Advertisement

The Business Legitimacy and Its Relationship with the Corporate Social Responsibility: Analysis of Mexico and Spain Through the Case Method

  • Evaristo Galeana Figueroa
  • Sandra Escamilla SolanoEmail author
  • Dora Aguilasocho Montoya
  • Paola Plaza Casado
Chapter

Abstract

The main objective of this research is to analyze the relationship between corporate social responsibility and social legitimacy. This is to fill the existing gap in the literature on legitimacy, in relation to the lack of empirical studies linking social responsibility with legitimacy. In order to analyze the relationships raised, we use an inductive methodology, for it will carry out a case study on the eight companies, three Mexican and five Spanish, included in the Fortune World’s Most Admired Companies for the period 2011–2012. The main finding that can be drawn is that it shows that there is a positive relationship between CSR and social legitimacy to business results. Also given the limited literature and research in Spanish companies, this study has demonstrated that Spanish companies also support these relationships, that is, both the social legitimacy as CSR can bring value to the results of the company. From a strategic point of view, managers might consider legitimacy within its strategic objectives. Managers must realize that not being able to manage legitimacy could involve the loss of it. It is no coincidence that companies with greater decreases of legitimacy are those with more internal and external problems. The main contribution of the study is to fill the gap in literature on legitimacy that relates to CSR as well as the lack of empirical studies in this field.

Keywords

Legitimacy Corporate social responsibility Market value Spain Mexico Case method World’s most admired companies 

