A Hybrid Technique for Residential Load Scheduling in Smart Grids Demand Side Management

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies book series (LNDECT, volume 17)


Demand side management (DSM) and demand response (DR) are the key functions in smart grids (SGs). DR provides an opportunity to a consumer in making decisions and shifting load from on-peak hours to off-peak hours. The number of incentive base pricing tariffs are established by a utility for the consumers to reduce electricity consumption and manage consumers load in order to minimize the peak to average ratio (PAR). Throughout the world, these different pricing approaches are in use. Time of use tariff (ToU) is considered in this paper, to comparatively evaluate the performance of the heuristic algorithms; bacterial foraging algorithm (BFA), and harmony search algorithm (HSA). A hybridization of BFA and HSA (HBH) is also proposed to evaluate the performance parameters; such as electricity consumption cost and PAR. Furthermore, consumer satisfaction level in terms of waiting time is also evaluated in this research work. Simulation results validate that proposed scheme effectively accomplish desired objectives while considering the user comfort.


Bacterial foraging algorithm (BFA) Harmony search algorithm (HSA) Smart grids (SGs) Demand response (DR) Peak to average ratio (PAR) 


  1. 1.
    Wen, Z., ONeill, D., Maei, H.: Optimal demand response using device-based reinforcement learning. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 6(5), 2312–2324 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Setlhaolo, D., Xia, X., Zhang, J.: Optimal scheduling of household appliances for demand response. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 116, 24–28 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shirazi, E., Jadid, S.: Optimal residential appliance scheduling under dynamic pricing scheme via HEMDAS. Energy Build. 93, 40–49 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rahim, S., Javaid, N., Ahmad, A., Khan, S.A., Khan, Z.A., Alrajeh, N., Qasim, U.: Exploiting heuristic algorithms to efficiently utilize energy management controllers with renewable energy sources. Energy Build. 129, 452–470 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Manzoor, A., Ahmed, F., Judge, M.A., Ahmed, A., Tahir, M.A.U.H., Khan, Z.A., Qasim, U., Javaid, N.: User comfort oriented residential power scheduling in smart homes. In: International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 171–180. Springer, Cham (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Abushnaf, J., Rassau, A., Grnisiewicz, W.: Impact on electricity use of introducing time-of-use pricing to a multi-user home energy management system. Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst. 26(5), 993–1005 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jovanovic, R., Bousselham, A., Bayram, I.S.: Residential demand response scheduling with consideration of consumer preferences. Appl. Sci. 6(1), 16 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Passino, K.M.: Biomimicry of bacterial foraging for distributed optimization and control. IEEE Control Syst. 22(3), 52–67 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Das, S., Biswas, A., Dasgupta, S., Abraham, A.: Bacterial foraging optimization algorithm: theoretical foundations, analysis, and applications. In: Foundations of Computational Intelligence, vol. 3, pp. 23–55. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang, X., Gao, X.Z., Zenger, K.: An Introduction to Harmony Search Optimization Method. Springer (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.COMSATS Institute of Information TechnologyIslamabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations