Ontology Visualization: An Overview

  • Nassira Achich
  • Bassem Bouaziz
  • Alsayed Algergawy
  • Faiez Gargouri
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 736)

Abstract

As the main way for knowledge representation for the purpose of completely machine understanding, ontologies are widely used in different application domains. This full machine understanding makes them harder to be easily understood by a human. This necessitates the need to develop ontology visualization tools, which results in the existence of a large number of approaches and visualization tools. Along with this development direction, the number of published research papers related to ontology visualization is largely increasing. To this end, in this paper, we introduce a systemic review on different directions related to ontology visualization. In particular, we start by describing different application domains that make use of ontology visualization. Then, we propose a generic visualization pipeline that incorporates main steps in ontology visualization that could be later used as main criteria during comparing and discussing different visualization tools. By this review, we aim to introduce a general visualization pipeline that is useful when comparing ontology visualization tools and when developing a new visualization technique. Finally, the paper moves into the description of future trends and research issues that still need to be addressed.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the DAAD funding through the BioDialog project.

References

  1. 1.
    Antoniou, G., Franconi, E., van Harmelen, F.: Introduction to semantic web ontology languages. In: First International Summer School on Reasoning Web, Tutorial Lectures, pp. 1–21 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aurisano, J., Nanavaty, A., Cruz, I.F.: Visual analytics for ontology matching using multi-linked views. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Visualizations and User Interfaces for Ontologies and Linked Data Co-located with 14th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2015), p. 25 (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blinkiewicz, M., Bąk, J.: SQuaRE: a visual approach for ontology-based data access. In: LNCS (including subseries LNAI and LNBI), vol. 10055, pp. 47–55. Springer, Cham (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bosca, A., Bonino, D.: OntoSphere3D: a multidimensional visualization tool for ontologies. In: 17th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA 2006), pp. 339–343 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burch, M., Lohmann, S.: Visualizing the evolution of ontologies: a dynamic graph perspective. In: International Workshop on Visualizations and User Interfaces for Ontologies and Linked Data Co-located with ISWC 2015, p. 69 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Calvanese, D., Cogrel, B., Komla-Ebri, S., Kontchakov, R., Lanti, D., Rezk, M., Rodriguez-Muro, M., Xiao, G.: Ontop: answering SPARQL queries over relational databases. Semant. Web 8(3), 471–487 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carbon, S., Ireland, A., Mungall, C.J., Shu, S., Marshall, B., Lewis, S.: AmiGO: online access to ontology and annotation data. Bioinformatics 25(2), 288–289 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Catenazzi, N., Sommaruga, L.: Generic environments for knowledge management and visualization. J. Ambient Intell. Hum. Comput. 4(1), 99–108 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Catenazzi, N., Sommaruga, L., Mazza, R.: User-friendly ontology editing and visualization tools: the OWLeasyViz approach. In: 13th International Conference Information Visualisation, pp. 283–288 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Christen, V., Hartung, M., Groß, A.: Region evolution explorer - a tool for discovering evolution trends in ontology regions. J. Biomed. Semant. 6, 26 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dragisic, Z., Ivanova, V., Lambrix, P., Faria, D., Jiménez-Ruiz, E., Pesquita, C.: User validation in ontology alignment. In: 15th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2016), pp. 200–217 (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Du, Z., Zhou, X., Ling, Y., Zhang, Z., Su, Z.: agriGO: a GO analysis toolkit for the agricultural community. Nucleic Acids Res. 38(suppl 2), W64–W70 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Falconer, S.M., Callendar, C., Storey, M.-A.: FLEXVIZ: visualizing biomedical ontologies on the web. In: International Conference on Biomedical Ontology, Software Demonstration, Buffalo, p. 1 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Faria, D., Martins, C., Nanavaty, A., Taheri, A., Pesquita, C., Santos, E., Cruz, I.F., Couto, F.M.: Agreementmakerlight results for OAEI 2014. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Ontology Matching Collocated with the 13th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2014), Riva del Garda, pp. 105–112, 20 October 2014Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Farquhar, A., Fikes, R., Rice, J.: The Ontolingua server a tool for collaborative ontology construction. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 46(6), 707–727 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Furnas, G.W.: Generalized fisheye views. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 16–23, April 1986Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ghorbel, F., Ellouze, N., Métais, E., Hamdi, F., Gargouri, F., Herradi, N.: MEMO GRAPH: an ontology visualization tool for everyone. In: 20th International Conference on Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information & Engineering Systems (KES-2016), pp. 265–274 (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Giese, M., Soylu, A., Vega-Gorgojo, G., Waaler, A., Haase, P., Jiménez-Ruiz, E., Lanti, D., Rezk, M., Xiao, G., Özçep, Ö.L., Rosati, R.: Optique: zooming in on big data. IEEE Comput. 48(3), 60–67 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grover, P., Chawla, S.: Ontology creation and development model. 6(1991), 3878–3883 (2014). ijircce.com
  20. 20.
    Guarino, N., Oberle, D., Staab, S.: What is an ontology? In: Handbook on Ontologies, pp. 1–17 (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gutierrez-Pulido, J.R., Ruiz, M.A.G., Herrera, R., Cabello, E., Legrand, S., Elliman, D.: Ontology languages for the semantic web: a never completely updated review. Knowl. Based Syst. 19(7), 489–497 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hartung, M., Groß, A., Rahm, E.: CODEX: exploration of semantic changes between ontology versions. Bioinformatics 28(6), 895–896 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Heer, J., Card, S.K., Landay, J.A.: prefuse: a toolkit for interactive information visualization. In: Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2005), pp. 421–430 (2005)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Katifori, A., Halatsis, C., Lepouras, G., Vassilakis, C., Giannopoulou, E.G.: Ontology visualization methods - a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 39(4), 10 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kharlamov, E., Hovland, D., Jiménez-Ruiz, E., Lanti, D., Lie, H., Pinkel, C., Rezk, M., Skjæveland, M.G., Thorstensen, E., Xiao, G., Zheleznyakov, D., Horrocks, I.: Ontology based access to exploration data at statoil. In: 14th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2015), pp. 93–112 (2015)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Klein, M., Fensel, D., Kiryakov, A., Ognyanov, D.: Ontology versioning and change detection on the web. In: Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management: Ontologies and the Semantic Web, pp. 197–212 (2002)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lambrix, P., Dragisic, Z., Ivanova, V., Anslow, C.: Visualization for ontology evolution. In: Second International Workshop on Visualization and Interaction for Ontologies and Linked Data co-located with the 15th International Semantic Web Conference, VOILA@ISWC 2016, pp. 54–67 (2016)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Li, Y., Stroe, C., Cruz, I.F.: Interactive visualization of large ontology matching results. In: International Workshop on Visualizations and User Interfaces for Ontologies and Linked Data Co-located with ISWC 2015, p. 37 (2015)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Liepins, R., Grasmanis, M., Bojars, U.: Owlgred ontology visualizer. In: Proceedings of the ISWC Developers Workshop 2014, pp. 37–42 (2014)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Livingston, K.M., Bada, M., Baumgartner Jr., W.A., Hunter, L.E.: KaBOB: ontology-based semantic integration of biomedical databases. BMC Bioinform. 16, 126:1–126:21 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lohmann, S., Negru, S., Haag, F., Ertl, T.: Visualizing ontologies with VOWL. Semant. Web 7(4), 399–419 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Malik, S.K., Rizvi, S.: Ontology design towards web intelligence: a sports complex ontology case study. In: Fourth International Conference on Computational Aspects of Social Networks (CASoN), pp. 366–371 (2012)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Negru, S., Lohmann, S.: A visual notation for the integrated representation of OWL ontologies. In: 9th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies (WEBIST 2013), pp. 308–315 (2013)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Noy, N.F., Klein, M.C.A.: Ontology evolution: not the same as schema evolution. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 6(4), 428–440 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shvaiko, P., Euzenat, J.: Ontology matching: state of the art and future challenges. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 25(1), 158–176 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Soylu, A., Giese, M., Jiménez-Ruiz, E., Kharlamov, E., Zheleznyakov, D., Horrocks, I.: Ontology-based end-user visual query formulation: why, what, who, how, and which? Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 16(2), 435–467 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Steinfeld, I., Navon, R., Creech, M.L., Yakhini, Z., Tsalenko, A.: ENViz: a cytoscape app for integrated statistical analysis and visualization of sample-matched data with multiple data types. Bioinformatics 31(10), 1683–1685 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stojanovic, L.: Methods and tools for ontology evolution. Ph.D. thesis, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany (2004)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Vercruysse, S., Venkatesan, A., Kuiper, M.: OLSVis: an animated, interactive visual browser for bio-ontologies. BMC Bioinform. 13(1), 116 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zviedris, M., Barzdins, G.: Viziquer: a tool to explore and query SPARQL endpoints. In: 8th Extended Semantic Web Conference (ESWC), pp. 441–445 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nassira Achich
    • 1
  • Bassem Bouaziz
    • 1
  • Alsayed Algergawy
    • 2
  • Faiez Gargouri
    • 1
  1. 1.Higher Institute of computer science and MultimediaUniversity of SfaxSfaxTunisia
  2. 2.Friedrich-Schiller-Universität JenaJenaGermany

Personalised recommendations