“What Do We Want? We Want Everything!”: Young Swedish Activists and the “Union of Citizens”

  • Ilaria Pitti
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter presents a case study conducted among the young people taking part in a Swedish social movement. The case study has been realised between 2016 and 2017 through participant observations and biographical interviews with the young activists and analyses the process of bottom-up politicisation of a neighbourhood through which the young activists are creating a “union of citizens”. The analysis of the collected data discusses how young activists seek to win back a power of self-definition and self-determination through a series of projects which, starting from the solution of a specific difficulty concerning the access to housing, entail big ambitions of societal transformation. In so doing, they attempt to abandon the role of “claimants” in relation to institutions.

Keywords

Social movements Sweden Youth participation Ethnography Housing 

References

  1. Andersson, Roger, Åsa Bråmå, and Emma Holmqvist. 2010. “Counteracting segregation: Swedish policies and experiences.” Housing Studies 25 (2):237–56.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030903561859.
  2. Barnes, Samuel H., and Max Kaase, eds. 1979. Political action. Mass participation in five Western democracies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Belfrage, Claes, and Magnus Ryner. 2009. “Renegotiating the Swedish social democratic settlement: from pension fund socialism to neoliberalization.” Politics & Society 37 (2):257–87.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329209333994.
  4. Bergmark, Åke, and Joakim Palme. 2003. “Welfare and the unemployment crisis: Sweden in the 1990s.” International Journal of Social Welfare 12 (2):108–22.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2397.00249.
  5. Christophers, Brett. 2013. “A monstrous hybrid: the political economy of housing in early twenty-first century Sweden”. New Political Economy 18 (6):885–911.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2012.753521.
  6. Eger, M. A. 2010. “Even in Sweden: the effect of migration on support for welfare state spending.” European Sociological Review 26 (2):203–17.  https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp017.
  7. Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Farthing, Rys. 2010. “The politics of youthful antipolitics: Representing the ‘issue’ of youth participation in politics.” Journal of Youth Studies 13 (2):181–95.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260903233696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hägred, Ulrika, and Lina Martinson. 2006. “A black market in housing. A problem in Swedish cities?”. Paper presented at the “Housing in an Expanding Europe: Theory, Policy, Participation and Implementation” Conference, 5–6 July, Ljubljana.Google Scholar
  10. Hedin, Karin, Eric Clark, Emma Lundholm, and Gunnar Malmberg. 2012. “Neoliberalization of housing in Sweden: Gentrification, filtering, and social polarization.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102 (2):443–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Housing in Europe Review. 2015. The state of housing in the EU 2015http://www.housingeurope.eu/resource-468/the-state-of-housing-in-the-eu-2015 [visited on 08.03.2018].
  12. Jämte, Jan. 2013. Antirasismens många ansikten. Umea: Umeå universitet, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-81637 [visited on 03.03.2018].
  13. Kuivalainen, Susan, and Kenneth Nelson. 2010. The nordic welfare model in a European perspective. Stockholm: Institutet för Famtidsstudier.Google Scholar
  14. Larsson, Bengt, Martin Letell, and Hakan Thorn. 2012. Transformations of the Swedish welfare state from social engineering to governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lind, Hans. 2014. “Social housing in Sweden” in Social housing in Europe, edited by Katheeln Scanlon, Christine Whitehead, and Melissa Arrigoitia. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Martuccelli, Danilo. 2015. “La partecipazione con riserva: al di qua del tema della critica.” Quaderni Di Teoria Sociale 1:11–34.Google Scholar
  17. Peterson, Abby. 2015. “Successful social movement outcomes without social movement? research on Swedish social movements and Swedish social movement research” In Social movements in Europe. The state of the art, edited by Olivier Fillieule and Guya Accornero. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  18. Peterson, Abby, Håkan Thörn and Mattias Wahlström. 2017. “Sweden 1950–2015. Contentious politics and social movements between confrontation and conditioned cooperation”. In Popular struggle and democracy in Scandinavia, edited by Flemming Mikkelsen, Knut Kjeldstadli and Stefan Nyzell. Bakingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Pontusson, Jonas. 2011. ‘Once again a model. Nordic social democracy in a globalised world’. In What’s left of the left: democrats and social democrats in challenging times, edited by James Cronin, George Ross, and James Shoch. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Scarpa, Simone. 2013. “The emergence of a Swedish underclass? welfare state restructuring, income inequality and residential segregation in Malmö, 1991–2008.” Economia & lavoro 2:121–138.  https://doi.org/10.7384/75273.
  21. Scarpa, Simone. 2015. “The impact of income inequality on economic residential segregation: the case of Malmö, 1991–2010.” Urban Studies 52 (5):906–22.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014529347.
  22. Scarpa, Simone, Carl-Ulrik Schierup, and Magnus Dahlstedt. 2016. “The end of the Swedish model? reconfigurations of welfare and citizenship in the new millennium.” In Social inequalities and migration: challenges to social work in the Swedish welfare state, edited by Sven Trygged, Erica Righard. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  23. Schierup, Carl-Ulrik, and Aleksandra Ålund. 2011. “The end of Swedish exceptionalism? citizenship, neoliberalism and the politics of exclusion.” Race & Class 53 (1):45–64.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396811406780.
  24. Schierup, Carl-Ulrik, and Simone Scarpa. 2017. How the Swedish model was (almost) lost. Migration, welfare and politics of solidarity. In Reimagineering the nation: crisis and social transformation in 21st century Sweden, edited by Carl-Ulrik Schierup, Aleksandra Ålund, and Anders Neergaard. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  25. Schierup, Carl-Ulrik, Aleksandra Ålund, and Lisa Kings. 2014. “Reading the Stockholm riots. A moment for social justice?” Race & Class 55 (3):1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396813509191.
  26. Schierup, Carl-Ulrik, Aleksandra Ålund, and Anders Neergaard. 2017. “Race and the upsurge of antagonistic popular movements in Sweden.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 2:1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1361541.
  27. Sernhede, Ove, Catharina Thörn, and Håkan Thörn. 2016. “The Stockholm uprising in context: urban social movements and the rise and demise of the Swedish welfare state city.” In Urban uprisings: challenging neoliberal urbanism in Europe edited by In Margit Mayer, Catharina Thörn, and Håkan Thörn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. Torgersen, Ulf. 1987. “Housing: the wobbly pillar under the welfare state.” Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research 4 (1):116–26.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02815737.1987.10801428.
  29. Wannerhag, Magnus, Christian Frölich and Grzegorz Pioteowski. 2017. Radical left movements in Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ilaria Pitti
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Humanities, Education and Social SciencesÖrebro UniversityÖrebroSweden

Personalised recommendations