Advertisement

Integrated Care Pathways After Stroke

  • D. M. de Vries-Giesen
  • B. I. Buijck
  • M. Janečková
Chapter

Abstract

Time wise, the most common distinction of stroke is division to (1) acute phase, (2) rehabilitation phase, and (3) chronic/long-term care phase. There are not always clear-cut boundaries, but generally the nature and treatment goals of these phases differ substantially. The different phases of care provision, delivered by various independent providers and in different locations can make the patients’ pathway rather fragmented. Integrated care can be a solution to this fragmentation by trying to achieve better connectivity, alignment and inter-sectoral cooperation. It is used synonymously to terms like coordinated or seamless care. Care organized in coordinated or integrated networks is a relatively new organizational form. It is not a ‘classical’ form of an organization, with a hierarchical (vertical) structure and clear decision powers. Networks are rather a joint venture, in which work is based on common goals, building relationships and trust, horizontal structure and particular provider transcending purpose. There is no hierarchical relationship in a network and no ‘power’ to get things done; for this it requires substantive motivation of all parties involved. Currently several approaches to measure the maturity or development of integrated care exist. For example, Minkmans’ Development Model for Integrated Care takes a clinical or organisational perspective and focuses on nine elements (clusters) that are important for successful development of integrated care. By better care coordination or integrating providers into a network of systematically cooperating organisations, care can be improved (Mur 2003; Goodwin 2014). In this chapter we also provide examples of integrated care systems.

Keywords

Stroke Integrated care Stroke phases Organization Coordination 

References

  1. Clark JD. The role of multidisciplinary team care in stroke rehabilitation. Prog Neurol Psychiatry. 2013;17:5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Goodwin N, Dixon A, Anderson G, Wodchis W. Providing integrated care for older people with complex needs: lessons from seven international case studies. London: The King’s Fund; 2014.Google Scholar
  3. http://www.kennisnetwerkcva.nl. Consulted on November 25, 2017.Google Scholar
  4. http://www.rotterdamstrokeservice.nl. Consulted on November 25, 2017.Google Scholar
  5. http://www.scirocco-project.eu/maturitymodel. Consulted on November 25, 2017.Google Scholar
  6. Kodner DL. All together now: a conceptual exploration of integrated care. Healthc Q. 2009;13(Special Issue):6–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Minkman MMN, Schouten L, van Splunteren P, Huijsman R. Integrated care for patients with a stroke in the Netherlands: results and experiences from a national breakthrough collaborative improvement project. Int J Integr Care. 2005;5(1–12):e14.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Minkman MMN, Vermeulen RP, Ahaus KTB, Huijsman R. A survey study to validate a four phases development model for integrated care in the Netherlands. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:214.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Mur-Veeman I, Hardy B, Steenbergen M, Wistow G. Development of integrated care in England and the Netherlands: managing across public-private boundaries. Health Policy. 2003;65(3):227–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Tummers JFM, Schrijvers AJ, Visser-Meily JM. Economic evidence on integrated care for stroke patients; a systematic review. Int J Integr Care. 2012;12:e193.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. van Dijk D, Wapstra T. A good collaboration: working together for success. Amersfoort: Thieme Meulenhoff; 2005. In Dutch.Google Scholar
  12. Vat L, Middelkoop I, Buijck B, Minkman MMN. The development of integrated stoke care in the Netherlands: a benchmark study. Int J Integr Care. 2016;16(4):12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. M. de Vries-Giesen
    • 1
  • B. I. Buijck
    • 2
  • M. Janečková
    • 3
  1. 1.EnschedeThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Department of Neurology & Rotterdam Stroke ServiceRotterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Faculty of Social SciencesCharles University in PraguePragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations