Advertisement

Implant-Supported Overdentures: Benefits and Risks

  • Joseph Nissan
Chapter

Abstract

The restoration of edentulous patients using implant-supported dentures became a very popular treatment modality with world-wide acceptance; however, some principles remain controversial. This chapter emphasizes the uniqueness of implant overdentures and some important considerations when such treatment is planned.

It was concluded that the attachment incorporation techniques are detrimental to the long-term prosthetic aftercare and to the benefit or success of implant-supported overdentures, indicating the implant number to be used, attachment type related to splinting or nonsplinting, the importance of timing in restorations.

References

  1. 1.
    Dye BA, Tan S, Smith V, Lewis BG, Barker LK, Thornton Evans G, et al. Trends in oral health status: United States, 1988–1994 & 1999–2004. Vital Health Stat. 2007;248:1–92.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mojon P, Thomason JM, Walls AGW. The impact of falling rates of edentulism. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17:434–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, Chehade A, Duncan WJ, Gizani S, Head T, Lund JP, MacEntee M, Mericske-Stern R, Mojon P, Morais J, Naert I, Payne AG, Penrod J, Stoker GT, Tawse-Smith A, Taylor TD, Thomason JM, Thomson WM, Wismeijer D. The McGill Consensus Statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Montreal, Quebec, May 24–25, 2002. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17:601–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Locker D. Patient-based assessment of the outcomes of implant therapy: a review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont. 1998;11:453–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thomason JM, Feine J, Exley C, Moynihan P, Muller F, Naert I, Ellis JS, Barclay C, Butterworth C, Scott B, Lynch C, Stewardson D, Smith P, Welfare R, Hyde P, McAndrew R, Fenlon M, Barclay S, Barker D. Mandibular two Implant—supported overdentures as the first choice standard of care for edentulous patients—the York Consensus Statement. Br Dent J. 2009;207(4):185–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ettinger RL. Tooth loss in an overdenture population. J Prosthetic Dent. 1988;60:459–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Toolson LB, Taylor TD. A 10-year report of a longitudinal recall of overdenture patients. J Prosthetic Dent. 1989;62:179–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fenton AH, Hahn N. Tissue response to overdenture therapy. J Prosthet Dent. 1978;40:492–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ettinger RL, Qian F. Abutment tooth loss in patients with overdentures. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004;135(6):739–46. quiz 795–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Awad MA, Lund JP, Dufresne E, Feine JS. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle–aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16:117–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bergendal T, Engquist B. Implant–supported overdentures: a longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13:253–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Burns DR. Mandibular implant overdenture treatment: consensus and controversy. J Prosthodont. 2000;9:37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Doundoulakis JH, Eckert SE, Lindquist CC, Jeffcoat MK, Doundoulakis JH, Eckert SE, et al. The implant-supported overdenture as an alternative to the complete mandibular denture. J Am Dental Assoc. 2003;134:1455–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jemt T, Chai J, Harnett J, Heath MR, Hutton JE, Johns RB, McKenna S, McNamara DC, van Steenberghe D, Taylor R, Watson RM, Herrmann I. A 5-year prospective multicenter. Follow-up report on overdentures supported by osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant. 1996;11:291–8.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mericske-Stern R. Clinical evaluation of overdenture restorations supported by Osseointegrated titanium implants: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant. 1990;5:375–83.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vercruyssen M, Marcelis K, Coucke W, Naert I, Quirynen M. Long-term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient-centered outcome) of the two-implants-supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 1: survival rate. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21(4):357–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pjetursson B, Lang NP. Prosthetic treatment planning on the basis of scientific evidence. J Oral Rehab. 2008;35(Suppl. 1):72–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Van't Hof MA, Visser A. A controlled clinical trial of implant- Retained mandibular overdentures: 10 years’ results of clinical aspects and aftercare of IMZ implants and Brånemark implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15(4):421–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: a mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years. J Prosthet Dent. 1972;27(2):120–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Takanashi Y, Penrod JR, Lund JP, Feine JS. A cost comparison of mandibular two-implant. Overdenture and conventional denture treatment. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17(2):181–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Naert I, Alsaadi G, Quirynen M. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 10-year randomized clinical study. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17(4):401–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wennstrom JL, Bengazi F, Lekholm U. The influence of the masticatory mucosa on the peri-implant soft tissue condition. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1994;5:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Winkler S, Morris HF, Ochi S. Implant survival to 36 months as related to length and diameter. Ann Periodontol. 2000;5:22–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wismeijer D, Van Waas MA, Vermeeren JI, Mulder J, Kalk W. Patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures. A comparison of three treatment strategies with ITI-dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;26:263–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Visser A, Meijer HJA, Raghoebar GM, Vising A. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus conventional dentures: 10 years of care and aftercare. Int J Prosthodont. 2006;19:271–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stoker GT, Wismeijer D, van Waas MA, Stoker GT, Wismeijer D, van Waas MAJ. An eight-year follow-up to a randomized clinical trial of aftercare and cost-analysis with three types of mandibular implant-retained overdentures. Dent Res. 2007;86:276–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sadoski SJ. Mandibular implant-retained overdentures: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;86:468–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fueki K, Kimoto K, Ogawa T, Garrett NR. Effect of implant supported or retained dentures on masticatory performance: a systematic review. J Prosthetic Dent. 2007;98:470–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bakke M, Holm B, Gotfredsen K, Bakke M, Holm B, Gotfredsen K. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study. Int J Prosthodont. 2002;15:575–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Taylor TD, Wiens J, Carr A. Evidence-based considerations for removable prosthodontic and dental implant occlusion: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94(6):555–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gulizio MP, Agar JR, Kelly JR, Taylor TD. Effect of implant angulation upon retention of overdenture attachments. J Prosthodont. 2005;14(1):3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pressel HW. Overdentures made easy: a guide to implant and root supported prostheses. Chicago: Quintessence; 1996. p. 81–105.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chung KH, Chung CY, Cagna DR, Cronin RJ Jr. Retention characteristics of attachment systems for implant overdentures. J Prosthodont. 2004;13:221–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Alsabeeha NH, Payne AG, Swain MV. Attachment systems for mandibular two-implant overdentures: a review of in vitro investigations on retention and wear features. Int J Prosthodont. 2009;22:429–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Stoumpis C, Kohal RJ. To splint or not to splint oral implants in the implant-supported overdenture therapy? A systematic literature review. J Oral Rehabil. 2011;38(11):857–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Alsabeeha N, Atieh M, Payne AG. Loading protocols for mandibular implant overdentures: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010;12(Suppl 1):e28–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90(2):121–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cehreli MC, Karasoy D, Kokat AM, Akca K, Eckert SE. Systematic review of prosthetic maintenance requirements for implant-supported overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25(1):163–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Nissan J, Oz-Ari B, Gross O, Ghelfan O, Chaushu G. Long term prosthetic aftercare of direct vs. indirect attachment incorporation techniques to mandibular implant-supported overdenture. Clin Oral Imp Res. 2011;22(6):627–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph Nissan
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Oral-RehabilitationSchool of Dental-Medicine, Tel-Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
  2. 2.Rabin Medical-Center, Belinson HospitalPetah-TikvaIsrael

Personalised recommendations