Examining the Relationship Between Commuting and it’s Impact on Overall Life Satisfaction

  • Lesley Fordham
  • Dea van Lierop
  • Ahmed El-Geneidy
Part of the Applying Quality of Life Research book series (BEPR)

Abstract

Commuting to work and school can be viewed as an unpleasant and necessary task. However, some people enjoy their commutes and be satisfied with it. Trip satisfaction can have a positive impact on overall life satisfaction of individual. The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between individuals’ satisfaction with their commuting trips and its impact on overall life satisfaction. This study is based on the results of the 2015/2016 McGill Commuter Survey, a university-wide travel survey in which students, staff and faculty described their commuting experiences to McGill University, located in Montreal, Canada. Using a Factor-Cluster analysis, the study reveals that there is a relationship between trip satisfaction and the impact of commuting on overall life satisfaction. One result of the study shows that cyclists and pedestrians who have the highest overall trip satisfaction, report that their life satisfaction is most impacted by their commute, and have the highest overall life satisfaction. Also, for all mode users, one or two clusters exhibit lower trip satisfaction, report that satisfaction with their commute does not greatly influence their life satisfaction, and claim having access to and using fewer modes relative to other users of the same mode. These results, in addition to the results that active mode users have high life and trip satisfaction, suggest that building well-connected multi-modal networks that incorporate active transportation can improve the travel experience of all commuters and impact their overall life satisfaction.

Keywords

Trip satisfaction Life satisfaction Cycling Walking Public transport Driving 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) for their financial support. We would also like to acknowledge Kathleen Ng and Brian Karasick from the McGill Office of Sustainability for their assistance with the various phases of this project, Prof. Kevin Manaugh and Charis Loong from McGill University for their help in designing the survey and Daniel Schwartz from IT Customer Services for his support in developing the online survey and managing the distribution of the survey to the McGill community.

References

  1. Banister, D., & Bowling, A. (2004). Quality of life for the elderly: The transport dimension. Transport Policy, 11(2), 105–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergstad, C., Gamble, A., Gärling, T., Hagman, O., Polk, M., Ettema, D., et al. (2011). Subjective well-being related to satisfaction with daily travel. Transportation, 38(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergstad, C., Gamble, A., Hagman, O., Polk, M., Gärling, T., Ettema, D., et al. (2012). Influences of affect associated with routine out-of-home activities on subjective well-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 7(1), 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhat, C., & Guo, J. (2007). A comprehensive analysis of built environment characteristics on household residential choice and auto ownership levels. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 41(5), 506–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cao, X. (2016). How does neighborhood design affect life satisfaction? Evidence from Twin Cities. Travel Behaviour and Society, 5, 68–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cao, J., & Zhang, J. (2016). Built environment, mobility, and quality of life. Travel Behaviour and Society, 5, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Choi, J., Coughlin, J., & D’Ambrosio, L. (2013). Travel time and subjective well-being. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2357, 100–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Choo, S., Collantes, G., & Mokhtarian, P. (2005). Wanting to travel, more or less: Exploring the determinants of the deficit and surfeit of personal travel. Transportation, 32(2), 135–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark, A., & Oswald, A. (1996). Satisfaction and comparison income. Journal of Public Economics, 61(3), 359–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Vos, J., & Witlox, F. (2017). Travel satisfaction revisited: On the pivotal role of travel satisfaction in conceptualising a travel behaviour process. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 106, 364–373.Google Scholar
  11. Delbosc, A. (2012). The role of well-being in transport policy. Transport Policy, 23, 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Delbosc, A., & Currie, G. (2011). Exploring the relative influences of transport disadvantage and social exclusion on well-being. Transport Policy, 18(4), 555–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40, 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diener, E., Emmons, R., Larsen, R., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diener, E., Suh, R., & Smith, H. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 403–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diener, E., Inglehart, R., & Tay, L. (2013). Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research, 112(3), 497–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Duarte, A., Garcia, C., Giannarakis, G., Limão, S., Polydoropoulou, A., & Litinas, N. (2010). New approaches in transportation planning: Happiness and transport economics. NETNOMICS: Economic Research and Electronic Networking, 11(1), 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ettema, D., & Schekkerman, M. (2016). How do spatial characteristics influence well-being and mental health? Comparing the effect of objective and subjective characteristics at different spatial scales. Travel Behaviour and Society, 5, 56–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ettema, D., & Verschuren, L. (2007). Multitasking and value of travel time savings. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2010, 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ettema, D., Gärling, T., Eriksson, L., Friman, M., Olsson, L., & Fujii, S. (2011). Satisfaction with travel and subjective well-being: Development and test of a measurement tool. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 14(3), 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ettema, D., Friman, M., Gärling, T., Olsson, L., & Fujii, S. (2012). How in-vehicle activities affect work commuters’ satisfaction with public transport. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 215–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Evans, G., Wener, R., & Phillips, D. (2002). The morning rush hour predictability and commuter stress. Environment and Behavior, 34(4), 521–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2005). Income and well-being: An empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5), 997–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gardner, B., & Abraham, C. (2007). What drives car use? A grounded theory analysis of commuters’ reasons for driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 10(3), 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gatersleben, B., & Uzzell, D. (2007). Affective appraisals of the daily commute comparing perceptions of drivers, cyclists, walkers, and users of public transport. Environment and Behavior, 39(3), 416–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gottholmseder, G., Nowotny, K., Pruckner, G., & Theurl, E. (2009). Stress perception and commuting. Health Economics, 18(5), 559–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Guo, W., Gupta, N., Pogrebna, G., & Jarvis, S. (2016). Understanding happiness in cities using Twitter: Jobs, children and transport. IEEE International Smart Cities Conference, Trento, Italy, 12–15 Sep 2016.Google Scholar
  30. Helliwell, J. (2003). How’s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. Economic Modelling, 20(2), 331–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Henao, A., Piatkowski, D., Luckey, K., Nordback, K., Marshall, W., & Krizek, K. (2015). Sustainable transportation infrastructure investments and mode share changes: A 20-year background of Boulder, Colorado. Transport Policy, 37, 64–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jain, J., & Lyons, G. (2008). The gift of travel time. Journal of Transport Geography, 16(2), 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Legrain, A., Eluru, N., & El-Geneidy, A. (2015). Am stressed, must travel: The relationship between mode choice and commuting stress. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 34, 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Loong, C., & El-Geneidy, A. (2016). It’s a matter of time: An assessment of additional time budgeted for commuting across modes. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Manaugh, K., & El-Geneidy, A. (2013). Does distance matter? Exploring the links among values, motivations, home location, and satisfaction in walking trips. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 50, 198–208.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mann, E., & Abraham, C. (2006). The role of affect in UK commuters’ travel mode choices: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 97(2), 155–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mao, Z., Ettema, D., & Dijst, M. (2016). Commuting trip satisfaction in Beijing: Exploring the influence of multimodal behavior and modal flexibility. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 94, 592–603.Google Scholar
  38. Mishra, S., Welch, T., & Jha, M. (2012). Performance indicators for public transit connectivity in multi-modal transportation networks. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(7), 1066–1085.Google Scholar
  39. Mokhtarian, P., & Salomon, I. (2001). How derived is the demand for travel? Some conceptual and measurement considerations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 35(8), 695–719.Google Scholar
  40. Mokhtarian, P., Papon, F., Goulard, M., & Diana, M. (2015). What makes travel pleasant and/or tiring? An investigation based on the French National Travel Survey. Transportation, 42(6), 1103–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Morris, E., & Guerra, E. (2015). Mood and mode: Does how we travel affect how we feel? Transportation, 42(1), 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Morris, E., & Hirsch, J. (2016). Does rush hour see a rush of emotions? Driver mood in conditions likely to exhibit congestion. Travel Behaviour and Society, 5, 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Myers, D. (2000). The funds, friends, and faith of happy people. American Psychologist, 55(1), 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Novaco, R., Stokols, D., & Milanesi, L. (1990). Objective and subjective dimensions of travel impedance as determinants of commuting stress. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18(2), 231–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Novaco, R., Kliewer, W., & Broquet, A. (1991). Home environmental consequences of commute travel impedance. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19(6), 881–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Olsson, L., Gärling, T., Ettema, D., Friman, M., & Fujii, S. (2013). Happiness and satisfaction with work commute. Social Indicators Research, 111(1), 255–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ory, D., & Mokhtarian, P. (2005). When is getting there half the fun? Modeling the liking for travel. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(2), 97–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ory, D., & Mokhtarian, P. (2009). Modeling the structural relationships among short-distance travel amounts, perceptions, affections, and desires. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 43(1), 26–43.Google Scholar
  49. Ory, D. T., Mokhtarian, P. L., Redmond, L. S., Salomon, I., Collantes, G. O., & Choo, S. (2004). When is commuting desirable to the individual? Growth and Change, 35(3), 334–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Redmond, L., & Mokhtarian, P. (2001). The positive utility of the commute: Modeling ideal commute time and relative desired commute amount. Transportation, 28(2), 179–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schimmack, U. (2008). The structure of subjective well-being. In The science of subjective well-being (pp. 97–123). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  52. Stanley, J., & Stanley, J. (2007). Public transport and social policy goals. Road & Transport Research: A Journal of Australian and New Zealand Research and Practice, 16(1), 20.Google Scholar
  53. Stanley, J., Hensher, D., Stanley, J., & Vella-Brodrick, D. (2011). Mobility, social exclusion and well-being: Exploring the links. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45(8), 789–801.Google Scholar
  54. St-Louis, E., Manaugh, K., van Lierop, D., & El-Geneidy, A. (2014). The happy commuter: A comparison of commuter satisfaction across modes. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 26, 160–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stokols, D., Novaco, R., Stokols, J., & Campbell, J. (1978). Traffic congestion, type A behavior, and stress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(4), 467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stradling, S., Anable, J., & Carreno, M. (2007). Performance, importance and user disgruntlement: A six-step method for measuring satisfaction with travel modes. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 41(1), 98–106.Google Scholar
  57. Stutzer, A., & Frey, B. (2008). Stress that doesn’t pay: The commuting paradox. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 110(2), 339–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Terveen, L. (2013). Bike, bus, and beyond: Extending cyclopath to enable multi-modal routing. Minnesota Department of Transprtation: Twin Cities, Minnesota.Google Scholar
  59. van den Berg, P., Kemperman, A., de Kleijn, B., & Borgers, A. (2016). Ageing and loneliness: The role of mobility and the built environment. Travel Behaviour and Society, 5, 48–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wener, R., Evans, G., & Boately, P. (2005). Commuting stress: Psychophysiological effects of a trip and spillover into the workplace. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1924, 112–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Willis, D., Manaugh, K., & El-Geneidy, A. (2013). Uniquely satisfied: Exploring cyclist satisfaction. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 18, 136–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Xiong, Y., & Zhang, J. (2016). Effects of land use and transport on young adults’ quality of life. Travel Behaviour and Society, 5, 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lesley Fordham
    • 1
  • Dea van Lierop
    • 1
  • Ahmed El-Geneidy
    • 1
  1. 1.McGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations