Austerity Measures and Local Public Services in Cyprus: Coping with Challenges Old and New and Reinforcing Historical Continuities

  • Andreas Kirlappos
  • Philippos Philippou
  • Kalliope Agapiou-Josephides
Part of the Governance and Public Management book series (GPM)


Austerity measures have substantially redrawn a number of boundaries, challenges and perceptions in Cyprus’ political, economic and administrative history. Empirically, austerity measures seem to outreach their immediately apparent scope of fiscal consolidation with repercussions for the economy as a whole as well as for wider public management and citizens’ well-being. This has created new dynamics and posed new challenges to local public services, which constitutes a theoretically and empirically challenging endeavour within the framework of Europeanization research. This chapter contextualizes and analyses the variety of austerity measures and their impact on Cyprus’ local public services from a two-fold perspective. In the first place, it does so through a mapping of austerity measures, their specificities and impact. Secondly, it examines how divergent brands of policies and reforms could potentially be transferred via unofficial channels, such as the Learning and Development function of a public administration system. Finally, this work argues that the design and delivery of local public services depends on historical continuities that affect the interplay between central and local government structures and that austerity measures cannot but reinforce them.


Austerity measures Republic of Cyprus Local government Local public services Historical continuities Europeanization Learning and Development (L & D) 


  1. Auditor General of the Republic. (2000–2016). Annual Reports 2000–2016. Nicosia: Audit Office of the Republic of Cyprus.Google Scholar
  2. Bosco, A., & Verney, S. (2012). Electoral Epidemic: The Political Cost of Economic Crisis in Southern Europe. South European Society &Politics, 17(2), 129–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bull, M., & Baudner, J. (2004). Europeanization and Italian Policy for the Mezzogiorno. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(6), 1058–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Callanan, M. (2012). Domestic Governance Arrangements and Europeanization: The Case of Central-Local Relations in England, Ireland and Denmark. Comparative European Politics, 10(4), 399–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dalitis, F. (2015). Reform of the Municipalities with Italian Masters: The Union of Municipalities ‘Package for Clustering Gains Ground’. Philelepheros Online. Available at Accessed 22 Feb 2017 (in Greek).
  6. Dellepiane, S. (2015). The Political Power of Economic Ideas: The Case of Expansionary Fiscal Contractions. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 17(3), 391–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Di Mascio, F., & Natalini, A. (2015). Fiscal Retrenchment in Southern Europe: Changing Patterns of Public Management in Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain. Public Management Review, 17(1), 129–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who Learns What from Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature. Political Studies, 44(2), 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making. Governance, 13(1), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. European Commission. (2014, December). The Economic Adjustment Programme: Cyprus 5th Review-Summer 2014, European Economy: Institutional Paper 009 (120p). Luxemburg: Publication Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  11. European Commission, (2015, October). The Economic Adjustment Programme: Cyprus 7th Review-Summer 2015, European Economy: Institutional Paper 009 (124p). Luxemburg: Publication Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  12. Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Systems Law. (N.20(1)/2014). Nicosia: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  13. Fleurke, F., & Willemse, R. (2007). Effects of the European Union on Sub-National Decision-Making: Enhancement or Constriction? Journal of European Integration, 29(1), 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gilson, C., Dunleavy, P., & Tinkler, J. (2009). Organizational Learning in Government Sector Organizations: Literature Review Source: National Audit Office (NAO). Available at: on 9.3.2013. Accessed 17 Apr 2017.
  15. International Monetary Fund, Country Report 14/180-Cyprus. (2014, July). IMF: Washington, DC. Available at: Accessed 16 Feb 2017.
  16. Kavkalias, G. (2016). Reforming Local Government: The Hidden Traps. Sigmalive. Available at Accessed 4 Sept 2016 (in Greek).
  17. Kirlappos, A. (2016). Local Government in the Republic of Cyprus: The Limited Europeanization and the Burdens of the Past (238 p). Larnaca: Vivliekdotiki (in Greek).Google Scholar
  18. Ladi, S. (2013). The Eurozone Crisis and Austerity Politics: A Trigger for Administrative Reform in Greece? Comparative European Politics, 22(2), 184–208.Google Scholar
  19. Ladner, A. (2017). Autonomy and Austerity: Re-investing in Local Government. In C. Schwab, G. Bouckaert, & S. Kuhlmann (Eds.), The Future of Local Government in Europe Lessons from Research and Practice in 31 Countries (pp. 23–52). Berlin: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Law on the Prohibition of Filling Vacant Positions in the Public and the Wider Public Sector. (N.21(1)/2013). Nicosia: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  21. Maor, M. (1999). Recruitment and Training of Senior Civil Servants in Denmark and Norway, 1970–1995: The Impact of New public management and European integration. Current Politics and Economics of Europe, 8(4), 321–339.Google Scholar
  22. Markides, D. (2009). Cyprus: 1957–1963 (238 p). Athens: Mesogeios. (in Greek).Google Scholar
  23. Mayer, N. (2013). From Jean-Marie to Marine Le Pen-Electoral Change on the Far Right. Parliamentary Affairs, 66(1), 160–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Memorandum of Understanding on Specific Economic Policy Conditionality. (2013). Available at: Accessed 14 Mar 2017.
  25. Meyer-Sahling, J.-H., & Yesilkagit, K. (2011). Differential Legacy Effects: Three Propositions on the Impact of Administrative Traditions on Public Management Reform in Europe East and West. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(2), 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ministry of the Interior-Central Electoral Service. (2011–2016). Nicosia. Available at: Accessed 14 Mar 2017.
  27. Morlino, L., & Quaranta, M. (2016). What Is the Impact of the Economic Crisis on Democracy? Evidence from Europe. International Political Science Review, 37(5), 618–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. National Centre for Public Administration and Local Government. (2010). Study for the Restructure of Local Government of the Republic of Cyprus. [in Greek]. Available at: Accessed 19 Mar 2017.
  29. National School of Government International. (2014). Local Government Reform in Cyprus: Final Options Report. Available at:$file/Local%20Government%20Reform%20in%20Cyprus_Final%20Options%20Report_08%2004%2014.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.
  30. Ongaro, E. (2014). The Relationship Between the New European Governance Emerging from the Fiscal Crisis and Administrative Reforms: Qualitatively Different, Quantitatively Different, or Nothing New? A Plea for a Research Agenda. Administrative Culture, 15(1), 10–20.Google Scholar
  31. Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  32. Ploom, I. (2014). Towards Neoliberal Imperialism?Discussing the Implications of the New European Governance Emerging from the Fiscal Crisis and Administrative Reforms for the Identity of the EU’. Administrative Culture, 15(1), 21–38.Google Scholar
  33. Schafer, C., & Streeck, W. (Eds.). (2013). Politics in the Age of Austerity (240p). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  34. Streeck, W. (2013). The Politics of Public Debt: Neoliberalism, Capitalist Development, and the Restructuring of the State MPIfG Discussion Paper 13/7, Koeln, Max-Plank Institute for the Studies on Societies. Available at: Accessed 22 Mar 2017.
  35. The Municipalities Law. (111/1985). Nicosia: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  36. Tornaritis, K. (1972). Η Το π ική Αυτο δ ιο ίκησις Εν Κύπ ρ ω [Local Self-government in Cyprus] (p. 42). Nicosia. The book by K. Tornaritis is self-published Tornaritis: Scholar
  37. Treasury of the Republic. (2009–2017). Financial Reports 2009–2016. Nicosia: Treasury of the Republic.Google Scholar
  38. Tsangarides, H. (2016). Aglantzia’s Pay as You Throw. Presentation. Available at: Accessed 10 Mar 2017.
  39. University of Nicosia and Institute of Social Innovation. (2013). Implementation and Evaluation of Learning Activities: Report Submitted by University of Nicosia, EDEX Educational Excellence Corporation Ltd, and the Institute of Social Innovation. Doc Number: 2579847. Nicosia: Cyprus Academy of Public AdministrationArchive.Google Scholar
  40. Verheijen, T. (2007). Administrative Capacity in the New EU Member States: The Limits of Innovation? World Bank Working Paper, No. 115. Available at: Accessed 2 Jan 2017.
  41. Wollmann, H. (2016). Local Government Reform: Between Multifunction and Single Purpose Organizations. Local Government Studies, 42(3), 376–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zenios, S. (2012). Creative Cyprus: Reform Policy for the 21st Century Cyprus. Athens: Papazisis (in Greek).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Kirlappos
    • 1
  • Philippos Philippou
    • 1
  • Kalliope Agapiou-Josephides
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Social and Political SciencesUniversity of CyprusNicosiaCyprus

Personalised recommendations