Advertisement

Effectuation, Causation and the Revised Uppsala Model: A Behavioral Analysis of Iranian SMEs’ Internationalization

  • Kamal SakhdariEmail author
  • Shima Saniei
Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)

Abstract

This study examines the boundary conditions of the emerging international entrepreneurship theories in explaining the internationalization of firms in the novel context of Iran. For this purpose, the alternate template strategy is employed to assess the extent to which the behaviors undertaken by the Iranian Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) to enter international markets are consistent with the emerging theories of international entrepreneurship, namely causation, effectuation and the revised Uppsala model. Our multiple case study approach indicates that behaviours suggested by the similar theories of effectuation and revised Uppsala model are dominant among the cases; yet when firms perceive lower level of uncertainty in a market or are not faced with the lack of resource availability, they show causal behaviour. These results provide a better understanding of the process of SMEs’ internationalization in developing countries.

Keywords

Internationalization Effectuation Causation The revised Uppsala model Developing country Iran 

References

  1. Andersson S (2011) International entrepreneurship, born globals and the theory of effectuation. J Small Bus Enterp Dev 18(3):627–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Autio E, Sapienza HJ, Almeida JG (2000) Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Acad Manag J 43(5):909–924Google Scholar
  3. Butler JE, Doktor R, Lins FA (2010) Linking international entrepreneurship to uncertainty, opportunity discovery, and cognition. J Int Entrep 8(2):121–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chandler GN, DeTienne DR, McKelvie A, Mumford TV (2011) Causation and effectuation processes: a validation study. J Bus Ventur 26(3):375–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coviello NE (2006) The network dynamics of international new ventures. J Int Bus Stud 37(5):713–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coviello NE, Jones MV (2004) Methodological issues in international entrepreneurship research. J Bus Ventur 19(4):485–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coviello N, Munro H (1997) Network relationships and the internationalization process of small software firms. Int Bus Rev 6(4):361–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Clercq D, Sapienza HJ, Yavuz RI, Zhou L (2012) Learning and knowledge in early internationalization research: past accomplishments and future directions. J Bus Ventur 27(1):143–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ellis PD (2011) Social ties and international entrepreneurship: opportunities and constraints affecting firm internationalization. J Int Bus Stud 42(1):99–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferro LM, Préfontaine L, Skander D (2009) How do social networks make a difference in the internationalization of high-tech SMEs? The case of Colombia. Int J Entrep Innov 10(3):201–212Google Scholar
  11. Fisher G (2012) Effectuation, causation, and bricolage: a behavioral comparison of emerging theories in entrepreneurship research. Entrep Theory Pract 36(5):1019–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Forsgren M (2016) A note on the revisited Uppsala internationalization process model–the implications of business networks and entrepreneurship. J Int Bus Stud 47(9):1135–1144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hånell SM, Nordman ER, Tolstoy D, Sharma DD (2013) International entrepreneurship research during the last decade: a review. J Int Bus Entrep Dev 7(2):116–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harms R, Schiele H (2012) Antecedents and consequences of effectuation and causation in the international new venture creation process. J Int Entrep 10(2):95–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jantunen A, Puumalainen K, Saarenketo S, Kyläheiko K (2005) Entrepreneurial orientation, dynamic capabilities and international performance. J Int Entrep 3(3):223–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johanson J, Vahlne JE (1977) The internationalization process of the firm—a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. J Int Bus Stud 8(1):23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johanson J, Vahlne JE (2006) Commitment and opportunity development in the internationalization process: a note on the Uppsala internationalization process model. Manag Int Rev 46(2):165–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johanson J, Vahlne JE (2009) The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: from liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. J Int Bus Stud 40(9):1411–1431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones MV, Coviello NE (2005) Internationalization: conceptualising an entrepreneurial process of behavior in time. J Int Bus Stud 36(3):284–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kiss AN, Danis WM, Cavusgil ST (2012) International entrepreneurship research in emerging economies: a critical review and research agenda. J Bus Ventur 27(2):266–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Knudsen T, Madsen TK (2002) Export strategy: a dynamic capabilities perspective. Scand J Manag 18(4):475–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuada J (2006) Internationalization of firms in developing countries: towards an integrated conceptual framework. In: International conference on globalization, internationalization of companies and cross-cultural management, AalborGoogle Scholar
  23. Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad Manage Rev 24(4):691–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Langley A (2009) Studying processes in and around organizations. In: Buchanan DA, Bryman A (eds) The Sage handbook of organizational research methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 409–429Google Scholar
  25. Mainela T, Puhakka V (2009) Organising new business in a turbulent context: opportunity discovery and effectuation for IJV development in transition markets. J Int Entrep 7(2):111–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McDougall PP (1989) International versus domestic entrepreneurship: new venture strategic behavior and industry structure. J Bus Ventur 4(6):387–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McDougall PP, Oviatt BM (2000) International entrepreneurship: the intersection of two research paths. Acad Manage J 43(5):902–906Google Scholar
  28. Musteen M, Datta DK, Francis J (2014) Early internationalization by firms in transition economies into developed markets: the role of international networks. Glob Strateg J 4(3):221–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Oehme M, Bort S (2015) SME internationalization modes in the German biotechnology industry: the influence of imitation, network position, and international experience. J Int Bus Stud 46(6):629–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oviatt BM, McDougall PP (1994) Toward a theory of international new ventures. J Int Bus Stud 25(1):45–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oviatt BM, McDougall PP (2005) Defining international entrepreneurship and modeling the speed of internationalization. Entrep Theory Pract 29(5):537–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peiris IK, Akoorie ME, Sinha P (2012) International entrepreneurship: a critical analysis of studies in the past two decades and future directions for research. J Int Entrep 10(4):279–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Peng MW (2001) The resource-based view and international business. J Manag 27(6):803–829Google Scholar
  34. Rialp A, Rialp J (2007) Faster and more successful exporters: an exploratory study of born global firms from the resource-based view. J Euromarket 16(1-2):71–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sarasvathy SD (2001) Causation and effectuation: toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Acad Manage Rev 26(2):243–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sarasvathy SD (2008) Effectuation: elements of entrepreneurial expertise. Edward Elgar Publishing, CheltenhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sarasvathy S, Kumar K, York JG, Bhagavatula S (2014) An effectual approach to international entrepreneurship: overlaps, challenges, and provocative possibilities. Entrep Theory Pract 38(1):71–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schweizer R (2013) SMEs and networks: overcoming the liability of outsidership. J Int Entrep 11(1):80–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schweizer R (2015) Decision–making during small and medium–sized enterprises’ internationalization-effectuation vs. causation. J Int Bus Entrep Dev 8(1):22–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schweizer R, Vahlne JE, Johanson J (2010) Internationalization as an entrepreneurial process. J Int Entrep 8(4):343–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Weerawardena J, Mort GS, Liesch PW, Knight G (2007) Conceptualizing accelerated internationalization in the born global firm: a dynamic capabilities perspective. J World Bus 42(3):294–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Welch C, Nummela N, Liesch P (2016) The internationalization process model revisited: an agenda for future research. Manag Int Rev 56(6):783–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Welter F, Smallbone D (2011) Institutional perspectives on entrepreneurial behavior in challenging environments. J Small Bus Manag 49(1):107–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yli-Renko H, Autio E, Tontti V (2002) Social capital, knowledge, and the international growth of technology-based new firms. Int Bus Rev 11(3):279–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). International entrepreneurship: the current status of the field and future research agenda.Google Scholar
  46. Zahra SA, Korri JS, Yu J (2005) Cognition and international entrepreneurship: implications for research on international opportunity recognition and exploitation. Int Bus Rev 14(2):129–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhang M, Tansuhaj P, McCullough J (2009) International entrepreneurial capability: the measurement and a comparison between born global firms and traditional exporters in China. J Int Entrep 7(4):292–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhou L, Wu WP, Luo X (2007) Internationalization and the performance of born-global SMEs: the mediating role of social networks. J Int Bus Stud 38(4):673–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EntrepreneurshipUniversity of TehranTehranIran

Personalised recommendations