sustainability (Greens)University of Southern Santa Catarina (Unisul)FlorianopolisBrazil
  2. 2.Department of German and Russian StudiesCollege of CharlestonCharlestonUSA

Personalised recommendations