Portfolio Careers and a New Common Cause: The Conditions for Screen Workers in Peru

  • Sarah Barrow
Part of the Global Cinema book series (GLOBALCINE)


The development of cinema in Peru tells a story that reflects the precarious nature of the relationship between government and cultural producers. Throughout its first century, Peruvian cinema enjoyed just a few brief moments of apparently emerging stability, dashed each time by legislative action and/or sociopolitical unrest. In the 1990s, an increasingly neoliberal economic climate and restrictions resulting from the remnants of harsh political violence of the 1980s gave rise to even more challenging circumstances for filmmakers in Peru. Indeed, John King’s observation that “local production remained intermittent” (2000: 281) during that time was something of an understatement. None of this was helped by the abrupt repealing in the early 1990s of a cinema law established in 1972 that included incentives, quotas, and subsidies designed to develop an infrastructure for national cinema production. This chapter explores the impact of these legislative actions on film in Peru, with a focus on the period between 1992 and 2016 when the situation for filmmakers was particularly challenging and with a new government just elected bringing fresh uncertainty. It reflects on the various responses to the changes in state support, in particular on the attempts by producers to patch together mosaics of funding sources that rely less and less on the state. It asks whether we should still perceive of filmmaking in Peru as a situation of “crisis” given the relative boom in production and exhibition of homegrown cinema in recent years, and what form that crisis now takes.

Works Cited

  1. Bedoya, Ricardo. 100 años de cine en el Perú: Una historia crítica. 2nd edition. Lima: Universidad de Lima, 1995.Google Scholar
  2. Bedoya, Ricardo, and Isaac León Frías. “Volver a vivir: cronología (accidentada) de la ley de cine.” La Gran Ilusión 3 (1994): 108–110.Google Scholar
  3. Bedoya, Ricardo, and León Frías, Isaac. “Entrevista con Armando Robles Godoy.” La Gran Ilusión 6 (1996): 101.Google Scholar
  4. Berg, Heather, and Constance Penley. “Creative Precarity in the Adult Film Industry.” In Precarious Creativity: Global Media, Local Labor, edited by Michael Curtin and Kevin Sanson, 159–171. Oakland: University of California Press, 2016.Google Scholar
  5. Carbone, Giancarlo. El cine en el Perú: el cortometraje 1972–1992. Lima: University of Lima, 2007.Google Scholar
  6. Cavello Limas, Edwin. “Esta es la campaña de un grupo de cineastas que está detrás del señor Moscoso.” Limagris. December 22, 2012.
  7. Curtin, Michael, and Kevin Sanson. Precarious Creativity: Global Media, Local Labor. Oakland: University of California Press, 2016.Google Scholar
  8. Deuze, Mark. Media Work. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007.Google Scholar
  9. Gellner, Ernest. Nations and Nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell, 1983.Google Scholar
  10. Hartley, John, ed. Creative Industries. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2005.Google Scholar
  11. Johnson, Randal. “Film Policy in Latin America.” In Film Policy: International, National and Regional Perspectives, edited by Albert Moran, 128–147. London and New York: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
  12. King, John. Magical Reels: A History of Cinema in Latin America. London: Verso, 2000.Google Scholar
  13. Leira, Milagros. “Entrevista con Robles Godoy.” El Comercio, November 22, 1998, 16–17.Google Scholar
  14. León Frías, Isaac. “Peru.” In Variety International Film Guide 2003: The Ultimate Annual Review of World Cinema, edited by Peter Cowie, 266–267. London: Button Publishing, 2004.Google Scholar
  15. León Frías, Isaac. “Peru.” In Variety International Film Guide 2004: The Ultimate Annual Review of World Cinema, edited by Peter Cowie, 234–235. London: Button Publishing, 2005.Google Scholar
  16. Martínez, Gabriela. “Independent Filmmaking in the Peruvian Context: Seeking Meaning.” In Independent Filmmaking Around the Globe, edited by Doris Baltruschat and Mary P. Erickson, 90–109. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2015.Google Scholar
  17. Middents, Jeffrey. Writing National Cinema: Film Journals and Film Culture in Peru. Hanover: University Press of New England, 2009.Google Scholar
  18. Neilson, Brett, and Ned Rossiter. “From Precarity to Precariousness and Back Again: Labour, Life and Unstable Networks.” Fibreculture 5 (2005).
  19. Perla Anaya, José. Censura y promoción en el cine/Censorship and Promotion of Cinema. Lima: Deyco Instituto Peruano de Derecho de las Comunicaciones, 1991.Google Scholar
  20. Planas, Enrique. “What Can We Expect from PPK’s Minister for Culture.” El Comercio, July 1, 2016.
  21. Puga, José. “Made in Perú: la ley de cinematografía peruana y retos de la producción nacional.” Butacaenlinea, November 2, 2009.
  22. Rebaza, Claudia, ed. Los tres primeros años: Memoria 1996–1998. Lima: Conacine, 1998.Google Scholar
  23. Schnitman, Jorge. Film Industries in Latin America: Dependency and Development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation, 1984.Google Scholar
  24. Thorpe, Rosemary, and Geoffrey Bertram. Peru: 1890–1977: Growth and Policy in an Open Economy. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  25. Vandoorne, Pierre Emile. “Balance 2015.” November 12, 2015.
  26. Velasco, Víctor Ruíz, and Pierre Vandoorne, Pierre Emile. “Incidir en la cultura es incidir en la generación de valores communes.” April 27, 2014.
  27. Wiener, Christian. “Tan duro de vivir, tan duro de morir: el cine en el Perú de los 1990.” In Changing Reels: Latin American Cinema Against the Odds, edited by Rob Rix and Roberto Rodríguez-Saona, 17–32. Leeds Iberian Papers: University of Leeds, 1997.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah Barrow
    • 1
  1. 1.University of East AngliaNorwichUK

Personalised recommendations