Advertisement

Model of Announcing a Diagnosis of Cancer: The French Experience

  • Carine Musete
  • Françoise Charnay-Sonnek
Chapter
Part of the Principles of Specialty Nursing book series (PSN)

Abstract

Announcing a diagnosis of cancer is for a patient like a big stone falling on his head. This disease especially in the past was synonymous with death, devastating side effects, pain, damaged body image, etc. we are less tempted to make such comparison today because today we are likely to live with a cancer disease for years, thank the progress in the medicine and new technologies. Indeed we consider this disease as a chronic disease, and we can live with cancer for a very long time with the exception of certain types of cancer.

Going back decades before, considering the image of cancer and the burden it causes, it made sense that competent authorities couldn’t remain indifferent to this situation. All around the world, health organizations led large actions to better face cancer disease and to enhance caring patients with cancer. In Europe, France was one of the first to have established a cancer plan.

Keywords

Cancer plan Announcing a diagnosis Supportive care Holistic approach Multidisciplinary After cancer 

References

  1. 1.
    Celebrating 10 Years of the National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program, 1998 to 2008, Anne major, Sherri L. Stewart, PhD, Preventing Chronic Disease Public health Research, Pratice and Policy; 6(4) October 2009.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    European Guide for Quality National Cancer Control Programs Tit Albreht, Jose M. Martin-Moreno, Marjetka Jelenc, Lydia Gorgojo, Meggan Harris. European Partnership Against Cancer (EPAC), National Institute of Public Health, European Commission.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    EPAAC Final Preliminary Report prepared by Lydia Gorgojo, MD, PhD; Meggan Harris, BA; Eva Garcia-Lopez, MS, MPH and the Core Working Group coordinated by the National Institute of Public Health of the Republic of Slovenia (12 December 2011 and amended until 22 April 2012).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dauchy S, Ellien F, Lesieur A, Bezy O, Boinon D, Chabrier M, Charles C, Dolbeault S, Joly F, Heuguerot A, Lemaitre L, Machavoine J-L, Marx E, Marx G, Piollet-Calmette I. Quelle prise en charge psychologique dans l’après-cancer ? Les recommandations de la Société Française de Psycho-Oncologie (SFPO). Psycho-Oncologie. 2013;7(1):4–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    What psychological care should there be after cancer? Guidelines from the French Psycho-Oncology Society (SFPO) S. Dauchy (Villejuif) F. Ellien (Champcueil) A. Lesieur (Paris) O. Bezy (Clermont-Ferrand) D. Boinon (Villejuif) M. Chabrier (Clermont-Ferrand) C. Charles (Villejuif) S. Dolbeault (Paris) F. Joly (Caen) A. Heuguerot (Paris) L. Lemaitre (Montpellier) J.-L. Machavoine (Caen) E. Marx (Strasbourg) G. Marx (Saint-Cloud) I. Piollet-Calmette (Avignon) S. Pucheu (Paris) M. Reich (Lille) E. Seigneur (Paris) Psycho-Oncol. 2013;7:4–17.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11839-013-0409-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carine Musete
    • 1
  • Françoise Charnay-Sonnek
    • 2
  1. 1.Auto-entrepreneur Consultante en formationPontault-CombaultFrance
  2. 2.UnicancerParisFrance

Personalised recommendations