Advertisement

Pantelion: Neoliberalism and Media in the Age of Precarization

  • Ignacio M. Sánchez Prado
Chapter
Part of the Global Cinema book series (GLOBALCINE)

Abstract

A joint venture between Mexican media company Televisa and Lionsgate, Pantelion is a film production and distribution venture aimed at US Latino audiences. Its catalog, however, departs from historical traditions of Latino and Chicano film in the United States, and its model of business more clearly resembles the aesthetics and ideologies developed by Mexican television and cinema in the neoliberal era. This paper discusses the way in which Pantelion films—both the ones produced in the United States and the ones imported from Mexico—participate in a new logic of neoliberalization of precarity. In other words, Pantelion productions reflect many of the economic and political concerns of the Latino community—such as economic justice and immigration—and its cultural traditions, but this reflection does not articulate a political stance, but rather a narrative that reconciles these economic difficulties in languages compatible with ideologies of meritocracy, racial hierarchy, and middle-class respectability identifiable with neoliberalism. This chapter seeks to show that the commoditization and representation of Latino issues in Pantelion’s catalog ultimately engage narratives where individuality, creativity, and other cultural ideologies deactivate communal and identitarian ideologies present in previous film and promote an idea of the Latino community as participating in a free-market society. The paper also aims to discuss the way in which these aesthetics of precarization have been essential to the current success of the studio. To illustrate these points, the chapter compares early films that participated in more traditional Latino cinema tropes, such as the representation of growing-up stories of young Latina women facing economic marginalization in films such as From Prada to Nada (Ángel Gracia, 2011), Girl in Progress (Patricia Riggen, 2012), and Filly Brown (Youssef Delara and Michael D. Olmos, 2012), and the role that Mexican neoliberal cinema and Televisa played in the reconfiguration of the studio’s ideologies, using the example of Instructions not Included (Eugenio Derbez, 2013).

Works Cited

  1. Anuario estadístico del cine mexicano 2016. México: Instituto Mexicano de Cinematografía, 2017.Google Scholar
  2. Barnes, Brooks. “Lionsgate and Televisa Unite on Films.” The New York Times. September 13, 2010. https://nyti.ms/2qYBYe1.
  3. Brown, Wendy. Undoing the Demos. Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2015.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, Pierre. Acts of Resistance… Against the Tyranny of the Market. New York: The New Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  5. Cardoso, Patricia. Real Women Have Curves. LaVoo Productions. 2002.Google Scholar
  6. Córdoba, José de. “Televisa to Take Stake in Univision.” The Wall Street Journal. October 5, 2010.Google Scholar
  7. De la Fuente, Anne Marie. “Lionsgate, Televisa Mull Distribution.” Variety. January 16, 2009. http://variety.com/2009/film/news/lionsgate-televisa-mull-distribution-1117998701.
  8. Delara, Youssef. Filly Brown. Santa Monica, CA: Pantelion. 2013.Google Scholar
  9. Derbez, Eugenio. Instructions Not Included. Santa Mónica, CA: Pantelion, 2013.Google Scholar
  10. “Filly Brown.” Reel Spirituality. January 24, 2012. http://www.brehmcenter.com/initiatives/reelspirituality/film/sundance/filly_brown.
  11. Figueroa, María P. “Resisting ‘Beauty’ and Real Women Have Curves.” In Velvet Barrios. Popular Culture and Chicano/a Sexualities, edited by Alicia Gaspar de Alba, 262–285. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.Google Scholar
  12. García, Ángel. From Prada to Nada. Santa Mónica, CA: Pantelion 2011.Google Scholar
  13. Lorey, Isabell. State of Insecurity. Government of the Precarious. London: Verso, 2015.Google Scholar
  14. MacLaird, Misha. Aesthetics and Politics in the Mexican Film Industry. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Martínez Reséndiz, Raúl. Un padre no tan padre. Santa Mónica, CA: Pantelion. 2016.Google Scholar
  16. Morales, Irene. “Instructions Not Included (2013).” Ethnic Representations in Film. May 17, 2016. http://citedatthecrossroads.net/dh330s16/2016/05/17/743/.
  17. O’Sullivan. “Instructions Not Included Movie Review.” The Washington Post. September 5, 2013. http://wapo.st/1aaFH7k?tid=ss_mail&utm_term=.546a127be2ee.
  18. “Popcorn People. Profiles of the U.S. Moviegoer Audience.” Nielsen Newswire. January 29, 2013. http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2013/popcorn-people-profiles-of-the-u-s-moviegoer-audience.html.
  19. Riggen, Patricia. Girl in Progress. Santa Mónica, CA: Pantelion, 2012.Google Scholar
  20. Sánchez Prado, Ignacio M. Screening Neoliberalism. Transforming Mexican Cinema 1988–2012. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
  21. Sassen, Saskia. Expulsions. Brutality and Complexity in the Global Economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
  22. Sennett, Richard. The Corrosion of Character. New York: Norton, 1998.Google Scholar
  23. Smith, Grady. “How Spanish-Language Comedy Instructions Not Included Became a Box Office Sensation.” Entertainment Weekly. September 4, 2013. http://ew.com/article/2013/09/04/instructions-not-included-box-office/.
  24. Villafañe, Verónica. “FCC Clears Mexico’s Televisa to Own 49% of Univision.” Forbes. January 4, 2017. http://www.forbes.com/sites/veronicavillafane/2017/01/04/fcc-clears-mexicos-televisa-to-own-49-of-univision/#1482a2592fed.
  25. Ybarra, Pitipol. Pulling Strings. México: Traziende Producciones, 2013.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ignacio M. Sánchez Prado
    • 1
  1. 1.Washington UniversitySt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations