Advertisement

Place-Based Policy-Making and Community Security: A Decision Support System for Integrated Planning of Urban Ecosystem Services and Disservices

  • Sandro Sacchelli
  • Sara Fabbrizzi
  • Francesco Geri
  • Marco Ciolli
Conference paper
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)

Abstract

The objective of the work is to implement a model based on Geographic Information System (GIS) to develop best-management strategies for urban trees. In the model, various objectives, such as the maximization of population security and the optimization of intervention on trees (i.e., economic improvement of Visual Tree Assessment and pruning operation), are considered. The Decision Support System (DSS) uses dynamic simulation able to take into account annual growth of single plants, as well as annual budgets devoted to green urban care by a local administration. The intervention priority concerning trees was based on a model that evaluates two opposing lines of services/disservices: the first is the potential value of single trees and green areas for recreational aspects based on a multicriteria approach to merge various indicators; the second is represented by the probability of falling trees and branches that can cause damage to people, vehicles and buildings, as well as other facilities. Cascine’s Park in the city of Florence (Italy) was selected as study area. Results highlight the priority of intervention over a period of five years and their spatial distribution. The main strengths, as well as the weaknesses of the model, are also addressed in the paper. In particular, economic and managerial benefits in case of DSS’ application are stressed.

Keywords

Urban green management Landscape perception Trade-off evaluation Complex system analysis Economic planning 

References

  1. Azmy, M. M., Hosaka, T., & Numata, S. (2016). Responses of four hornet species to levels of urban greenness in Nagoya city, Japan: Implications for ecosystem disservices of urban green spaces. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 18, 117–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyer, D. J., Roman, L. A., Henning, J. G., McFarland, M., Dentice, D., Low, S. C., et al. (2016). Data management for urban tree monitoring—Software requirements. Azavea, Philadelphia, PA. 124 p. Available online at http://azavea.com/research/urban-tree-monitoring/.
  3. Chen, S. J., & Hwang, C. L. (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coder, K. D. (1996). Tree growth rate table: Annual percentage growth. Accessed at: https://urbanforestrysouth.org/resources/library/citations/tree-growth-rate-table-annual-percentage-growth [07/10/2016].
  5. Conway, T. M., & Yip, V. (2016). Assessing residents’ reactions to urban forest disservices: A case study of a major storm event. Landscape and Urban Planning, 153, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Groot, R. S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., & Willemen, L. (2010). Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and goods indicators. Journal of Ecological Complexity, 7, 260–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dobbs, C., Escobedo, F., & Zipperer, W. (2011). A framework for developing urban forest ecosystem services and goods indicators. Landscape and Urban Planning, 99, 196–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Douglas, I. (2012). Urban ecology and urban ecosystems: Understanding the links to human health and well-being. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4, 385–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Escobedo, F. J., Kroeger, T., & Wagner, J. (2011). Urban forests and pollution mitigation: Analyzing ecosystems services and disservices. Environmental Pollution, 159, 2027–2087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Escobedo, F. J., Varela, S., Zhao, M., Wagner, J., & Zipperer, W. (2010). Analyzing the efficacy of subtropical urban forests in offsetting carbon emissions from cities. Environmental Science & Policy, 13(5), 362–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fagerholm, N., Käyhkö, N., Ndumbaro, F., & Khamis, M. (2012). Community stakeholders’ knowledge in landscape assessments-mapping indicators for landscape services. Ecological Indicators, 18, 421–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Florence Municipality. (2016). Open data of Florence municipality. Available online at: http://opendata.comune.fi.it/index.html.
  13. Frank, S., Waters, G., Beer, R., & May, P. (2006). An analysis of the street tree population of greater Melbourne at the beginning of the 21st century. Arboriculture and Urban Forestry, 32(4), 155–163.Google Scholar
  14. Fuller, R. A., Irvine, K. N., Devine-Wright, P., Warren, P. H., & Gaston, K. J. (2007). Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biology Letters, 3(4), 390–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gómez-Baggethun, E., & Barton, D. N. (2013). Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecological Economics, 86, 235–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Google. (2016). Street view service. Available online at: http://maps.google.it.
  17. Griggs, D., Stafford-Smith, M., Gaffney, O., Rockström, J., Ohman, M. C., Shymsundar, P., et al. (2013). Policy: sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature, 495, 305–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huang, F., Liu, D., Tan, X., Wang, J., & He, B. (2011). Explorations of the implementation of a parallel IDW interpolation algorithm in a Linux cluster-based parallel GIS. Computers & Geosciences, 37(4), 426–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kirnbauer, M. C., Kenney, W. A., Churchill, C. J., & Baetz, B. W. (2009). A prototype decision support system for sustainable urban tree planting programs. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 8, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kronenberg, J. (2015). Why not to green city? Institutional barriers to preventing urban ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 12, 218–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1–55.Google Scholar
  22. Lyytimӓki, J., & Sipilӓ, M. (2009). Hopping on one leg—The challenge of ecosystem disservices for urban green management. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 8, 309–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Malczewski, J. (2006). GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: A survey of the literature. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 20, 703–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well being: Current state and trends. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  25. Neteler, M., Bowman, M. H., Landa, M., & Metz, M. (2012). GRASS GIS: A multi-purpose open source GIS. Environmental Modelling and Software, 31, 124–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Radford, K. G., & James, P. (2012). Changes in the value of ecosystem services along a rural-urban gradient: A case study of Greater Manchester, UK. Landscape and Urban Planning, 109(1), 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Peterson, G. D., & Bennett, E. M. (2010). Ecosystem service bundles for analysing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(11), 5242–5247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Roy, S., Byrne, J., & Pickering, C. (2012). A systematic quantitative review of urban tree benefits, costs and assessment methods across cities in different climatic zones. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 11(4), 351–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sajdak, M., Velázquez-Martí, B., López-Cortés, I., Fernández-Sarría, A., & Estornell, J. (2014). Prediction models for estimating pruned biomass obtained from Platanus hispanica Münchh. Used for material surveys in urban forests. Renewable Energy, 66, 178–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Torabi Moghadam, S., Delmastro, C., Lombardi, P., & Corgnati, S. P. (2016). Towards a new integrated spatial decision support system in urban context. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 223, 974–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vogt, P., Oudenhoven, A. P. E., Petz, K., Alkemade, R., Hein, R., & de Groot, R. S. (2009). Mapping functional connectivity. Ecological Indicators, 9(1), 64–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Von Döhren, P., & Haase, D. (2015). Ecosystem disservices research: A review of the state of art with a focus on cities. Ecological Indicators, 52, 490–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandro Sacchelli
    • 1
  • Sara Fabbrizzi
    • 1
  • Francesco Geri
    • 2
  • Marco Ciolli
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Agricultural, Food and Forest Systems ManagementUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
  2. 2.Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of TrentoTrentoItaly

Personalised recommendations