Bolivian Indigenous Film and the Aesthetics of the Precarious

  • Gabriela Zamorano Villarreal
Part of the Global Cinema book series (GLOBALCINE)


The National Plan of Indigenous Communication in Bolivia, one of the most notable experiences of indigenous media in Latin America, is acknowledged by its nationwide presence since the late 1990s, its continuous collaboration with national indigenous and peasant unions, and its prolific production. The Plan Nacional is also known for its film production and distribution strategies which often destabilize conventional dynamics, for example, by addressing film directors as “responsables” and not as “filmmakers,” by stressing collaborative production with community and organization members, and by establishing alternative distribution circuits. Based on ethnographic and film analysis, this essay explores the concept of precarious as related to two aspects that characterize Plan Nacional’s work. The chapter discusses first how this initiative has embraced the need to produce low-budget films as a political aesthetic statement. And second, it analyzes how the Plan Nacional’s production dynamic embraces a moral principle of current Bolivian political culture that I explain as “political commitment,” understood as disinterested work seeking a collective benefit and political transformation. Although not always consistent with everyday organizing practices, this principle is common among indigenous unions, and has become instrumental for current state discourses. The chapter concludes that, in addition to concrete economic impacts on the Plan Nacional’s practices, the precarious similarly has affective and aesthetic implications, both in explicit forms of social struggle as well as in ordinary experiences—often reenacted in films—that significantly inform the sense and fantasies of present and future, and that may generate new, emerging forms of solidarity.

Works Cited

  1. Albó, Xavier. “From MNRistas to Kataristas to Katari.” In Resistance, Rebellion, and Consciousness in the Andean Peasant World, 19th to 20th Centuries, edited by Steve J. Stern, 379–419. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  2. Azcui, Mabel. “Evo Morales rebaja a la mitad el sueldo de los miembros del Gobierno boliviano.” El País. January 26, 2006. Accessed August 18, 2016.
  3. Berlant, Lauren. Cruel Optimism. Durham: Duke University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brett, Neilson, and Ned Rossiter. “Precarity as a Political Concept, or, Fordism as Exception.” Theory Culture and Society 25 (2008): 51–72. Accessed August 8, 2016. Scholar
  5. Buck-Morss, Susan. Dreamworld and Catastrophe: The Passing of Mass Utopia in East and West. Cambridge and London: The MIT Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  6. Claros, Humberto. Cocanchej Sutimpy. La Paz: CEFREC-CAIB, 2005.Google Scholar
  7. Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia. Constitución Política del Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia. La Paz: Ministerio de la Presidencia, 2009.Google Scholar
  8. García Espinosa, Julio. “For an Imperfect Cinema.” Translated by Julianne Burton. Jump Cut 20 (1979): 24–26. Accessed September 2, 2016.
  9. Getino, Octavio, and Fernando Solanas. “Hacia un tercer cine.” Tricontinental 13 (1969): 107–132.Google Scholar
  10. Hylton, Forrest, and Sinclair Thomson. Revolutionary Horizons. Past and Present in Bolivian Politics. London, New York: Verso, 2007.Google Scholar
  11. Hylton, Forrest, Félix Patzi, Sergio Serulnikov, and Sinclair Thomson. Ya es otro tiempo el presente. Cuatro momentos de insurgencia indígena. La Paz: Muela del Diablo Editores, 2005.Google Scholar
  12. Leipzig, Adam. “The Festival by the Numbers. Sundance Infographic 2014: Are Indies the ‘8th Studio’?” Cultural Weekly. January 22, 2014. Accessed September 1, 2016,
  13. Lerner, Jesse. “Dante Cerano’s Dia dos. Sex, Kinship and Videotape.” Minnesota Scholarship Online (2015). Accessed August 8, 2016. Scholar
  14. Luna, Patricio. Ángeles de la Tierra. La Paz: CEFREC-CAIB, 1997.Google Scholar
  15. Luna, Patricio. Qulqi Chaliku. La Paz: CEFREC-CAIB, 1998.Google Scholar
  16. Morales, María. Venciendo el Miedo. La Paz: CEFREC-CAIB, 2004.Google Scholar
  17. Noza, Alejandro, and Nicolás Ípamo. El Grito de la Selva. La Paz: CEFREC-CAIB, 2008.Google Scholar
  18. Pinto, Marcelino. Oro Maldito. La Paz: CEFREC-CAIB, 1999.Google Scholar
  19. Rivera-Cusicanqui, Silvia. Oprimidos Pero no Vencidos. Luchas del Campesinado Aymara y Qhechwa 1900–1980. La Paz, Bolivia: Ediciones Yachaywasi, 2003.Google Scholar
  20. Rocha, Glauber. “An esthetic of hunger.” In Brazilian Cinema, edited by Randal Johnson and Robert Stam, 68–71. New York: Columbia University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  21. Rouch, Jean. Cine-Ethnography. Minneapolis, London: Minnesota Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  22. Salazar, Juan Francisco. “Imperfect Media: The Poetics of Indigenous Media in Chile.” PhD diss., University of Western Sydney, 2004.Google Scholar
  23. Salazar, Juan Francisco, and Amalia Córdova. “Imperfect Media and the Poetics of Indigenous Video in Latin America.” In Global Indigenous Media. Cultures, Poetics, and Politics, edited by Pamela Wilson and Michelle Stewart, 39–57. Durham, London: Duke University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sanjinés, Jorge, and Grupo Ukamau. Teoría y Práctica de un Cine junto al Pueblo. México: Siglo XXI, 1979.Google Scholar
  25. Schavelzon, Salvador. El nacimiento del Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia. La Paz: Plural, 2012.Google Scholar
  26. Schiwy, Freya. Indianizing Film. Decolonization, the Andes, and the Question of Technology. New Brunswick, NJ, London: Rutgers University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  27. Shakow, Miriam. Along the Bolivian Highway: Social Mobility and Political Culture in a New Middle Class. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2014.Google Scholar
  28. Solás, Alberto. “Manifiesto del Cine Pobre.” 2003. Accessed August 8, 2016.
  29. Stewart, Kathleen. “Precarity’s Forms.” Cultural Anthropology 27 (2012): 518–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. United Nations Development Program. Human Development Report. Work for Human Development. New York: UNDP, 2015.Google Scholar
  31. Zamorano, Gabriela. Indigenous Media and Political Imaginaries in Contemporary Bolivia. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriela Zamorano Villarreal
    • 1
  1. 1.Centro de Estudios AntropológicosEl Colegio de MichoacánMichoacánMexico

Personalised recommendations