Advertisement

The Never-Ending Movie: Precariousness and Self-reflexivity in Contemporary Argentine Cinema

  • Beatriz Urraca
Chapter
Part of the Global Cinema book series (GLOBALCINE)

Abstract

Resulting from a deep economic crisis, the New Argentine Cinema made precariousness an aesthetic resource; many recent independent films continue to echo the precarious conditions of the industry with self-reflexive modalities that intersect with other arts, with national history, and with the films of earlier eras to explore the dynamics of a creative process in an unpredictable economy. This chapter analyzes the occupational complexities of the film worker in Argentina, and explores how a film’s self-reflexivity illuminates the concept of precariousness and the relationships between materiality, economics, and cultural work. The theoretical framework is informed by García Canclini’s research on how a young generation of cultural workers defined by precariousness combines uncertainty and “connecting capitalism,” innovation, and interculturality; Rosalind Gill and Andy Pratt’s work on precariousness as the defining trait of cultural work in contemporary times; and Susan Christofferson and Katie Milestone’s reflections on gender and precariousness in cultural work. The film analysis revolves around Un rey para la Patagonia (Turturro, 2011), which deals with the present of filmmaking as it attempts to account for the unfinished works of the past, establishing links with older films, literature, drama, history, and art to highlight the precariousness present in its own contemporary creative processes. This chapter explores how, in this particular instance, self-reflexivity turns into a critical tool to interrogate the status of Argentine cinema and cultural production, and to delve into the artistic dimensions of economic precariousness.

Works Cited

  1. Aguilar, Gonzalo. Otros mundos. Buenos Aires: Santiago Arcos, 2006.Google Scholar
  2. Aguilar, Gonzalo. “Filmmaking.” In Directory of World Cinema: Argentina, vol. II, edited by Beatriz Urraca and Gary M. Kramer, 233–236. Bristol: Intellect, 2016.Google Scholar
  3. Barrionuevo, Cecilia, Edgardo Dieleke, and Julieta Mortati. Prologue to Las Naves 4 (2014): 6–8.Google Scholar
  4. Bernades, Horacio. Review of Un rey para la Patagonia. Página/12. October 20, 2011. Accessed August 5, 2016. http://www.pagina12.com.ar/diario/suplementos/espectaculos/5-23252-2011-10-20.html.
  5. Burak, Daniel. Bar ‘El Chino.’ Buenos Aires: Primer Plano, 2003.Google Scholar
  6. Cangi, Adrián. “Poética de la luz, política del gesto.” Nomadías, no. 14 (2011): 157–169.Google Scholar
  7. Ferrer, Christian. Camafeos. Sobre algunas figuras excéntricas, desconcertantes o inadaptadas. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Godot, 2015.Google Scholar
  8. Frenkel, Nestor. Amateur. Buenos Aires: Vamosviendo Cine, 2011.Google Scholar
  9. García Canclini, Néstor. “Economía creativa y trabajos precarios.” Presentation at the Segundo Foro de Empresas Culturales y Creativas, Xalapa, Veracruz. July 13, 2015. Accessed August 5, 2016. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ly8V9_cg9X0.
  10. García Canclini, Néstor. “Creativos, precarios y nuevas formas de interculturalidad.” Etnoantropologia, no. 13 (2015): 2. Accessed August 5, 2016. http://rivisteclueb.it/riviste/index.php/etnoantropologia/article/view/197/325.
  11. García Canclini, Néstor and Maritza Urteaga Castro Pozo, eds. Cultura y de-sarrollo: Una visión distinta desde los jóvenes. Madrid: Fundación Carolina, 2011.Google Scholar
  12. Gill, Rosalind and Andy Pratt. “Precarity and Cultural Work in the Social Factory? Immaterial Labour, Precariousness and Cultural Work.” Theory, Culture & Society 25, no. 7–8 (2008): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Giralt, Santiago, Camila Toker and Tamae Garateguy. UPA! Una película argentina. Buenos Aires: Upa Films, 2007.Google Scholar
  14. Kramer, Gary M. “Interview with Matías Piñeiro.” In Directory of World Cinema: Argentina, vol. II, edited by Beatriz Urraca and Gary M. Kramer, 47–52. Bristol: Intellect, 2016.Google Scholar
  15. Minujín, Juan. Vaquero. Buenos Aires: INCAA, 2011.Google Scholar
  16. Moguillansky, Alejo and Sandlund, Fia-Stina. El escarabajo de oro o Victorias Hämnd. Buenos Aires: El Pampero Cine, 2014.Google Scholar
  17. Nichols, Bill. Representing Reality: Issues and Concepts in Documentary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  18. Page, Joanna. Crisis and Capitalism in Contemporary Argentine Cinema. Durham: Duke University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Palavecino, Santiago. Otra vuelta. Buenos Aires: Sigma Cine, 2004.Google Scholar
  20. Ross, Andrew. “The New Geography of Work. Power to the Precarious?” Theory, Culture, and Society 25, no. 7–8 (2008): 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Russo, Sebastián. “Un desierto para/de monarcas. Apuntes en torno a Un rey para la Patagonia.” Marienbad. Revista de Cine (2012). Accessed August 5, 2016. http://www.marienbad.com.ar/critica/un-rey-para-la-patagonia.
  22. Soriano, Griselda. “Reflexividad y autorreferencia.” In Documental/Ficción. Reflexiones sobre el cine argentino contemporáneo, edited by Diana Paladino, 85–103. Buenos Aires: EDUNTREF, 2014.Google Scholar
  23. Sorín, Carlos. La película del rey. Motion Pictures, 1986.Google Scholar
  24. Trapero, Pablo. Nómade. Buenos Aires: Pablo Trapero, 2010.Google Scholar
  25. Turturro, Lucas. Un rey para la Patagonia. Buenos Aires: Universidad del Cine, 2011.Google Scholar
  26. Wolf, Sergio. Viviré con tu recuerdo. Buenos Aires: Sergio Wolf, 2016.Google Scholar
  27. Zylberman, Lior. “Critique of Un rey para la Patagonia.” In Directory of World Cinema: Argentina, vol. II, edited by Beatriz Urraca and Gary M. Kramer, 249–250. Bristol: Intellect, 2016.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Beatriz Urraca
    • 1
  1. 1.Widener UniversityChester, PAUSA

Personalised recommendations