Allocation of Ancillary Service Costs to Distributed Generators

Chapter

Abstract

As an increasing amount of the electricity generated from renewable energy sources (RES-E) is fed into the power grid, various problems, such as frequency and voltage instability in the power system, occur more frequently. To address this problem, a system operator provides ancillary services such as balancing electricity supply and demand and procuring reactive power supply. Accordingly, the cost of ancillary services should be appropriately allocated to distributed generators of RES-E. This chapter proposes a method for solving this cost allocation problem. The method proposed is an application of the Aumann–Shapley (A–S) rule, which is one of cost sharing rules among multiple entities. If an ancillary service cost is expressed as a function of an electricity output vector, each element of which corresponds to each distributed generator, the cost share of a distributed generator will be computed based on the A–S rule. The difficulty of this method lies in how to obtain an ancillary service cost function. This chapter proposes that parametric linear programming be used to form that cost function, and we explain this computation method. The method may be useful for designing a new type of feed-in tariff system, which will be necessary after a diffusion goal is achieved under the current feed-in tariff system.

Keywords

Distributed generator Ancillary service Aumann–shapley rule Parametric linear programming Feed-in tariff 

References

  1. Aumann RJ, Shapley LS (1974) Values of non-atomic games. Princeton University Press, PrincetonMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Billera LJ, Heath DC, Raanan J (1978) Internal telephone billing rates: a novel application of non-atomic game theory. Oper Res 26(6):956–965CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Choi JY, Rim S-H, Park J-K (1998) Optimal real time pricing of real and reactive powers. IEEE Power Syst 13(4):1226–1231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hougaard JL (2009) An introduction to allocation rules. Springer, BerlinCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Hougaard JL, Tind J (2009) Cost allocation and convex data envelopment. Eur J Oper Res 194:939–947MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Kirschen D, Strbac G (2004) Fundamentals of power system economics. Wiley, West SussexCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Koide A, Tsuji T, Oyama T, Hashiguchi T, Goda T, Shinji T, Tsujita S (2012) A study on real-time pricing method of reactive power in voltage profile control method of future distribution network. IEEJ Trans Power Energ 132(4):359–370 (In Japanese with the English abstract)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lin XJ, Yu CW, Chung CY (2005) Pricing of reactive support ancillary services. IEE Proc-C 152(5):616–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lin XJ, Yu CW, David AK, Chung CY, Wu H, Xu N (2006a) A novel market-based reactive power management scheme. Adv Mater Res-Switz 28:127–132Google Scholar
  10. Lin XJ, Yu CW, Xu N, Chung CY, Wu H (2006b) Reactive power service cost allocation using Aumann-Shapley method. IEE Proc-C 153(5):540–546Google Scholar
  11. Stoft S (2002) Power system economics. Wiley–IEEE Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Ueki Y, Hara R, Kita H, Hasegawa J (2008) Evaluation of contribution for voltage control ancillary services based on social surplus. IEEJ Trans Power Energ 128(10):1243–1251 (In Japanese with the English abstract)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Takasaki City University of EconomicsTakasakiJapan

Personalised recommendations