Advertisement

Flying Ad Hoc Network for Emergency Applications Connected to a Fog System

  • Dan RaduEmail author
  • Adrian Cretu
  • Benoît Parrein
  • Jiazi Yi
  • Camelia Avram
  • Adina Aştilean
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies book series (LNDECT, volume 17)

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to improve the efficiency of vegetation fire emergency interventions by using MP-OLSR routing protocol for data transmission in Flying Ad Hoc NETwork (FANET) applications. The presented conceptual system design could potentially increase the rescuing chances of people caught up in natural disaster environments, the final goal being to provide public safety services to interested parties. The proposed system architecture model relies on emerging technologies (Internet of Things & Fog, Smart Cities, Mobile Ad Hoc Networks) and actual concepts available in the scientific literature. The two main components of the system consist in a FANET, capable of collecting fire detection data from GPS and video enabled drones, and a Fog/Edge node that allows data collection and analysis, but also provides public safety services for interested parties. The sensing nodes forward data packets through multiple mobile hops until they reach the central management system. A proof of concept based on MP-OLSR routing protocol for efficient data transmission in FANET scenarios and possible public safety rescuing services is given.

References

  1. Al-Fuqaha, A., Guizani, M., Mohammadi, M., Aledhari, M., Ayyash, M.: Internet of things: a survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials. 17(4), 2347–2376 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2015.2444095 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ang, L.M., Seng, K.P., Zungeru, A.M., Ijemaru, G.K.: Big sensor data systems for smart cities. IEEE Int. Things J. 4(5), 1259–1271 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2017.2695535 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bekmezci, I., Sahingoz, O.K., Temel, Ş.: Flying ad-hoc networks (fanets): a survey. Ad Hoc Netw. 11(3), 1254–1270 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.12.004. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570870512002193 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bekmezci, I., Sen, I., Erkalkan, E.: Flying ad hoc networks (fanet) test bed implementation. In: 2015 7th International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies (RAST), pp. 665–668 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1109/RAST.2015.7208426
  5. Confais, B., Lèbre, A., Parrein, B.: An object store service for a fog/edge computing infrastructure based on IPFS and scale-out NAS. In: 1st IEEE International Conference on Fog and Edge Computing - ICFEC 2017, Madrid, Spain (2017a). https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01483702
  6. Confais, B., Lèbre, A., Parrein, B.: Performance Analysis of Object Store Systems in a Fog and Edge Computing Infrastructure. Transactions on Large-Scale Data- and Knowledge-Centered Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (2017b).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55696-2_2. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01587459
  7. Cruz, H., Eckert, M., Meneses, J.M., Martínez, J.: Efficient forest fire detection index for application in unmanned aerial systems (UASS). Sensors 16(6), 893 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Haerri, J., Filali, F., Bonnet, C.: Performance comparison of AODV and OLSR in vanets urban environments under realistic mobility patterns. In: 5th IFIP Mediterranean Ad-Hoc Networking Workshop, Med-Hoc-Net 2006, June, Lipari, ITALY, pp. 14–17 (2006)Google Scholar
  9. Jacquet, P., Muhlethaler, P., Clausen, T., Laouiti, A., Qayyum, A., Viennot, L.: Optimized link state routing protocol for ad hoc networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Multi Topic Conference, 2001, IEEE INMIC 2001, Technology for the 21st Century, pp. 62–68 (2001)Google Scholar
  10. Lin, J., Yu, W., Zhang, N., Yang, X., Zhang, H., Zhao, W.: A survey on internet of things: Architecture, enabling technologies, security and privacy, and applications. IEEE Int. Things J. 4(5), 1125–1142 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2017.2683200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Oubbati, O.S., Lakas, A., Zhou, F., Güneş, M., Yagoubi, M.B.: A survey on position-based routing protocols for flying ad hoc networks (FANETS). Veh. Commun. 10, 29–56 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vehcom.2017.10.003. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214209617300529 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pham, H.X., La, H.M., Feil-Seifer, D., Deans, M.: A distributed control framework for a team of unmanned aerial vehicles for dynamic wildfire tracking. CoRR abs/1704.02630 (2017). http://arxiv.org/abs/1704.02630
  13. Radu, D., Avram, C., Aştilean, A., Parrein, B., Yi, J.: Acoustic noise pollution monitoring in an urban environment using a vanet network. In: Proceedings of 2012 IEEE International Conference on Automation, Quality and Testing, Robotics, pp. 244–248 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1109/AQTR.2012.6237711
  14. Rosati, S., Krużelecki, K., Heitz, G., Floreano, D., Rimoldi, B.: Dynamic routing for flying ad hoc networks. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 65(3), 1690–1700 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2015.2414819 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S., Frederick, R., Jacobson, V.: RFC 1889: RTP: A transport protocol for real-time applications. Network Working Group Memorandum (1996). http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1889.html
  16. Shi, W., Dustdar, S.: The promise of edge computing. Computer 49(5), 78–81 (2016). http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MC.2016.145 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shi, W., Cao, J., Zhang, Q., Li, Y., Xu, L.: Edge computing: vision and challenges. IEEE Int. Things J. 3(5), 637–646 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2016.2579198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Yanmaz, E., Yahyanejad, S., Rinner, B., Hellwagner, H., Bettstetter, C.: Drone networks: communications, coordination, and sensing. Ad Hoc Netw. 68, 1–15 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2017.09.001. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570870517301671. Advances in Wireless Communication and Networking for Cooperating Autonomous SystemsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yi, J., Adnane, A., David, S., Parrein, B.: Multipath optimized link state routing for mobile ad hoc networks. Ad Hoc Netw. 9(1), 28–47 (2011a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yi, J., Parrein, B., Radu, D.: Multipath routing protocol for manet: application to h.264/svc video content delivery. In: 2011 The 14th International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications (WPMC), pp. 1–5 (2011b)Google Scholar
  21. Zhang, Q., Yu, Z., Shi, W., Zhong, H.: Demo abstract: Evaps: Edge video analysis for public safety. In: 2016 IEEE/ACM Symposium on Edge Computing (SEC) 00(undefined), pp. 121–122 (2016). http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MC.2016.145

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dan Radu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Adrian Cretu
    • 1
  • Benoît Parrein
    • 2
  • Jiazi Yi
    • 3
  • Camelia Avram
    • 1
  • Adina Aştilean
    • 1
  1. 1.Technical University of Cluj-NapocaCluj-NapocaRomania
  2. 2.LS2N, Polytech’NantesNantesFrance
  3. 3.Laboratoire d’Informatique, Ecole PolytechniquePalaiseauFrance

Personalised recommendations