Advertisement

New Frames: A Pastiche of Theoretical Approaches to Examine African American and Diasporic Communication

  • Gracie Lawson-Borders
Chapter

Abstract

African American and Blacks across the African Diaspora have a rich history of communication strategies. Scholars sometimes face challenges in attempts to examine African American and African Diasporic communication through the lens of existing theoretical foundations. Some of the approaches used to examine communication phenomenon have included Afrocentricity, critical race theory, critical cultural studies, or social cognitive theory as application to communication processes across the African Diaspora. In this chapter, I examine a synthesis of existing theoretical approaches that could chart a path to gain a better understanding of communication strategies for African Americans and across the African Diaspora. I borrow from the French term pastiche to examine how the use of existing theoretical work can create an expansive palette for addressing communication issues. The theoretical approaches listed are used because they are grounded in different disciplines such as legal studies, African American studies, communication, psychology, and cultural studies, but are interdisciplinary in nature and often used across disciplines during scholarly inquiry. My argument is based on—the pastiche—the blending of scholarly work, which offers the opportunity and possibility to analyze communication messages that occur in a multiplicity of settings with an array of cultural influences.

References

  1. About tmz.com. (n.d.). About tmz.com. Retrieved from https://www.tmz.com/page/about/.
  2. Aitken, S. C., & Zonn, L. E. (1994). Place, Power, Situation and Spectacle: A Geography of Film. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Asante, M. K. (2003). The Afrocentric Idea. In A. Mazama (Ed.), The Afrocentric Paradigm (pp. 37–53). Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1976). Social Learning Theory. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1989). Social Cognitive Theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of Child Development: Vol. 6. Six Theories of Child Development (pp. 1–60). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bandura, A. (1991). Human Agency: The Rhetoric and the Reality. American Psychologist, 46(2), 157–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  9. Bandura, A. (2002). Social Cognitive Theory in Cultural Context. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51(2), 269–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Canclini, N. G. (2000). The State of War and the State of Hybridization. In P. Gilroy, L. Grossberg, & A. McRobbie (Eds.), Without Guarantees: In Honour of Stuart Hall. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  11. Carpenter Ford, A. (2013). “Verbal Ping Pong” as Culturally Congruent Communication: Maximizing African American Students’ Access and Engagement as Socially Just Teaching. Equity & Excellence in Education, 46(3), 371–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carter, P. L. (2003). “Black” Cultural Capital, Status Positioning, and Schooling Conflicts for Low-Income African American Youth. Social Problems, 50(1), 136–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Corcoran, K. J. (1991). Efficacy, “Skills,” Reinforcement, and Choice Behavior. American Psychologist, 46(2), 155–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Danesi, M. (2015). Popular Culture: Introductory Perspectives (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  15. D’Souza, M. O. (1996). Educational Pastiche Versus the Education of Natural Intelligence and the Intellectual Virtues According to Jacques Maritain. Educational Theory, 46(4), 501–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (2017). Critical Race Theory: An Introduction (3rd ed.). New York: York University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Ditlmann, R. K., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Dovidio, J. F., & Naft, M. J. (2017). The Implicit Power Motive in Intergroup Dialogues About the History of Slavery. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(1), 116–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fodor, E. M. (2009). Power Motivation. In O. C. Schultheiss & J. C. Brunstein (Eds.), Implicit Motives (pp. 3–29). New York, NY: Oxford University Press Inc.Google Scholar
  19. Gilroy, P., Grossberg, L., & McRobbie, A. (Eds.). (2000). Without Guarantees: In Honour of Stuart Hall. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  20. Griffin, E. (2003). A First Look at Communication Theory (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  21. Harrison, A. W., Rainer, R. K., Hochwarter, W. A., & Thompson, K. R. (1997). Testing the Self-Efficacy—Performance Linkage of Social—Cognitive Theory. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137(1), 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoesterey, I. (1995). Postmodern Pastiche: A Critical Aesthetic. The Centennial Review, 39(3), 493–510.Google Scholar
  23. Houston, M. (2002). Seeking Difference: African Americans in Interpersonal Communication Research, 1975–2000. Howard Journal of Communications, 13(1), 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Howard, T. C., & Navarro, O. (2016). Critical Race Theory 20 years Later: Where Do We Go from Here? Urban Education, 51(3), 253–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Howe, S. (1999). Molefi Asante: Godfather of Afrocentrism in Afrocentrism: Mythical Pasts and Imagined Homes. In S. Howe (Ed.), Afrocentrism: Mythical Pasts and Imagined Homes. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  26. Hurst, M. (n.d.). Albert Bandura: Social-Cognitive Theory and Vicarious Learning. Retrieved from http://study.com/academy/lesson/albert-bandura-social-cognitive-theory-and-vicarious-learning.html.
  27. Jackson, R. L., & Givens, S. M. B. (2006). Black Pioneers in Communication Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ladson-Billings, G., & Tate, W. (1995). Toward a Critical Race Theory of Education. Teachers College Record, 97, 47–68.Google Scholar
  29. Roberts, G., & Klibanoff, H. (2006). The Race Beat. The Press, the Civil Rights Struggle, and the Awakening of a Nation. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  30. Rottschaefer, W. A. (1991). Some Philosophical Implications of Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory of Human Agency. American Psychologist, 46(2), 153–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Social Cognitive Theory, Explanation of Behavioral Patterns. (2017, February 27). University of Twente. Retrieved from https://www.utwente.nl/en/bms/communication-theories/sorted-by-cluster/Health%20Communication/Social_cognitive_theory/.
  32. Stovall, D. (2016). Out of Adolescence and Into Adulthood: Critical Race Theory, Retrenchment, and the Imperative of Praxis. Urban Education, 51(3), 274–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. The Staff of the Chicago Tribune. (1988). Chicago Schools: “Worst in America”. Chicago, IL: The Chicago Tribune.Google Scholar
  34. Van Swol, L. M., & Carlson, C. L. (2017). Language Use and Influence Among Minority, Majority, and Homogeneous Group Members. Communication Research, 44(4), 512–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Williams, J. E., & Garza, L. (2006). A Case Study in Change and Conflict. Urban Education, 41(5), 459–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wilson, C. (2014). Whither the Black Press? Glorious Past, Uncertain Future. Bloomington, IN: Xlibris, LLC.Google Scholar
  37. Yosso, J. J. (2005). Whose Culture Has Capital? A Critical Race Theor Discussion of Community Cultural Wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gracie Lawson-Borders
    • 1
  1. 1.Cathy Hughes School of CommunicationsHoward UniversityWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations