Limits of Complete Denture Rehabilitation

  • Alexandre Mersel


Demographic studies indicate a constant increase in the elderly population. The overall number of people aged over 60 years is expected to double, from 605 million to 2 billion from 2000 to 2050 (WHO 2013a).


  1. 1.
    The current evidence of dental care and oral health for achieving healthy longevity in aging society. Japan Dent Assoc. 2015;1:6–11.
  2. 2.
    United Nations Department of Economics and Social Affairs: Population Division. World Population Aging; Life expectancy; 2015. p. 49–55.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ettinger R. Cohort differences among aging populations: a challenge for the dental profession. Spec Care Dentist. 1992;13(1):19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    MacEntee MI. Clinical epidemiological concerns and the geriatric prosthodontic patient. J Prosthet Dentistry. 1994;72:487–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mersel A, Better H. A minimalistic management approach for the compromised elderly patient. Stoma Edu J. 2015;2(2):140–4.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Porto de Deco C, et al. Taste alteration, moth dryness and teeth staining as side effects of medications taken by elderly. Braz J Oral Sci. 2014;13(4):257–60.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mersel A. Atypical edentulous patients. A gerodontic approach. Dent Asia. 2007;3(4):31–4.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Manoharan S, et al. Ill fitting dentures and oral cancer; a meta-analysis. Oral Oncol. 2014;50(11):1058–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pandey A, et al. Gerodontics: a boon for the oral health of geriatric patients. Int Med J. 2014;21(3):328–30.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Douglas CW, et al. Will there be a need of complete dentures in the United States in 2020? J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Muller F. Interventions for edentate elders – what is the evidence? Gerodontology. 2014;31:44–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Holm-Pedersen P, et al. Dental care for aging population in Denmark, Sweden, Norway, United Kingdom and Germany. J Dent Educ. 2005;69(9):987–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hustey FM, et al. The effects of the mental status screening the care of elderly patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;41(5):678–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jennings DE. Treatment of the mandibular compromised ridge: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;61:575–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Margaret CO, et al. Patient satisfaction and oral health quality of life after treatment with traditional and simplified protocols for complete denture construction. Gerodontology. 2015;32:247–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Van der Waas M. Determinants of dissatisfaction with dentures: a multiple regression analysis. J Prosthet Dentistry. 1990;64:569–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tau S, et al. Spatial relationship between anatomic landmarks in edentulous patients. A radiographic study. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;50(3):314–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kern JS. The randomized shortened dental arch study: influence of two different treatments on interdental spacing over 5 years. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21:1945–51. Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mersel A. Gerodontology—a contemporary prosthetic challenge. I. Mandibular impression technique. Gerodontology. 1987;6(1):79–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mersel A, et al. Computerized study of the occlusal plane of location in elderly patients. Dent Asia. 2006;5(6):14–21.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mersel A. Etude de la fiabilite du plan de Camper comme plan d’orientation en prothese complete. Odontologia. 1986;7:209–13.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Canger EM, Celenk P. Radiographic evaluation of alveolar heights of dentate and edentulous patients. Gerodontology. 2012;29:17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brunton PA, McCord FJ. An anlysis of nasolabial angles and their relevance to tooth position in the edentulous patient. Eur J Prosthodont Res Dent. 1993;2(2):3–56.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mersel A, Ehrlich J. Connection between incisive papilla, central incisors and rugae canina. Quintessence Int. 1981;12(1080):1327–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Faber BL. Comparison of an anatomic versus physiologic method of posterior tooth placement for complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;67(3):410–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Carlsson GE. Critical review of some dogmas in prosthodontics. J Prosthodont Res. 2008;53(2009):3–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Agarwal S, et al. A simplified approach for recording neutral zone. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2010;10(2):102–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mersel A, Lowenthal U. Anxious anticipation of complete dentures. Spec Care Dentist. 1986;6(3):129–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mersel A, Peretz B. A behavioural approach in the treatment of elderly patients: a new philosophy. Int Dent J. 2003;53:51–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Miranda BB, et al. Patient’s perceptions of benefits and risks of complete denture therapy. J Prosthodont. 2014;4:1–6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.FDI Europe Continuing Education ProgramGenevaSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations