Advertisement

Drones, Camera Innovations and Conceptions of Human Rights

  • Austin Choi-Fitzpatrick
Chapter
Part of the Global Transformations in Media and Communication Research - A Palgrave and IAMCR Series book series (GTMCR)

Abstract

Choi-Fitzpatrick looks at the evolution of camera devices from camera obscura to satellites and drones to illustrate not only the different ways of seeing they generate but also the various imaginaries they sustain about what human rights are or could be. By questioning how the camera, as an object of inquiry in its own right, drives the forms, meanings and effects of human rights images, he cautions against technological determinism. New devices complement data-gathering and storytelling efforts, but they also strain existing laws and norms about transparency, accountability and surveillance. Drones pierce old arrangements and empower agents in the process.

References

  1. Ausbrook, R. (2015, July 30). The Once and Future Drone. New America Weekly. https://www.newamerica.org/weekly/88/the-once-and-future-drones/.
  2. Azoulay, A. (2015). Civil Imagination: A Political Ontology of Photography. New York, NY: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biggs, M. (2016). Size Matters Quantifying Protest by Counting Participants. Sociological Methods & Research.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124116629166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Braidotti, R. (2006). Posthuman, All Too Human: Towards a New Process Ontology. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(7–8), 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. British Broadcasting Service (BBC). (2014). BBCTrending: Syrian ‘Hero Boy’ Video Faked by Norwegian Director. Available at http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-30057401.
  8. Burstein, P. (2003). The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: A Review and an Agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56(1), 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Choi-Fitzpatrick, A. (2014). Drones for Good: Technological Innovations, Social Movements, and the State. Journal of International Affairs, 68(1), 19.Google Scholar
  10. Choi-Fitzpatrick, A., Chavarria, D., Cychosz, E., Dingens, J. P., Duffey, M., Koebel, K., Siriphanh, M., Tulen, Y., Watanabe, H., Juskauskas, T., & Holland, J. (2016). Up in the Air: A Global Estimate of Non-violent Drone Use 2009–2015. The Good Drone Lab, Kroc School of Peace Studies and Center for Media, Data, and Society, Central European University. Available at digital.sandiego.edu/gdl2016report/1/.
  11. Choi-Fitzpatrick, A., & Juskauskas, T. (2015). Up in the Air: Applying the Jacobs Crowd Formula to Drone Imagery. Procedia Engineering, 107, 273–281. Available at  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.06.082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crary, J. (1992). Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Douglas, L. (2005). The Memory of Judgment: Making Law and History in the Trials of the Holocaust. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fehrenbach, H., & Rodogno, D. (Eds.). (2015). Humanitarian Photography. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Goldberg, V. (1991). The Power of Photography: How Photographs Changed Our Lives. New York, NY: Abbeville Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hancock, I. (2002). We Are the Romani People. Hatfield, UK: University of Herfordshire Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hanson, R. (2016). The Age of Em: Work, Love, and Life When Robots Rule the Earth. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Hunt, L. A. (2007). Inventing Human Rights: A History. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  20. Ignatieff, M. (2000). Virtual War: Kosovo and Beyond. New York, NY: Picador USA.Google Scholar
  21. Kennedy, L., & Patrick, C. (Eds). (2014). The Violence of the Image: Photography and International Conflict. New York, NY: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  22. Kofman, S. (1998). Camera Obscura: Of Ideology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kimmelman, M. (2016, October 14). Berlin, 1945; Grozny, 2000; Aleppo, 2016. New York Times.Google Scholar
  24. Linfield, S. (2011). The Cruel Radiance: Photography and Political Violence. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Livingston, S. (2016). Digital Affordances and Human Rights Advocacy. SFB-Governance Working Paper Series, no. 69.Google Scholar
  26. Livingston, S. (2017). Disinformation Campaigns Target Tech-enabled Citizen Journalists. Brookings Institution. Available at https://www.brookings.edu/blog/techtank/2017/03/02/disinformation-campaigns-target-tech-enabled-citizen-journalists/.
  27. Markoff, J. (2016). Drones Marshaled to Drop Lifesaving Supplies Over Rwandan Terrain. New York Times. Available at https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/05/technology/drones-marshaled-to-drop-lifesaving-supplies-over-rwandan-terrain.html?_r=0.
  28. Mirzoeff, N. (2011). The Right to Look. Critical Inquiry, 37(3), 473–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. NASA. (2017). CubeSat Launch Initiative. Available at https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/heo/home/CubeSats_initiative.
  30. Parks, L. (2001). Satellite Views of Srebrenica: Tele-visuality and the Politics of Witnessing. Social Identities, 7(4), 585–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ristovska, S. (2014). Witnessing and the Failure of Communication. The Communication Review, 17(2), 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ristovska, S. (2016). The Rise of Eyewitness Video and Its Implications for Human Rights: Conceptual and Methodological Approaches. Journal of Human Rights, 15(3), 347–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rose, G. (2016). Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Scarborough, R. (2017). How ISIS-Controlled Drones like This Are Striking New Fear Within the U.S. Military. Washington Post. Available at www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jan/24/isis-drone-dropping-precision-bombs-alarms-us-mili/.
  35. Shaar, A., & Choi-Fitzpatrick, A. (2017). Struggle Over Aleppo’s Story Takes to the Skies: How Citizen Journalists Used Drone Technology to Challenge the Assad Regime’s Narrative of Aleppo’s Plight. Al Jazeera. Available at www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2017/02/struggle-aleppo-story-takes-skies-170221105309042.html.
  36. Sealy, M., Malbert, R., & Lobb, A. (2008). Documenting Disposable People: Contemporary Global Slavery. London, UK: Hayward Gallery.Google Scholar
  37. Sliwinski, S. (2006). The Childhood of Human Rights: The Kodak on the Congo. Journal of Visual Culture, 5(3), 333–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sliwinski, S. (2011). Human Rights in Camera. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Silverman, K. (2015). The Miracle of Analogy: Or The History of Photography (Vol. 1). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Stevens, J. R. (2016). Scandal’s Role in Creating a Surveillance Culture. In Scandal in a Digital Age (pp. 15–27). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan US.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Thompson, E. P. (1991). The Making of the English Working Class. Toronto, CN: Penguin.Google Scholar
  42. Tilly, C. (1999). From Interactions to Outcomes in Social Movements. In M. Giugni, D. McAdam, & C. Tilly (Eds.), How Social Movements Matter (pp. 253–270). Minnesota, MN: University Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  43. Tufekci, Z. (2014). Engineering the Public: Big Data, Surveillance and Computational Politics. First Monday, 19(7).Google Scholar
  44. Whittle, R. (2014). Predator: The Secret Origins of the Drone Revolution. New York: Henry Holt and Co.Google Scholar
  45. Zeller, B. (2005). The Blue and Gray in Black and White: A History of Civil War Photography. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Austin Choi-Fitzpatrick
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of San DiegoSan DiegoUSA
  2. 2.University of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations