International River Basins as Regional Security Communities: The Okavango River Case

Chapter

Abstract

Due to the uneven water distribution around the world, population growth, high pressure over economic output (mostly food production) and an increasing number of sources of pollution, the use of water in international river basins will be under stress in the near future. However, why we won’t observe a crescent number of acute conflicts or wars? It is the opposite; States in the presence of water scarcity tend to engage into cooperative behavior embracing principles such as equitable and rational use to mention a few, but why? This chapter takes an interdisciplinary framework comprised by international law and theory of international relations and a constructivist approach for analyzing the quality of cooperation over transboundary water. The argument of the chapter is that the increasing sophistication in cooperation process over shared water produces important implications to international security in the river basins, thus, reaching the point of the formation of regional water security communities. At empirical level, the chapter presents evidences of the existence of a water security community in the Okavango River Basin, which demonstrates that even in challenging political and physical environments, as in the case of Sub-Saharan Africa, it is possible to achieve a high level of cooperation and institutional design that includes principles of governance and peaceful conflict resolution.

Keywords

Water scarcity Cooperation Security communities Okavango River Basin 

References

  1. Adler, Emanuel. 1997. Imagined (Security) Communities: Cognitive Regions in International Relations. Millennium—Journal of International Studies 26 (2 June 1): 249–277.  https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298970260021101.
  2. Adler, Emanuel, and Michael Barnett, (eds.). 1998. Security Communities. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Alao, Abiodun. 2015. Natural Resources and Conflict in Africa: The Tragedy of Endowment (Reissue Edition). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
  4. AMCOW. 2012. Status Report on the Application of Integrated Approaches to Water Resources Management in Africa.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, Mary. 2010. Community Identity and Political Behavior. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Axelrod, Robert. 2006. The Evolution of Cooperation (Revised Edition). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  7. Barlow, Maude. 2009. Blue Covenant: The Global Water Crisis and the Coming Battle for the Right to Water (Edição: Reprint). New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  8. Barnett, Michael, and Martha Finnemore. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bernauer, Thomas, Tobias Böhmelt, and Vally Koubi. 2012. Environmental Changes and Violent Conflict. Environmental Research Letters 7 (1): 015601.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/015601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Black, Maggie, Jannet King, and Candida Lacey. 2009 The Atlas of Water: Mapping the World’s Most Critical Resource, 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, Lester R. 2006. Plan B 2.0: Rescuing a Planet Under Stress and a Civilization in Trouble (Exp. Upd. Edition). New York and London: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  12. Buzan, Barry, Ole Weaver, and Jaap Wilde. 1997. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  13. Clapp, Jennifer, and Marc J. Cohen, eds. 2009. Global Food Crisis: Governance Challenges and Opportunities. Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Deegan, Heather. 2008. Africa Today: Culture, Economics, Religion, Security. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Delappenna, Joseph, and Joyeeta Gupta. 2009. The Evolution of the Law and Politics of Water. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Deutsch, Karl W., Sidney A. Burrell, Robert A. Kann, and Maurice Lee Jr. 1957. Political Community and the North Atlantic Area. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. FAO, IFAD, and WFP. 2015. The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2015. Meeting the 2015 International Hunger Targets: Taking Stock of Uneven Progress. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  18. George, Alexander, and Andrew Benett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (Fourth Printing Edition). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Gleditsch, Nils Petter. 1998. Armed Conflict and The Environment: A Critique of the Literature. Journal of Peace Research 35 (3 May 1): 381–400.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343398035003007.
  20. Gleick, Peter H. 1993a. Water in Crisis: A Guide to the World’s Fresh Water Resources, 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Gleick, Peter H. 1993b. Water and Conflict: Fresh Water Resources and International Security. International Security 18 (1): 79–112.Google Scholar
  22. Graeger, Nina. 1996. Environmental Security? Journal of Peace Research 33 (1 February): 111.Google Scholar
  23. Homer-Dixon, Thomas. 2001. Environment, Scarcity, and Violence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Jervis, Robert. 1978. Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma. World Politics 30 (2): 167–214.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2009958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Just, R.E. 2002. Conflict Prevention and Resolution in Water Systems (Illustrated Edition). Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Keohane, Robert, and Joseph Nye. 2011. Power and Interdependence, 4th ed. Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  27. Kiss, A., and D Shelton. 2007. Guide to International Environmental Law, 1st ed. Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  28. Lipschutz, Ronnie D. (ed.). 1995. On Security. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lowi, Miriam R. 1995. Water and Power: The Politics of a Scarce Resource in the Jordan River Basin. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Mathews, Jessica Tuchman. 1989. Redefining Security. Foreign Affairs 68 (2 Spring): 162–177.Google Scholar
  31. McBride, Keally D. 2006. Collective Dreams: Political Imagination and Community. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
  32. McCaffrey, Stephen C. 2007. The Law of International Watercourses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Nathan, Laurie. 2004. Security Communities and the Problem of Domestic Instability. Working Paper No. 55, Crisis States Research Centre, London.Google Scholar
  34. OKACOM. Relatório de Análise Diagnóstica Transfronteiriça Da Bacia Hidrográfica Do Cubango-Okavango: Permanente Das Águas Da Bacia Hidrográfica Do Rio Okavango Comissão—The Permanent Okavango River Basin Water Commission | OKACOM | Commissão Permanente Das Águas de Bacia Hidrografica Do Rio Okavango. Accessed 28 Mar 2016. http://www.okacom.org/site-documents/tda-final-reports/relatorio-de-analise-diagnostica-transfronteirica-da-bacia-hidrografica-do-cubango-okavango-permanente-das-aguas-da-bacia-hidrografica-do-rio-okavango-comissao/view.
  35. Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pachova, Nevelina I., Mikiyasu Nakayama, and Libor Jansky (eds.). 2008. International Water Security: Domestic Threats and Opportunities. Tokyo and New York: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  37. SADC. 2000. Protocol on Shared Watercourses in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) 1995 (revised 2000). http://www.orangesenqurak.org/UserFiles/File/SADC/SADCprotocol_Revised.PDF.
  38. Salman, Salman M.A. 2007. The Helsinki Rules, the UN Watercourses Convention and the Berlin Rules: Perspectives on International Water Law. Water Resources Development 23 (4 December): 625–640.Google Scholar
  39. Scudder, T. 1993. The IUCN Review of the Southern Okavango Integrated Water Development Project, 1st ed. Gland, Switzerland: Union Internationale pour la Conservation de la Nature et de ses Ressources.Google Scholar
  40. Seawright, Jason, and John Gerring. 2008. Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly 61 (2 June 1): 294–308.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907313077.
  41. Sheehan, Michael. 2005. International Security: An Analytical Survey. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  42. Shiva, Vandana. 2002. Water Wars: Privatization, Pollution and Profit. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  43. Soares, Guido Fernando Silva. 2003. Direito internacional do meio ambiente: emergência, obrigações e responsabilidades. São Paulo: Atlas.Google Scholar
  44. Swatuk, Larry A. 2005. Political Challenges to Implementing IWRM in Southern Africa. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) and the Millennium Development Goals: Managing Water for Peace and Prosperity 30 (11–16): 872–880.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2005.08.033.
  45. Trottier, Julie. 2001. Water Wars: The Rise of a Hegemonic Concept. In Exploring the Making of the Water War and Water Peace Belief Within the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict. Paris: UNESCO International Hydrological Programme. http://armspark.msem.univ-montp2.fr/bfpvolta/admin/biblio/Trottier.pdf.
  46. Turton, A.R. 2002. Hydropolitics: The Concept and Its Limitations. In Hydropolitics in the Developing World—A Southern African Perspective, ed. Turton, A.R. and Henwood, R. Pretoria: African Water Issue Research Unit.Google Scholar
  47. Turton, Anthony, Peter Ashton, and Eugene Cloete, eds. 2003. Transboundary Rivers, Sovereignty and Development: Hydropolitical Drivers in the Okavango River Basin. Pretoria, South Africa and Geneva: African Water Issues Research Unit.Google Scholar
  48. Turshen, Meredeth. 2016. Gender and the Political Economy of Conflict in Africa: The Persistence of Violence. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Tusicisny, Andrej. 2007. Security Communities and Their Values: Taking Masses Seriously. International Political Science Review 28 (4 September 1): 425–449.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512107079639.
  50. Ullman, Richard H. 1983. Redefining Security. International Security 8 (1): 129–153.Google Scholar
  51. UN-Water. 2013. Water Security & the Global Water Agenda: A UN-Water Analytical Brief. Hamilton, ON: UN University.Google Scholar
  52. United Nations. 2006. Water a Shared Responsibility: The United Nations World Water Development Report 2. Paris, France and New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  53. Villa, Rafael Antonio Duarte. 1999. Da Crise do Realismo à Segurança Global Multidimensional. São Paulo: Annabllume, 146.Google Scholar
  54. Visentini, Paulo Fagundes. 2002. As revoluções Africanas. São Paulo: UNESP.Google Scholar
  55. Gulbenkian Think Tank on Water and the Future of Humanity. 2013. Water and the Future of Humanity: Revisiting Water Security. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  56. Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Whitaker, Paul M. 1970. The Revolutions of “Portuguese” Africa. The Journal of Modern African Studies 8 (1): 15–35.Google Scholar
  58. Wolf, Aaron T. 1998. Conflict and Cooperation along International Waterways. Water Policy 1 (2): 251–265.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.São Paulo School of Law (FGV)São PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations