Photography of Dermatological Laser Treatment

  • Shraddha Desai
  • Ashish C. BhatiaEmail author


The art and science of photography has evolved tremendously in the past decade, providing the practitioner of cutaneous laser procedures with a versatile and useful set of tools to enhance this procedure, ultimately improving patient care. The use of photography in cutaneous laser therapy is extensive. It encompasses the documentation of before-and-after assessments and long-term reviews of various skin conditions treated via laser therapy. Treated lesions and/or any potential complications that may arise after a procedure can be monitored closely. This is benefitted by the ability to upload these photos directly to the patient’s electronic medical record (EMR). Here, the photographs are readily accessible for follow-up patient visit and allows for communication between physicians regarding identification of lesions and the treatments performed. Furthermore, outside of the clinical setting photography is an invaluable tool in the education of trainees, peers, and the general public. However, appropriate and standardized digital photographs are essential for these benefits to be realized.


Photography Dermatology Digital camera Digital single lens reflex (DSLR) Electronic medical record (EMR) Tablet Dermatologic surgery Standardized photos Laser Technique 


  1. 1.
    Acetta P, Acetta J, Kostecki J. The use of digital cameras by US dermatologists. JAAD. 2013;69(5):837–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sasson M, Schiff T, et al. Photography without film: low-cost digital cameras come of age in dermatology. Int J Dermatol. 1994;33(2):113–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stone JL, Peterson RL, et al. Digital imaging techniques in dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990;23(5 Pt 1):913–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bhatia AC, Desai S, Brodell RT, Horvath MM. Digital photography. eMedicine website. Available at Accessed 1 July 2010.
  5. 5.
    Chilukuri S, Bhatia AC. Practical digital photography in the dermatology office. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2008;27(1):83–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lin BB, Taylor RS, et al. Digital photography for mapping Mohs micrographic surgery sections. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27(4):411–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Taheri A, Yentzer BA, Feldman SR. Focusing and depth of field in photography: application in dermatology practice. Skin Res Technol. 2013;19:394–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kunde L, McMeniman E, Parker M. Clinical photography in dermatology: ethical and medico-legal considerations in the age of digital and smartphone technology. Australas J Dermatol. 2013;54:192–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lakdawala N, Fontanella D, Grant-Kels JM. Ethical considerations in dermatologic photography. Clin Dermatol. 2012;30:486–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bhatia AC, et al. The clinical image archiving clinical processes and an entire specialty. Arch Dermatol. 2006;142(1):96–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Balakrishnan N, Sathish BP, Handattu S. A simple instrument designed to provide consistent digital facial images in dermatology. Indian J Dermatol. 2013;58(3):194–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dermatology Institute of DuPage Medical GroupNapervilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of DermatologyNorthwestern University – Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Oak DermatologySchaumburgUSA

Personalised recommendations