A DICOM-Inspired Metadata Architecture for Managing Multimodal Acquisitions in Cultural Heritage
Quantitative and qualitative analyses of cultural heritage (CH) assets need to interconnect individual pieces of information, including a variety of multimodal acquisitions, to form a holistic compounded view of studied objects. The need for joint acquisition brings with it the requirement for defining a protocol to store, structure and support the interoperability of the multisource data. In our work, we are performing multiple imaging studies in order to analyze the material, to monitor the behavior and to diagnose the status of CH objects. In particular, we employ, in addition to coarse 3D scanning, two high-resolution surface data capture techniques: reflectance transformation imaging and microprofilometry. Given this multivariate input, we have defined a hierarchical data organization, similar to the one used in the medical field by the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) protocol, that supports pre-alignment of local patches with respect to a global model. Furthermore, we have developed two supporting tools for multimodal data handling: one for metadata annotation and another one for image registration. In this work, we illustrate our approach and discuss its practical application in a case study on a real CH object – a bronze bas-relief.
KeywordsMetadata Annotation tools 3D scanning Microprofilometry Reflectance transformation imaging
This work was partially supported by the Scan4Reco project funded by European Union’s Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation under grant agreement no 665091.
- 2.Pamart, A., Guillon, O., Vallet, J.-M., De Luca, L.: Toward a multimodal photogrammetric acquisition and processing methodology for monitoring conservation and restoration studies. In: Proceedings of the 14th Eurographics Workshop on Graphics and Cultural Heritage, pp. 207-210. Eurographics Association (2016)Google Scholar
- 3.Ronzino, P., Hermon, S., Niccolucci, F.: A metadata schema for cultural heritage documentation. In: Capellini, V. (ed.) Electronic Imaging & the Visual Arts: EVA, pp. 36–41 (2012)Google Scholar
- 4.Stasinopoulou, T., Bountouri, L., Kakali, C., Lourdi, I., Papatheodorou, C., Doerr, M., Gergatsoulis, M.: Ontology-based metadata integration in the cultural heritage domain. In: ICADL, pp. 165–175 (2007)Google Scholar
- 5.D’Andrea, A., Fernie, K.: CARARE 2.0: a metadata schema for 3D Cultural Objects. In: Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHeritage), vol. 2, pp. 137–143. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
- 6.Doerr, M., Theodoridou, M.: CRMdig: a generic digital provenance model for scientific observation. In: TaPP (2011)Google Scholar
- 7.Doerr, M., Gradmann, S., Hennicke, S., Isaac, A., Meghini, C., van de Sompel, H.: The Europeana data model (edm). In: World Library and Information Congress: 76th IFLA General Conference and Assembly, pp. 10–15 (2010)Google Scholar
- 9.Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine. http://dicom.nema.org/. Accessed 10 Mar 2017
- 10.ASTM E2339–15, Standard Practice for Digital Imaging and Communication in Nondestructive Evaluation (DICONDE). https://www.astm.org/Standards/E2339.htm. Accessed 10 Sep 2017
- 11.Scan4Reco project - Multimodal Scanning of Cultural Heritage Assets for their multilayered digitization and preventive conservation via spatiotemporal 4D Reconstruction and 3D Printing. http://scan4reco.eu/scan4reco/. Accessed 12 Sep 2017
- 12.Scan4Reco project deliverable on metadata: Protocol for joint acquisition of Low-res 3D, Microprofilometry and RTI. http://scan4reco.eu/scan4reco/sites/default/files/documents/scan4reco_d5.2_final.pdf. Accessed 12 Sep 2017
- 13.Cignoni, P., Callieri, M., Corsini, M., Dellepiane, M., Ganovelli, F., Ranzuglia, G.: Meshlab: an open-source mesh processing tool. In: Eurographics Italian Chapter Conference 2008, pp. 129–136 (2008)Google Scholar