Advertisement

Instrumentation Seismology in India

  • Atindra Kumar Shukla
  • Ravi Kant Singh
  • Rajesh Prakash
Chapter

Abstract

In India, instrumental seismology started more than a century ago, with the first seismological observatory of the country with analog equipment set up at Alipore (Kolkata) by the India Meteorological Department (IMD) in 1898. Since then lot of development has taken place in all the components of instrumental seismology, i.e., sensing the true ground motion, recording of ground motion with synchronized timing, and networking for real-time reliable communication, due to the advancement in development of digital technology. Concept of networking has also changed, and several seismic networks are now in operation with different objectives and making use of different networking concepts. All these aspects are briefly discussed. The India Meteorological Department (IMD) is the nodal agency for monitoring of earthquake activity in and around the country and operating several networks for monitoring of local, regional, and large-magnitude undersea earthquakes capable of generating tsunamis. Among these, a local network for precise monitoring of earthquake activity in the northeast region of the country has recently been set up. Besides IMD, seismic networks are also being operated by several institutions with specific objectives. Some of these networks are also briefly discussed.

Keywords

Seismological instrumentation Seismic hazard Sensors Broadband Digitizer Telemetry 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks to all officers and staff associated in setting up of Seismic Networks in India Meteorological Department, particularly, Delhi Seismic Telemetry and NE Seismic Telemetry Networks.

References

  1. Bhattacharya, S. N., & Dattatrayam, R. S. (2000). Recent advances in seismic instrumentation and data interpretation in India. Current Science, 79(9), 1347–1358.Google Scholar
  2. Bhattacharya, S. N., Shukla, A. K., Prakash, R., Gautam, J. L., & Verma R. K. (2001a). Seismicity of National Capital Territory Delhi. Proceedings of International Conference on Earthquake Strategies with Particular Reference to India, New Delhi, 1–10.Google Scholar
  3. Bhattacharya, S. N., Srivastav, S. K., Dattatrayam, R. S., Shukla, A. K., Baidya, P. R. & Suresh, G. (2001b). Seismic monitoring and data processing system. Proceedings of Seismic Hazards, 231–238.Google Scholar
  4. Bungum, H., Mykkeltveit, S., & Kvaerna, T. (1985). Seismic noise in Fennoscandia, with emphasis on high frequencies. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 75, 1489–1513.Google Scholar
  5. Dattatrayam, R. S., Bhatnagar, A. K., Suresh, G., Baidya, P. R. & Gautam, J. L. (2009). Real time earthquake monitoring for early warning of Tsunamis in Indian Ocean region. Mausam, Diamond Jubilee Volume, 253–264.Google Scholar
  6. Fusca, I. (1957). Navy wants industry to share burden of solion development. Aviation Week, 66(26), 37.Google Scholar
  7. Hansen, R. A., Bungum, H., & Alsaker, A. (1989). Three recent larger earthquakes offshore Norway. Terra Nova, 1, 284–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Havskov, J., & Alguacil, G. (2002). Instrumentation in earthquake seismology. Springer, 358.Google Scholar
  9. Havskov, J., & Bungum, H. (1987). Source parameters for earthquakes in the northern North Sea. Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift, 67, 51–58.Google Scholar
  10. Hurd, R. M., & Lane, R. N. (1957). Principles of very low power electrochemical control devices. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 104, 727–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kvaerna, T., & Mykkeltveit, S. (1985). Propagation characteristics of regional phases recorded at NORSAR. NORSAR Semiannual Technical Summary, April–September 1985, NORSAR, Kjeller, Norway, 21–29.Google Scholar
  12. Kvamme, L. B., & Hansen, R. A. (1989). The seismicity in the continental margin areas of Northern Norway. In S. Gregersen & P. W. Basham (Eds.), Earthquakes at North Atlantic passive margins: Neotectonics and postglacial rebound, Hingham, MA: Kluwer, 429–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Larkam, C. W. (1965). Theoretical analysis of the Solion polarized cathode acoustic linear transducer. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 37, 664–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ottemoller, L., & Havskov, J. (1999). Seisnet: A general purpose virtual seismic network. Seismological Research Letters, 70(5), 522–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shukla A. K., Prakash, R., Shukla H. P., & Bhattacharya, S. N. (2001). Digital seismic VSAT based telemetry system for National Capital Region: A Perspective. Proceedings of 32nd IETE Mid-Term Symposium, 10–17.Google Scholar
  16. Shukla, A. K., Prakash, R., Shukla, H. P., Gupta, H. V., Bhattachaya, S. N., & Srivastava, S. K. (2002). Delhi Seismic Telemetry Network and analysis of digital waveform data collected through this network. Proceedings of 12th Symposium on Earthquake Engineering, IIT Roorkee, 105–113.Google Scholar
  17. Shukla, A. K., Prakash, R., Pandey, A. P., Singh, R. K., Mandal, H. S., Singh, D., & Baidya, P.R. (2011). Overview of seismic hazard and mitigation in North East India Region. IMD Publication.Google Scholar
  18. Srivastav, S. K., Bhattacharya, S. N., Shukla, A. K., Shukla, H. P., Baidya, P. R., & Dua, S. C. (2001). Near real time seismic monitoring system in and around National Capital Region Delhi. Proceedings of Seismic Hazards, 221–230.Google Scholar
  19. Srivastava, S. K., Bhattacharya, S. N., Gupta, H. V., Dattatrayam, R. S., Shukla, A. K., Baidya, P. R., Prakash, R., Suresh, G., Shula, H.P., Ghose, A.K., Singh, H., Kondal, J.S., Gautam, J.L., Dua, S.C. & Ravindran, V.V. (2003). Recent developments in seismic monitoring and analysis capabilities in India. Geological Society of India, Memoir, 54, 231–251.Google Scholar
  20. Wittenborn, A. F. (1959). Analysis of a logarithmic solion acoustic pressure detector. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 31, 474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Atindra Kumar Shukla
    • 1
  • Ravi Kant Singh
    • 1
  • Rajesh Prakash
    • 1
  1. 1.India Meteorological DepartmentNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations