Advertisement

Issues with the Use of Spatially Variable Seismic Ground Motions in Engineering Applications

  • Aspasia ZervaEmail author
  • Mohammad Reza Falamarz-Sheikhabadi
  • Masoud Khazaei Poul
Chapter
Part of the Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering book series (GGEE, volume 46)

Abstract

Even though the significance of the spatial variability of seismic ground motions for the response of lifelines and its modeling from array data have been addressed for more than half a century, there are still issues associated with its use in engineering applications, which are the focus of the present paper. Common approaches for the simulation of spatially variable seismic ground motions are reviewed, and their corresponding uncertainties are discussed in detail. The importance of the consideration of rotational ground motions in the seismic excitation of structures, and the significance of the kinematic soil-structure interaction in the modification of the foundation input motions are addressed. In addition, difficulties with absorbing boundary conditions and one-dimensional deconvolution methods, when the spatial variability of the ground motions is considered in the seismic analysis of structures, are elaborated upon, and the necessity of developing three-dimensional coherency models is noted. This critical investigation provides insight into and facilitates the appropriate simulation of spatially variable seismic ground motions in engineering applications.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This investigation was supported in part by the U.S. National Science Foundation under Grants No. CMMI-0600262, CMMI-0900179 and CMMI-1129396. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed herein are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of the U.S. National Science Foundation.

References

  1. Abrahamson NA (1988) Spatial interpolation of array ground motions for engineering analysis. In: Proceedings of the ninth world conference on earthquake engineering, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  2. Abrahamson NA, (1993) Spatial variation of multiple support inputs. In: Proceedings of the first U.S. seminar on seismic evaluation and Retrofit of Steel Bridges. A Caltrans and University of California at Berkeley Seminar, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  3. Abrahamson NA (2007) Hard-rock coherency functions based on the Pinyon Flat array data, Draft report to EPRI. Electric Power Research Institute, Palo AltoGoogle Scholar
  4. Abrahamson NA, Schneider JF, Stepp JC (1991) Spatial coherency of shear waves from the Lotung, Taiwan large-scale seismic test. Struct Saf 10:145–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Akkar S, Bommer JJ (2006) Influence of long-period filter cut-off on elastic spectral displacements. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35:1145–1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Assimaki D, Kausel E, Gazetas G (2005) Soil-dependent topographic effects: a case study from the 1999 Athens earthquake. Earthq Spectra 21:929–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baker JW, Cornell CA (2006) Spectral shape, epsilon and record selection. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35:1077–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bard P-Y, Bouchon M (1985) The two-dimensional resonance of sediment-filled valleys. Bull Seismol Soc Am 75:519–541Google Scholar
  9. Basu D, Constantinou MC, Whittaker AS (2013) Extracting rotational components of earthquake ground motion using data recorded at multiple stations. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 42:451–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bérenger P (1994) A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic-waves. J Comput Phys 114(2):185–200MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bi K, Hao H (2011) Influence of irregular topography and random soil properties on coherency loss of spatial seismic ground motions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 40:1045–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bielak J, Loukakis K, Hisada Y, Yoshimura C (2003) Domain reduction method for three-dimensional earthquake modeling in localized regions, part I: theory. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93(2):817–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boissieres HP, Vanmarcke EH (1995) Estimation of lags for a seismograph array: wave propagation and composite correlation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 14:5–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bouckovalas GD, Papadimitriou AG (2005) Numerical evaluation of slope topography effects on seismic ground motion. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25:547–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bradley BA (2012) A ground motion selection algorithm based on the generalized conditional intensity measure approach. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 40:48–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chew WC, Weedon WH (1994) A 3d perfectly matched medium from modified maxwells equations with stretched coordinates. Microw Opt Technol Lett 7(13):599–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Deodatis G, Shinozuka M (1989) Simulation of seismic ground motion using stochastic waves. J Eng Mech 115:2723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Der Kiureghian A (1996) A coherency model for spatially varying ground motions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25:99–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Der Kiureghian A, Neuenhofer A (1992) Response spectrum method for multi-support seismic excitations. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 21:715–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance – Part 2: Bridges, BS EN 1998–2:2005, Brussels, Belgium (2005)Google Scholar
  21. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance – Part 5: Foundations, retaining structures and geotechnical aspects, BS EN 1998–5:2004, Brussels, Belgium (2004)Google Scholar
  22. Falamarz-Sheikhabadi MR, Ghafory-Ashtiany M (2012) Approximate formulas for rotational effects in earthquake engineering. J Seismol 16:815–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Falamarz-Sheikhabadi MR (2014) Simplified relations for the application of rotational components to seismic design codes. Eng Struct 69:141–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Falamarz-Sheikhabadi MR (2017) Excitation, model and analysis uncertainties in seismic assessment of bridges. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  25. Falamarz-Sheikhabadi MR, Ghafory-Ashtiany M (2015) Rotational components in structural loading. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 75:220–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Falamarz-Sheikhabadi MR, Zerva A (2017) Analytical seismic assessment of a tall long-span curved reinforced-concrete bridge. Part II: structural response. J Earthq Eng 21:1335.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2016.1211566 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Falamarz-Sheikhabadi MR, Zerva A, Ghafory-Ashtiany M (2016) Mean absolute input energy for in-plane vibrations of multiple-support structures subjected to horizontal and rocking components. J Probab Eng Mech 45:87–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Frankel A, Hough S, Friberg P, Busby R (1991) Observations of Loma Prieta aftershocks from a dense array in Sunnyvale, California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 00:1900–1922Google Scholar
  29. French Association for Earthquake Engineering (1995) Recommendations AFPS95 for the reduction of rules relative to the structures and installations built in regions prone to earthquakes, Saint-Remy-les-Chevreuse, FranceGoogle Scholar
  30. Gatmiri B, Pouneh M, Arson C (2009) Site-specific spectral response of seismic movement due to geometrical and geotechnical characteristics of sites. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29:51–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ghafory-Ashtiany M, Singh MP (1986) Structural response for six correlated earthquake components. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 14:103–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goldstein P, Archuleta RJ (1991) Deterministic frequency wave number methods and direct measurements of rupture propagation during earthquakes using a dense array: data analysis. J Geophys Res 96:6187–6198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Graizer V (2006) Tilts in strong ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96:2090–2102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hao H, Oliveira CS, Penzien J (1989) Multiple-station ground motion processing and simulation based on SMART-1 array data. Nucl Eng Des 111:293–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Harichandran RS, Vanmarcke EH (1986) Stochastic variation of earthquake ground motion in space and time. J Eng Mech 112:154–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Harichandran RS, Hawwari A, Sweidan BN (1996) Response of long-span bridges to spatially varying ground motion. J Struct Eng 122:476–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Imtiaz A, Cornou C, Bard P-Y, Zerva A (2017) Effects of site geometry on short-distance spatial coherency in Argostoli, Greece. Bull Earthq Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0270-z
  38. Johnson S (2010) Notes on perfectly matched layers. Technical report, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  39. Kamalian M, Jafari MK, Sohrabi-Bidar A, Razmkhah A (2008) Seismic response of 2-D semi-sine shaped hills to vertically propagating incident waves: amplification patterns and engineering applications. Earthq Spectra 24:405–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Khazaei Poul M, Zerva A (2018a) Efficient time-domain deconvolution of seismic ground motions using the equivalent-linear method, Soil Dyn Earthq Eng (under review)Google Scholar
  41. Khazaei Poul M, Zerva A (2018b) Nonlinear dynamic response of concrete gravity dams considering the deconvolution process. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng (under review)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kellezi L (2000) Local transmitting boundaries for transient elastic analysis. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 19(7):533–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kim S, Stewart JP (2003) Kinematic soil-structure interaction from strong motion recordings. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, ASCE 129:323–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kim JH, Rosowsky DV (2005) Fragility analysis for performance-based seismic design of engineered wood shearwalls. J Struct Eng ASCE 131:1764–1773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kolymbas D (2003) Advanced mathematical and computational geomechanics. Springer, New York cityCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  47. Kwon O-S, Elnashai A (2006) The effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability curves of RC structure. Eng Struct 28:289–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Luco JE (1986) On the relation between radiation and scattering problems for foundations embedded in an elastic half-space. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 5:97–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Liao S (2006) Physical characterization of ground motion spatial variation and conditional simulation for performance-based design. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  50. Liao S, Zerva A (2006) Physically-compliant, conditionally simulated spatially variable ground motions for performance-based design. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35:891–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Loh C H Penzien J (1984) Identification of wave types, directions, and velocities using SMART-1 strong motion array data. In: 8th world conference on earthquake engineering, San Francisco, pp 191–198Google Scholar
  52. Luco J, Wong H (1986) Response of a rigid foundation to a spatially random ground motion. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 14:891–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nenning M (2010) Infinite elements for elasto- and poroelastodynamicsMonographic Series TU GRAZ – Computation in Engineering and Science, Vol. 8, pp. 1-171, Verlag der Technischen Universität Graz. Google Scholar
  54. Niazi M (1986) Inferred displacements, velocities and rotations of a long rigid foundation located at el centro differential array site during the 1979 imperial valley, California, earthquake. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 14:531–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nigbor RL (1994) Six-degree-of-freedom ground-motion measurement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:1665–1669Google Scholar
  56. NEHRP (2015) Recommended seismic provisions for new buildings and other structures (FEMA P-1050-1). Building Seismic Safety Council, A council of the National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  57. Oliveira CS, Bolt BA (1989) Rotational components of surface strong ground motion. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 18:517–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA 356), Washington, DC (2000)Google Scholar
  59. Probabilistic Model Code, Joint Committee on Structural Safety, JCSS-OSTL/DIA/VROU-10-11-2000, (2001)Google Scholar
  60. Reimer RB (1973) Deconvolution of seismic response for linear systems. Ph.D. thesis, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  61. Rutenberg A, Heidebrecht AC (1985) Response spectra for torsion, rocking and rigid foundations. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 13:543–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Safak E (1999) Wave propagation formulation of seismic response of multi-story buildings. J Struct Eng 125:426–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schnabel PB. SHAKE a computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites. EERC report. 1972:72–12Google Scholar
  64. Spudich P (1994) Recent seismological insights into the spatial variation of earthquake ground motions, in new developments in earthquake ground motion estimation and implications for engineering design practice, ATC 35–1, Redwood City, CAGoogle Scholar
  65. Stephenson WR (2000) The dominant resonance response of parkway basin. In: Proceedings of 12thworld conference on earthquake engineering, Auckland, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  66. Suryanto W, Igel H, Wassermann J, Cochard A, Schuberth B, Vollmer D, Scherbaum F, Schreiber U, Velikoseltsev A (2006) First comparison of array-derived rotational ground motions with direct ring laser measurements. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96:2059–2071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Takeo M (1998) Ground rotational motions recorded in near-source region of earth-quakes. Geophys Res Lett 25:789–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Todorovska MI, Trifunac MD (1990) A note on excitation of long structures by ground waves. J Eng Mech Div ASCE 116:952–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Todorovska MI, Trifunac MD (1992) The system damping, the system frequency and the system response peak amplitudes during in-plane building-soil interaction. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 21:127–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Trifunac MD (1982) A note on rotational components of earthquake motions on ground surface for incident body waves. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 1:11–19Google Scholar
  71. Trifunac MD (2009) The role of strong motion rotations in the response of structures near earthquake faults. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29:382–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Uscinski BJ (1977) The elements of wave propagation in random media. McGraw-Hill International Book Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  73. Vanmarcke EH, Fenton GA (1991) Conditioned simulation of local fields of earthquake ground motion. Struct Saf 10:247–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Vanmarcke E, Heredia-Zavoni E, Fenton G (1993) Conditional simulation of spatially correlated earthquake ground motion. J Eng Mech 119:2333–2352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Veletsos AS, Prasad AM, Wu WH (1997) Transfer functions for rigid rectangular foundations. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 26:5–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wolf JP (1985) Dynamic soil structure interaction. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  77. Wong KKF, Harris JL (2012) Seismic damage and fragility analysis of structures with tuned mass dampers based on plastic energy. Struct Des Tall Special Build 21:296–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zembaty Z, Boffi G (1994) Effect of rotational seismic ground motion on dynamic response of slender towers. Eur Earthq Eng 1:3–11Google Scholar
  79. Zembaty Z, Rutenberg A (2002) Spatial response spectra and site amplification effects. Eng Struct 24:1485–1496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Zerva A (1990) Response of multi-span beams to spatially incoherent seismic ground motions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 19:819–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zerva A (2009) Spatial variation of seismic ground motions: modeling and engineering applications, advances in engineering. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zerva A, Stephenson WR (2011) Stochastic characteristics of seismic excitations at a non-uniform (rock and soil) site. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 31:1261–1284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zerva A, Zervas V (2002) Spatial variation of seismic ground motions: an overview. J Appl Mech Rev, ASME 55:271–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zerva A, Zhang O (1996) Estimation of signal characteristics in seismic ground motions. Probab Eng Mech 11:229–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zerva A, Morikawa H, Sawada S (2012) Criteria for processing response-spectrum-compatible seismic accelerations simulated via spectral representation. Earthq Struct 3:341–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zheng Y, Huang X (2002) Anisotropic perfectly matched layers for elastic waves in cartesian and curvilinear coordinates. MIT Earth Resources Laboratory, Consortium Report. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/67857
  87. Zienkiewicz OC, Emson C, Bettess P (1983) A novel boundary infinite element. Int J Numer Methods Eng 19:393–404MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aspasia Zerva
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mohammad Reza Falamarz-Sheikhabadi
    • 1
  • Masoud Khazaei Poul
    • 1
  1. 1.Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering DepartmentDrexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations