Advertisement

Ethical Behavior in the Context of Managerial Decision Making and Satisfaction of Employees: Lessons from the Experience of the Post-Transition Country

  • Ivana BulogEmail author
  • Dženan Kulović
  • Ivan Grančić
Chapter

Abstract

Ethics as a term in the transition and post-transition countries is quite often the subject of various researches. The main reason for this is the fact that ethics is one of the key factors for company’s long-term success and that it is almost neglected when certain business decisions are made. In the business environment, decisions must be taken quickly, under time pressure that does not leave much space for rational judgment. Competition, public, superiors, employees, state organs, and private life are such concepts that should be taken into account when a certain business decision is made. Thus, it is very hard for one to think ethically when making decisions in such a complex environment and under such a huge pressure. In today’s modern world, this is extremely demanding, especially for ourselves in our own decision making, for the company we work for, and ultimately for the society as a whole. It is quite clear that decision making is not an easy process for managers.

In addition to the ethical behavior of managers in business decision making, the subject of this work also includes the satisfaction of employees. Ethical decisions made by managers, directly and indirectly, affect employee satisfaction. Employees are those who participate in the realization of numerous decisions made by managers. Both the business success and the future of the company depend on the stated realization. Managers should be aware of their own impact on employees and determine the criteria that make employees satisfied in order to achieve mutual benefit.

Measuring the level of ethics in a company is not possible because it is something intangible, but this chapter will show components and guidelines that can help managers to be more ethical in business decision making. The aim of this chapter is to encourage and raise awareness of the importance of ethical behavior in decision making in every business situation, without exception. Managers can learn how to make an ethical decision using the same learning tools for improving decision making daily. With the use of certain learning tools and ethical principles, managers are able to make decisions that are consistent with socially responsible behavior reflecting positively on the employee satisfaction and the business success eventually.

References

  1. Aleksić, A. (2007). Poslovna etika – elementi uspješnog poslovanja, Zbornik ekonomskog fakulteta u Zagrebu (str. 420–428).Google Scholar
  2. Bahtijarević-Šiber, F. (1999). Management ljudskih potencijala (str. 939–941). Zagreb: Golden Marketing.Google Scholar
  3. Bakotić, D. (2009) Međuovisnost zadovoljstva na radu radnika znanja i organizacijskih performansi. Doktorska disertacija, Split (str. 46–89).Google Scholar
  4. Baron, R. A., & Greenberg, J. (1990). Behaviour in organizations: Understanding and managing the human side of work (p. 165). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  5. Black, S. J., & Steers, R. M. (1994). Organizational behaviour (p. 87). New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Buble, M. (2006). Osnove managementa (str. 60–63). Zagreb: Sinergija nakladništvo.Google Scholar
  7. Cadwell, D. F., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1990). Measuring person-job fit with a profile-comparison process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 648–657.Google Scholar
  8. Daft, R. L. (1992). Organization theory and design (4th ed.p. 346). St. Paul: West Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Daft, R. L., & Marcic, D. (2001). Understanding management (p. 358). Mason, OH: South Western Thomas Learning.Google Scholar
  10. Davis, K., & Newstrom, J. W. (1989). Human behaviour at work (p. 176). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  11. Furnham, A. (1997). The psychology of behaviour at work. The individual in the organization (p. 896). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  12. Gordon, J. R., Mondy, R. W., Sharplin, A., & Premeaux, S. R., (1990). Management and organizational behaviour (p. 173). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  13. Koontz, H., & Weihrich, H. (1990). Essentials of management (5th ed.p. 108). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  14. Leap, T. L., & Crino, M. D. (1993). Personnel/human resource management (p. 61). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  15. Likert, R. (1961). New patterns of management. New York: McGraw-Hill (Preuzeo od: Katz, D., Kahn, R. L. (1967). The social psychology of organizations).Google Scholar
  16. Marušić, S. (1990). Motivacija za rad i profesionalni razvoj (str. 22). Zagreb: Ekonomski institut Zagreb.Google Scholar
  17. Mescon, M., Albert, M., & Khedouri, F. (1985). Management (p. 169). New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  18. Messick, D. M., Bazerman, M. H., & Stewart, L. (2006). Avoiding ethical danger zones (pp. 4–16). Business Roundtable Institute for Corporate Ethics.Google Scholar
  19. Mullins, L. J. (1999). Management and organizational behaviour (p. 631). London: Financial Times, Pitman Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Perić, J. (2011). Poslovna etika. Dostupno na: http://www.efos.unios.hr/arhiva/dokumenti/PE1_Poslovna%20etika_Uvod_25042012.pdf (Pristupljeno 24.08.2016).
  21. Perko-Šeparović, I. (1975). Teorije organizacije (str. 134). Zagreb: Školska knjiga.Google Scholar
  22. Spector, P. E. (1997). Job satisfaction, application, assessment, causes and consequences (p. 30). London: ATOB.Google Scholar
  23. Žugaj, M. (1990). Znanstveno-istraživački rad mladih, Zbornik radova, Fakultet organizacije i informatike, Varaždin (str. 288).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EconomicsUniversity of SplitSplitCroatia
  2. 2.Faculty of EconomicsUniversity of ZenicaZenicaBosnia and Herzegovina

Personalised recommendations