Advertisement

Between Art, Society, Representation, and Subjectivity: Wojtek Ziemilski’s Prolog

  • Anna R. Burzyńska
Chapter
Part of the Avant-Gardes in Performance book series (AGP)

Abstract

Wojtek Ziemilski is one of the most important contemporary Polish artists, whose main interest is the relationship network between the theatre, media, and society. In Prolog [Prologue] (2011), Ziemilski uses the mechanisms of Real Time Composition and devising theatre to explore the possibilities of social choreography in the age of omnipresent, interactive media and political crisis. The chapter describes how Ziemilski’s unusual performance contributed to the development of modern political theatre in Poland—theatre that can transform the awareness of spectators, activate, provoke, and emancipate them. Ziemilski’s performance is similar to a video game in which the people practice useful decision-making, analogous to real political life.

References

  1. Auslander, Philip. 2008. Liveness: Performance in a Mediatized Culture. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Borowski, Mateusz, and Małgorzata Sugiera. 2012. Konszachty z medialnością. Didaskalia 107: 35–42.Google Scholar
  3. Burzyńska, Anna R. 2011. Foyer rzeczywistości. Didaskalia 106: 78–80.Google Scholar
  4. Handke, Peter. 2002 [1966]. Offending the Audience. In Contemporary German Plays II, trans. Michael Roloff, 23–50. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  5. Hewitt, Andrew. 2005. Social Choreography: Ideology as Performance in Dance and Everyday Movement. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Laurel, Brenda. 1993. Computers as Theatre. Reading: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  8. Lepecki, André. 2006. Exhausting Dance: Performance and the Politics of Movement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Martin, Randy. 1998. Critical Moves: Dance Studies in Theory and Politics. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Mirek, Macias, Puś Bartek, and Wojtek Ziemilski. 2012. Medium czy gadżet? Wideo w teatrze. Interview by Mateusz Borowski and Małgorzata Sugiera. Didaskalia 107: 42–49.Google Scholar
  11. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1979 [1758]. Letter to d’Alembert on Spectacles. In Reveries of the Solitary Walker, trans. Peter France. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  12. Sajewska, Dorota. 2012. Pod okupacją mediów. Warszawa: Instytut Wydawniczy Książka i Prasa.Google Scholar
  13. Sowa, Jan. 2016. It’s Political Economy, Stupid! Towards Progressive Modes of Participation. In Joined Forces: Audience Participation in Theatre, ed. Anna R. Burzyńska, 14–33. Berlin: Alexander Verlag.Google Scholar
  14. Weber, Samuel. 2004. Theatricality as Medium. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wojtek Ziemilski: Prolog. 2012. Ruhrtriennale Festival. Accessed 1 November 2016. http://archiv.ruhrtriennale.de/www.2012.ruhrtriennale.de/en/programm1/produktionen/prolog/index.html
  16. Ziemilski, Wojtek. 2011. Prolog. Unpublished Playscript.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 2012. Mainstreamów jest mnóstwo. Interview by Arek Gruszczyński. Dwutygodnik 85, June. Accessed 19 September 2017. http://www.dwutygodnik.com/artykul/3722-mainstreamow-jest-mnostwo.html
  18. Žižek, Slavoj. 2013. The Year of Dreaming Dangerously. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna R. Burzyńska
    • 1
  1. 1.Jagiellonian UniversityKrakówPoland

Personalised recommendations