Social Acceptance of Energy Retrofit in Social Housing: Beyond the Technological Viewpoint
Optimized energy systems are achieved by an increase in energy efficiency in parallel with energy savings. SINFONIA is an FP7 European-funded project that aims to implement smart initiatives for optimized energy systems through deep-energy retrofit of social housing buildings in middle-size European cities (i.e., Bolzano, Italy). From a technical viewpoint, the project’s main challenge is facing retrofit interventions in inhabited flats; from a social one, the challenge is engaging tenants in the project to achieve an effective decrease in energy consumption through a change in energy use, behaviors, and practices. The bridge between technical and social viewpoints is created thanks to an engagement process of tenants that has the support of some tools, such as the smart-energy meter. The involvement of tenants in engagement activities and smart-energy meter interaction must necessarily account for their characteristics as social actors. A thorough description and analysis of tenants’ characteristics is therefore one of the most important starting points in such a research project. The aim of our work is to support experts in the design of smart-energy meters providing them with a methodology for the description and analysis of tenants’ characteristics and social contexts. We perform a cluster analysis on the socio-demographic data of tenants involved in the Bolzano SINFONIA case study, identifying three relevant clusters according to family characteristics. Our future research will focus on the design of smart-energy meters and the development of participatory and learning activities addressed to SINFONIA tenants in order to ensure energy savings.
KeywordsSmart-energy meter Energy retrofit Social housing Cluster analysis Tenants’ profile
We are thankful to Dr. Petra Scudo (EURAC research), who edited the text of the present investigation.
Work described in this paper is funded by the SINFONIA project which has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development, and demonstration under grant agreement No. 609019. The European Union is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained in this document which is merely representing the authors’ view.
- Chirot, D. (1994). How Societies Change (pp. 184). Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
- COP22. (2016, November). Informal Consultation on the First Session of the Conference of the Parties Serving as the Meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement (CMA 1) and on Item 4 of the Agenda of COP22.Google Scholar
- European Community. (2009). Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. Official Journal of the European Union, 60.Google Scholar
- European Union. (2012). Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on Energy Efficiency, amending Directive 2009/125/EC and 2010/30/EU and repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC. Official Journal of the European Union, 56.Google Scholar
- Johansson, R. (2003). Case study methodology. In International Conference Methodologies in housing research. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology and International Association of People-Environment Studies.Google Scholar
- Rösch, C., Bräutigam, K., Kopfmüller, J., Stelzer, V., & Lichtner, P. (2017). Indicator system for the sustainability assessment of the German energy system and its transition. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 7, 13.Google Scholar
- Shove, E. (2003). Comfort, cleanliness and convenience: the social organization of normality (p. 240). Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
- Unfccc. (2015). Paris Agreement (22nd April 2016).Google Scholar
- Whitmarsh, L., O’Neill, S., & Lorenzoni, I. (2011). Engaging the public with climate change: Behaviour change and communication (p. 288). Routledge.Google Scholar