Quality Methods for the Scientific Research

  • Antonella Lanati


This chapter is devoted to illustrating some methods and techniques for specific topics, starting from an overview of the project management discipline and related tools, to plan, execute, control, document and close a project. The failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is then illustrated to provide the reader with a method of risk assessment and error prevention for a process. The design of experiment (DoE), a statistical method for planning experimental activities, can give the researcher a means to optimally plan experiments, extract more information from data, strengthen the analysis of results and at the same time reduce the resources required. Two methods borrowed from industry, which are very promising but still at the beginning of their exploitation in scientific research, are then illustrated: lean management and six sigma. For each method, examples of application to scientific research are provided.


DoE Experimental design Risk assessment FMEA Lean management Six sigma 


  1. 1.
    A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). Project Management Institute (PMI). 2017.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ISO 21500:2012 guidance on project management.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    IEC 60812:2006. Analysis techniques for system reliability—procedure for failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    AIAG. Potential failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA). 2008.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    SAE J1739 potential failure mode and effects analysis in design (Design FMEA), Potential failure mode and effects analysis in manufacturing and assembly processes (Process FMEA). 2009.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lanati A, et al. A design of experiment approach to optimize an image analysis protocol for drug screening. In: Zazzu V, Ferraro MB, Guarracino MR, editors. Mathematical models in biology. Heidelberg: Springer; 2015. p. 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mancinelli S, et al. Applying design of experiments methodology to PEI toxicity assay on neural progenitor cells. In: Zazzu V, Ferraro MB, Guarracino MR, editors. Mathematical models in biology. Heidelberg: Springer; 2015. p. 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Antony J. Design of experiments for engineers and scientists. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science & Technology Books; 2003.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Montgomery D. Design and analysis of experiments. 8th ed. New York: Wiley; 2012.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang H. [Bio-Glossary]. Biological replicates vs technical replicates. 2012. Accessed 15 Sep 2017.
  11. 11.
    Anderson MJ, Whitcomb PJ. DOE simplified: practical tools for effective experimentation. 3rd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Washington State: lean in Washington. 2013. Accessed 15 Sep 2017.
  14. 14.
    Schweikhart SA, Dembe AE. The applicability of lean and six sigma techniques to clinical and translational research. J Investing Med. 2009;57(7):748–55. Scholar
  15. 15.
    Womack JP, Jones DT, Roos D. The machine that changed the world. New York: Free Press; 1990.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barnhart T. Creating a lean R&D system. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2013.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Amabile T. The progress principle: using small wins to ignite joy, engagement and creativity at work. Brighton: Harvard Business Review Press; 2011.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Siemens Healthcare: pursuing perfection through continuous improvement—an introduction to lean healthcare principles. 2015. Accessed 15 Sep 2017.
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
    iSixSIgma: six sigma costs and savings—the financial benefits of implementing six sigma at your company can be significant. 2008. Accessed 15 Sep 2017.
  21. 21.
    Carleysmith SW, Dufton AM, Altria KD. Implementing lean sigma in pharmaceutical research and development: a review by practitioners. R&D Manag. 2009;39(1):95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hollensead SC, Lockwood WB, Elin RJ. Errors in pathology and laboratory medicine: consequences and prevention. J Surg Oncol. 2004;88:161–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonella Lanati
    • 1
  1. 1.Valore QualitàPaviaItaly

Personalised recommendations