References

  1. Abrahamson, E., & Fairchild, G. (1999). Management fashion: Lifecycles, triggers, and collective learning processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. (2001). Learning from successful local private firms in China: Establishing legitimacy. Academy of Management Executive, 15(4), 72–83.Google Scholar
  3. Alcantara, L., Mitsuhashi, H., & Hoshino, Y. (2006). Legitimacy in international joint ventures: It is still needed. Journal of International Management, 12(4), 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. (2004). Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 93–103.Google Scholar
  7. Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717–736.Google Scholar
  8. Barnett, M. L. (2007). Tarred and untarred by the same brush: Exploring interdependence in the volatility of stock returns. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barreto, I., & Baden-Fuller, C. (2006). To conform or to perform? Mimetic behaviour, legitimacy-based groups and performance consequences. Journal of Management Studies, 43(7), 1559–1581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beelitz, A., & Merkl-Davies, D. M. (2011). Using discourse to restore organisational legitimacy: “Ceo-speak” after an incident in a german nuclear power plant. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(1), 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bhattacharya, C., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bianchi, C. C., & Ostale, E. (2006). Lessons learned from unsuccessful internationalization attempts: Examples of multinational retailers in Chile. Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 140–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brickley, J., Smithjr, C., & Zimmerman, J. (2002). Business ethics and organizational architecture. Journal of Banking & Finance, 26(9), 1821–1835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brønn, P. S., & Vidaver-Cohen, D. (2008). Corporate motives for social initiative: Legitimacy, sustainability, or the bottom line? Journal of Business Ethics, 87(S1), 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brown, A. D. (1998). Narrative, politics and legitimacy in an IT implementation. Journal of Management Studies, 35(1), 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen, H., Cotsakos, C. M., Griffith, D. A., & Hu, M. Y. (2006). The influence of liability of foreignness on market entry strategies: An illustration of market entry in China. International Marketing Review, 23(6), 636–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Choi, Y. R., & Shepherd, D. A. (2005). Stakeholder perceptions of age and other dimensions of newness. Journal of Management, 31(4), 573–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Claasen, C., & Roloff, J. (2012). The link between responsibility and legitimacy: The case of de beers in namibia. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(3), 379–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cohen, B., & Dean, T. (2005). Information asymmetry and investor valuation of IPOs: Top management team legitimacy as a capital market signal. Strategic Management Journal, 26(7), 683–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Deeds, D. L., Mang, P. Y., & Frandsen, M. L. (2004). The influence of firms’ and industries’ legitimacy on the flow of capital into high-technology ventures. Strategic Organization, 2(1), 9–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Deephouse, D., & Carter, S. (2005). An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 329–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Deephouse, D., & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 49–77). London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Deephouse, D. L. (1996). Does isomorphism legitimate? Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 1024–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Díez-Martín, F., Blanco-González, A., & Prado-Román, C. (2010). Medición de la legitimidad organizativa: el caso de las Sociedades de Garantía Recíproca. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 43(junio), 115–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Díez-Martín, F., Prado-Román, C., & Blanco-González, A. (2013). Efecto del plazo de ejecución estratégica sobre la obtención de legitimidad organizativa. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 19, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedee.2013.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. The Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Driver, M. (2006). Beyond the stalemate of economics versus ethics: Corporate social responsibility and the discourse of the organizational self. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(4), 337–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Elsbach, K. D., & Sutton, R. I. (1992). Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 699–738.Google Scholar
  31. Escamilla, S., Plaza, P., & Flores, S. (2016). Análisis de la divulgación de la información sobre la responsabilidad social corporativa en las empresas de transporte público urbano en España. Revista de Contabilidad – Spanish Accounting Review, 19(2), 195–203.Google Scholar
  32. Fombrun, C. J. (2005). The leadership challenge: Building resilient corporate reputations. In J. P. Doh & S. A. Stumpf (Eds.), Handbook on responsible leadership and governance in global business (pp. 54–68). Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  33. Fornell, C., Mithas, S., Morgeson, F. V., & Krishnan, M. S. (2006). Customer satisfaction and stock prices: High returns, low risk. Journal of Marketing, 70(1), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management. A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  35. Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Godfrey, P. C., & Hatch, N. W. (2007). Researching corporate social responsibility: An agenda for the 21st century. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(1), 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Halgin, D. S. (2006). The influence of legitimacy on career trajectories of individuals in leadership positions: NCAA basketball. Academy of Management Best Conference Paper 2006, 1–7.Google Scholar
  38. Hannan, M., & Carroll, G. (1995). Organizational evolution in a multinational context: Entries of automobile manufacturers in Belgium, Britain, France, Germany, and Italy. American Sociological Review, 60(4), 509–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hannan, M. T., & Carroll, G. (1992). In J. J. Boonstra (Ed.), Dynamics of organizational populations: Density, legitimation, and competition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Hart, S. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Higgins, M., & Gulati, R. (2003). Getting off to a good start: The effects of upper echelon affiliations on underwriter prestige. Organization Science, 14(3), 244–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Higgins, M., & Gulati, R. (2006). Stacking the deck: The effects of top management backgrounds on investor decisions. Strategic Management Journal, 27(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Husted, B. W. (2005). Risk management, real options, corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(2), 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Johnson, P., & Smith, K. (1999). Contextualizing business ethics: Anomie and social life. Human Relations, 52(11), 1351–1375.Google Scholar
  45. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard translating strategy in action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  46. Kleinrichert, D. (2008). Ethics, power and communities: Corporate social responsibility revisited. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(3), 475–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 64–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lai, C.-S., Chiu, C.-J., Yang, C.-F., & Pai, D.-C. (2010). The effects of corporate social responsibility on brand performance: The mediating effect of industrial brand equity and corporate reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 457–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lamberti, L., & Lettieri, E. (2011). Gaining legitimacy in converging industries: Evidence from the emerging market of functional food. European Management Journal, 29(6), 462–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lamertz, K., & Baum, J. A. C. (2009). The legitimacy of organizational downsizing in Canada: An analysis of explanatory media accounts. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 15(1), 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lin, E., Lin, T. M. Y., & Lin, B.-W. (2010). New high-tech venturing as process of resource accumulation. Management Decision, 48(8), 1230–1246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mackey, A., Mackey, T. B., & Barney, J. A. Y. B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 817–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Maxfield, S. (2008). Reconciling corporate citizenship and competitive strategy: Insights from economic theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(2), 367–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mcwilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Guest editors’ introduction corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(January), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00580.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Newbert, S. L. (2008). Value, rareness, competitive advantage, and performance: A conceptual-level empirical investigation of the resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 29(7), 745–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ngobo, P.-V., Casta, J.-F., & Ramond, O. (2011). Is customer satisfaction a relevant metric for financial analysts? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 480–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Niven, P. R. (2005). In J. W. & Sons (Ed.), Balanced scorecard diagnostics: Maintaining maximum performance. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  62. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pollack, J. M., Rutherford, M. W., & Nagy, B. G. (2012). Preparedness and cognitive legitimacy as antecedents of new venture funding in televised business pitches. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(5), 915–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pollock, T., & Rindova, V. (2003). Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. The Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 631–642.Google Scholar
  66. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  67. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92. 163.Google Scholar
  68. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(February), 62–77.Google Scholar
  69. Rao, R. S., Chandy, R. K., & Prabhu, J. C. (2008). The fruits of legitimacy: Why some new ventures gain more from innovation than others. Journal of Marketing, 72(4), 58–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rust, R. T., Lemon, K. N., & Zeithaml, V. A. (2004). Return on marketing: Using customer equity to focus marketing strategy. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 109–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  72. Shepherd, D., & Zacharakis, A. (2003). A new venture’s cognitive legitimacy: An assessment by customers. Journal of Small Business Management, 41(2), 148–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Singh, J., Tucker, D., & House, R. (1986). Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(2), 171–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Smith, N. C. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: Whether or how? California Management Review, 45(4), 52–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Starr, J. A., & MacMillan, I. C. (1990). Resource cooptation via social contracting: Resource acquisition strategies for new ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 11(4), 79–92.Google Scholar
  76. Staw, B. M., & Epstein, L. D. (2000). What bandwagons bring: Effects of popular management techniques on corporate performance, reputation, and ceo pay. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 523–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Tornikoski, E. T., & Newbert, S. L. (2007). Exploring the determinants of organizational emergence: A legitimacy perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(2), 311–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Varadarajan, P. R., & Menon, A. (1988). Cause-related marketing: A coalignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Woodruff, R. B. (1997). Customer value: The next source for competitive advantage. Academy of Marketing Science, 25(2), 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Yin, R. K. (2009). In L. Bickman & D. J. Rog (Eds.), Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  83. Zaheer, S. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 341–363.Google Scholar
  84. Zimmerman, M., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. The Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zucker, L. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zuckerman, E. (1999). The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), 1398–1438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Zuckerman, E. (2000). Focusing the corporate product: Securities analysts and de-diversification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 591–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Evaristo Galeana Figueroa
    • 1
  • Sandra Escamilla Solano
    • 2
    Email author
  • Dora Aguilasocho Montoya
    • 1
  • Paola Plaza Casado
    • 2
  1. 1.Facultad de Contaduría y Ciencias Administrativas, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de HidalgoMoreliaMexico
  2. 2.Department of Business EconomicsRey Juan Carlos UniversityMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations