Advertisement

Cities, Nationalism and Conflict

  • Mirjana Ristic
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Cultural Heritage and Conflict book series (PSCHC)

Abstract

This chapter reviews the existing literature from the fields of architecture, urban design, geography, history, politics and sociology that addresses the spatial dimensions of political conflict. It does so by reflecting on the concepts and methodologies that have emerged within the current research, in particular, studies of urbicide, memoricide, warchitecture, difficult heritage, urban trauma and memory. The chapter argues that existing studies provide seminal tools for thinking about spatial dimensions of war: however, they are grounded in conceptions of place that have some limitations. It proposes an alternative methodology grounded in assemblage thinking as the conceptual framework and urban mapping as a research tool. It argues that these provide multi-disciplinary, multi-dimensional and multi-scalar methodology that enables understanding of the complexity of the spatial dynamics of war.

References

  1. Adorno, T. W. (2003). The Meaning of Working Through the Past. In R. Tiedemann (Ed.), Can One Live After Auschwitz?: A Philosophical Reader. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, J. C. (2004). Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Badescu, G. (2014). City Makers, Urban Reconstruction and Coming to Terms with the Past in Sarajevo. In B. Kotzen & S. Garcia (Eds.), Reconstructing Sarajevo: Negotiating Socio-political Complexity. London: LSE Cities.Google Scholar
  5. Bakarat, S. (2005). After the Conflict: Reconstruction and Development in the Aftermath of War. New York: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  6. Balfour, A. (1990). Berlin: The Politics of Order, 1737–1989. New York: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
  7. Barthes, R. (2001). Mythologies. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  8. Berman, M. (1996). Falling Towers: City Life After Urbicide. In D. Crow (Ed.), Geography and Identity: Living and Exploring Geopolitics of Identity. Washington, DC: Maisonneuve Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bevan, R. (2006). The Destruction of Memory: Architecture at War. London: Reaktion.Google Scholar
  10. Bogdanović, B. (1995). The City and Death. In J. Labon (Ed.), Balkan Blues: Writing Out of Yugoslavia. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bollens, S. (2011). City and Soul in Divided Societies. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Calame, J., & Charlesworth, E. (2009). Divided Cities: Belfast, Beirut, Jerusalem, Mostar, and Nicosia. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caruth, C. (1995). Trauma: Explorations in Memory. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Coward, M. (2007). Urbicide Reconsidered. Theory and Event, 10, 2.Google Scholar
  15. Coward, M. (2009). Urbicide: The Politics of Urban Destruction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Dovey, K. (1999). Framing Places: Mediating Power in Built Form. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dovey, K. (2008). Framing Places: Mediating Power in Built Form. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Dovey, K. (2016). Urban Design Thinking: A Conceptual Toolkit. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  19. Feldman, A. (1991). Formations of Violence: The Narrative of the Body and Political Terror in Northern Ireland. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and Nationalism. London: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  21. Graham, S. (2002). Bulldozers and Bombs: The Latest Palestinian-Israeli Conflict as Asymmetric Urbicide. Antipode, 34(4), 642–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Graham, S. (2003). Lessons in Urbicide. New Left Review, 19, 63–77.Google Scholar
  23. Grodach, C. (2002). ‘Reconstituting Identity and History in Post-war Mostar’, Bosnia-Herzegovina. City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action, 6(1), 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hanafi, S. (2009). Spacio-Cide: Colonial Politics, Invisibility and Rezoning in Palestinian Territory. Contemporary Arab Affairs, 2(1), 106–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Herscher, A. (2007). Urbicide, Urbanism, and Urban Destruction in Kosovo. Theory and Event, 10(2). http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/theory_and_event/toc/tae10.2.html
  26. Herscher, A. (2008). Warchitectural Theory. Journal of Architectural Education, 61(3), 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Herscher, A. (2010). Violence Taking Place: The Architecture of the Kosovo Conflict. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Herscher, A., & Siddiqi, A. (2014). Spatial Violence. Architectural Theory Review, 19(3), 269–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hobsbawm, E. J. (1992). The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Kaldor, M. (2007). New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. La Capra, D. (1994). Representing the Holocaust: History, Theory, Trauma. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Ladd, B. (1997). The Ghosts of Berlin: Confronting German History in the Urban Landscape. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lahoud, A., Rice, C., & Burke, A. (2010). Post-traumatic Urbanism. London: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lefebvre, H. (1996). Writings on Cities. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  35. Lein, Y., & Weizman, E. (2002). Land Grab. Jerusalem: B’Tselem.Google Scholar
  36. Logan, W., & Reeves, K. (2009). Places of Pain and Shame: Dealing with ‘Difficult’ Heritage. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  38. Macdonald, S. (2008). Difficult Heritage: Negotiating the Nazi Past in Nuremberg and Beyond. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Macdonald, S. (2015). Is ‘Difficult Heritage’ Still ‘Difficult’? Why Public Acknowledgment of Past Perpetration May No Longer Be So Unsettling to Collective Identities. Museum International, 67, 6–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mihai, M., & Thaler, M. (Eds.). (2014). Uses and Abuses of Political Apologies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  41. Misselwitz, P., & Rieniets, T. (2006). City of Collision: Jerusalem and the Principles of Conflict Urbanism. Basel: Birkhäuser.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nurhan, A. (2014). Urbicide in Palestine: Spaces of Oppression and Resilience. Oxon/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Pullan, W. (2011). Frontier Urbanism: The Periphery at the Centre of Contested Cities. The Journal of Architecture, 16(1), 15–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Riedlmayer, A. (1995, April 4). Killing Memory: The Targeting of Bosnia’s Cultural Heritage: Testimony Presented at a Hearing of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, U.S. Congress. www.haverford.edu/relg/sells/killing.html. Accessed 12 Sept 2011.
  45. Schneider, J., & Susser, I. (2003). Wounded Cities: Destruction and Reconstruction in a Globalized World. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  46. Segal, R., Weizman, E., & Tartakover, D. (2003). A Civilian Occupation: The Politics of Israeli Architecture. London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  47. Shaw, M. (2004). New Wars of the City: Relationships of “Urbicide” and “Genocide”. In S. Graham (Ed.), Cities, War and Terrorism: Towards an Urban Geopolitics (pp. 141–153). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Short, R. J., & Kim, Y.-H. (1998). Urban Crises/Urban Representations: Selling the City in Difficult Times. In T. Hall & P. Hubbard (Eds.), The Entrepreneurial City: Geographies of Politics, Regime, and Representation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  49. Silver, H. (2006). Introduction: Social Integration in the “New Berlin”. German Politics & Society, 24:4(81), 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Smesler, N. (2004). Psychological Trauma and Cultural Trauma. In J. C. Alexander (Ed.), Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  51. Smith, A. D. (1986). The Ethnic Origins of Nations. Oxford/New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  52. Smith, A. D. (1993). Ethnic Sources of Nationalism. In M. E. Brown (Ed.), Ethnic Conflict and International Security. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Stevens, Q. (2009). Nothing More That Feelings: Abstract Memorials. Architectural Theory Review, 14(2), 156–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Štraus, I. (1995) Arhitekt i barbari [Architect and Barbarians]. Sarajevo: Grad biblioteka, Medjunarodni Centar za Mir.Google Scholar
  55. Taylor, R. R. (1974). The Word in Stone: The Role of Architecture in the National Socialist Ideology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  56. Tunbridge, J. E., & Ashworth, G. J. (1994). Dissonant Heritage: The Management of the Past as a Resource in Conflict. Chichester: Willey.Google Scholar
  57. Vale, L. J. (2008). Architecture, Power, and National Identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Vale, L. J., & Campanella, T. J. (2004). The Resilient City: How Modern Cities Recover from Disaster. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Walkowitz, D. J., & Knauer, L. M. (2004). Memory and the Impact of Political Transformation in Public Space. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ware, S. (2004). Contemporary Anti-Memorials and National Identity in the Victorian Landscape. Journal of Australian Studies, 81, 121–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Weizman, E. (2007). Hollow Land: Israel’s Architecture of Occupation. London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  62. Woods, L. (1993). War and Architecture. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  63. Young, J. E. (1992). The Counter-Monument: Memory Against Itself in Germany Today. Critical Inquiry, 18(2), 267–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mirjana Ristic
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for SociologyTechnical University of DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations