Advertisement

In the Golden Cage of Creative Industries: Public-Private Valuing of Female Creative Labour

  • Valerija Barada
  • Jaka Primorac
Chapter
Part of the Dynamics of Virtual Work book series (DVW)

Abstract

Barada and Primorac offer a much-needed discussion on the social valuing of female creative labour. By drawing on empirical data on the cultural and creative sectors in Croatia, they show how the dictum that creative labour will be emancipatory for both women and men proved to be a techno-optimistic fallacy, since it encourages non-paid, underpaid, and self-exploitative practices, putting women in more precarious positions than men. Female creatives are facing the implosion of the public into the private sphere, while the social value of their work is decreasing. Technologies of creative labour contribute to contradictory practices that result in covert redomestication of female creatives. Faced with the feminization of their everyday life, female creatives find themselves trapped between a highly demanding profession and traditional gender roles. Labouring in the creative industries proves to be a golden cage for women.

References

  1. Abercrombie, N., Hill, S., & Turner, B. S. (2000). The Penguin dictionary of sociology. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  2. Barada, V. (2012). Žensko iskustvo rada u kreativnim industrijama – primjer dizajnerica vizualnih komunikacija u Hrvatskoj. Zagreb: Filozofski fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu. Doktorska disertacija. [Women’s experience of labour in creative industries – Example of female visual communication designers in Croatia. Doctoral thesis].Google Scholar
  3. Barada, V., & Primorac, J. (2014). Non-paid, under-paid and self-exploiting labour as a choice and a necessity: Example of women in creative industries. In M. Adamović et al. (Eds.), Young women in post-Yugoslav societies: Research, practice and policy (pp. 143–163). Zagreb/Sarajevo: Institute for Social Research in Zagreb/Human Rights Centre, University of Sarajevo.Google Scholar
  4. Barada, V., Primorac, J., & Buršić, E. (2016). Osvajanje prostora rada. Uvjeti rada organizacija civilnog društva na području suvremene kulture i umjetnosti [Defining the area of work. Labour conditions in civil society organizations in contemporary culture and art]. Zagreb: Zaklada ‘Kultura nova’.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, U. (2000). The brave new world of work. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bell, D. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society. A venture in social forecasting. Harmondsworth/New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  7. Castells, M. (2000). Uspon umreženog društva [The rise of the network society]. Zagreb: Golden Marketing.Google Scholar
  8. Conor, B., Gill, R., & Taylor, S. (2015). Gender and creative labour. The Sociological Review, 63(S1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Creative Industries Fact File. (2002). Department for culture, media and sport creative industries division. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.culture.gov.uk/PDF/ci_fact_file.pdf. Accessed 15 Apr 2017.
  10. Crompton, R. (1987). Gender, status and professionalism. Sociology, 21(3), 413–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dormer, P. (2003). Design since 1945. London: Thames & Hudson Ltd.Google Scholar
  12. Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  13. Florida, R. (2005). The flight of the creative class. New York: HarperBusiness.Google Scholar
  14. Folbre, N. (2012). For love and money. Care provision in the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  15. Grujić, H., Šimunić, A., & Gregov, L. (2014). Konflikt radne i obiteljske uloge kod zaposlenih bračnih drugova: važnost usklađenosti stava prema bračnim ulogama [Work–family conflict among employed spouses: The importance of the compliance of attitudes towards marital roles]. Društvena istraživanja, 23(4), 641–659.Google Scholar
  16. Hesmondhalgh, D. (2002). The cultural industries. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  17. Hesmondhalgh, D., & Baker, S. (2011). Creative labor. Media work in three cultural industries. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Hochschild, A. R. (1989). The second shift. Working parents and the revolution at home. New York: Viking Penguin Inc.Google Scholar
  19. Hochschild, A. R. (1997). The time bind. When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
  20. Kalleberg, A. L. (2007). The mismatched worker (Contemporary societies, 1st). New York/London: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  21. Kršić, D. (2009). Designed in Croatia. Didaktička izložba. V.10. (deplijan izložbe, Zagreb, 07.05.2009.–22.05.2009.) [Exhibition catalogue].Google Scholar
  22. Lebert, D., & Vercellone, C. (2007). Uloga znanja u dinamici dugog razdoblja kapitalizma: hipoteza o kognitivnom kapitalizmu. In C. Vercellone (Ed.), Kognitivni kapitalizam. Znanje i financije u postfordističkom razdoblju [Cognitive capitalism – Knowledge and finance in the post-Fordist period]. Zagreb: Politička kultura..Google Scholar
  23. Millen, D. (1997). Some methodological and epistemological issues raised by doing feminist research on non-feminist women. Sociological Research Online, 2(3). Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/3/3.html CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Olesen, V. L. (2003). Feminisms and qualitative research at and into the millennium. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research. Theories and issues (2nd ed., pp. 332–397). Thousand Oaks/London/New Delhi: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Petrić, M. (2006). Konteksti. In M. Mrduljaš (Ed.), Pregled hrvatskog dizajna 040506 [A review of Croatian design 040506] (pp. 8–10). Zagreb: Hrvatsko dizajnersko društvo.Google Scholar
  26. Primorac, J. (2016). Towards more insecurity? Virtual work and the sustainability of creative labour. In J. Webster & K. Randle (Eds.), Virtual workers and the global labour market. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Randle, K. (2015). Class and exclusion at work: The case of UK film and television. In K. Oakley & J. O’Connor (Eds.), The Routledge companion to the cultural industries (pp. 330–343). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Rašić Bakarić, I., Bačić, K., & Božić, L. (2015). Mapiranje kreativnih i kulturnih industrija u Republici Hrvatskoj [Mapping of creative and cultural industries in Croatia]. Zagreb: Ekonomski institut.Google Scholar
  29. Rifkin, J. (1995). The end of work. The decline of the global labor force and the dawn of the post-market era. New York: Tarcher/Putnam.Google Scholar
  30. Ross, A. (2003). No-collar. The humane workplace and its hidden costs. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Ross, A. (2008). The new geography of work: Power to the precarious? Theory, Culture and Society, 25(7–8), 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Simmel, G. (2001 [1911]). Ženska kultura [Feminine culture]. In Kontrapunkti kulture [Counterpoints of culture]. Zagreb: Naklada Jesenski i Turk.Google Scholar
  33. Simmel, G., & Oakes, G. (1984). Georg Simmel, on women, sexuality, and love. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Smith, D. E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Smith, D. E. (2002a). Institutional ethnography. In T. May (Ed.), Qualitative research in action (pp. 17–52). London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  36. Smith, D. E. (2002b [1990]). The conceptual practices of power. In C. Calhoun et al. (Eds.), Contemporary sociological theory (pp. 315–322). Malden/Oxford/Melbourne/Berlin: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  37. Tomić-Koludrović, I. (2015). Pomak prema modernosti. Žene u Hrvatskoj u razdoblju ‘zrele’ tranzicije [Moving towards modernity: Women in Croatia in the period of ‘mature’ transition]. Zagreb: Naklada Jesenski i Turk; Hrvatsko sociološko društvo.Google Scholar
  38. Tomić-Koludrović, I., & Lončarić, D. (2007). Promjene rodnih uloga u procesima modernizacije: usporedba Austrije i Hrvatske [Changes of gender roles in processes of modernization: Comparison of Austria and Croatia]. Acta Iadertina, 3(3), 55–71.Google Scholar
  39. Tomić-Koludrović, I., & Petrić, M. (2007). Hrvatsko društvo – prije i tijekom tranzicije [Croatian society – before and during transition]. Društvena istraživanja, 16(4–5), 867–889.Google Scholar
  40. Touraine, A. (1980 [1969]). Postindustrijsko društvo [Postindustrial societies]. Zagreb: Globus.Google Scholar
  41. Walby, S. (1990). Theorizing patriarchy. Oxford/Cambridge: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  42. Walby, S. (2005 [1997]). Rodne preobrazbe [Gender transformations]. Zagreb: Ženska infoteka.Google Scholar
  43. Weeks, K. (2004 [1998]). Labor, standpoints, and feminist subjects. In S. Harding (Ed.), The feminist standpoint theory reader. Intellectual and political controversies (pp. 181–193). New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Witz, A. (1992). Professions and patriarchy. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valerija Barada
    • 1
  • Jaka Primorac
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of ZadarZadarCroatia
  2. 2.Department for Culture and CommunicationInstitute for Development and International RelationsZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations