Skip to main content

Exploring the Contributing Factors Associated with Intelligence Failures During the Cold War

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Technology and the Intelligence Community
  • 749 Accesses

Abstract

The goal of this chapter is to assess “intelligence failures,” as defined by existing literature, in order to determine whether the failures can be attributed (at least in part) to a failure or inadequate use of technical-based or non-technical based intelligence gathering methods. Two case studies are considered in this analysis: the placement of Soviet missiles in Cuba in 1962 and the collapse of the Soviet Union. The results of the analysis conclude that while there are some technology-based intelligence failures evident in each case study, the bulk of the failure can be linked to an oversight or misuse of non-technical intelligence gathering methods. However, most striking is the pre-existing notions within the United States intelligence community that can be linked to how and why the community overlooked critical human, cultural, economic, and ethnic-based intelligence. Therefore, the analysis concludes with the suggestion that the two case studies are considered “intelligence failures” due to the internal failures of the intelligence community. Biases and pressure to deliver conclusions according to the political administration’s preferences continue to impact the analyses coming from the US intelligence community. How the US intelligence community should address this failure remains unclear and requires future research that would be strengthened by the inclusion of additional case studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Betts, R. K. (1978). Analysis, war, and decision: Why intelligence failures are inevitable. World Politics, 31(1), 61–89. Web.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coles, J. (2006). Incorporating cultural intelligence into joint doctrine. Joint Information Operations Center, 1–13. http://www.au.af.mil/info-ops/iosphere/iosphere_spring06_coles.pdf

  • Collier, D. (2011). Understanding process tracing. Political Science and Politics., 44(4), 823–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (1995). Prediction in macrosociology: The case of the soviet collapse. American Journal of Sociology, 100(6), 1552–1593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. (2008). The CIA and the culture of failure: US intelligence from the end of the cold war to the invasion of Iraq (pp. 19–45). Stanford: Stanford Security Series. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garicano, L., & R. A. Posner. (2005). Intelligence Failures: An Organizational Economic Perspective. Working paper no. 5186. London: Center for Economic Policy Research. Discussion Paper Series. Industrial Organization and Public Policy, 6. <www.cepr.org/pubs/dps/DP5186.asp>.

  • Hopf, T., & Gaddis, J. L. (1993). Getting the end of the cold war wrong. International Security, 18(2), 202–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, R. (2008). Of knowledge and power: The complexities of National Intelligence. Praeger Security International. 8–9. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr, K. (1964). Failures in National Intelligence Estimates: The case of the Cuban missiles. World Politics, 16(3), 455–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzi, F. (2006). Networks: Terra incognita and the case for ethnographic intelligence. Military Review (September–October) (pp. 16–22).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1997). “The psychology of administrative decisions.” Administrative Behavior. Ch. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • The National Security Archive. (2008). “National Security Agency releases history of cold war intelligence activities.” National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 260. http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB260/

  • Westad, O. A. (2000). The new international history of the cold war: Three (possible) paradigms. Diplomatic History, 24(4), 551–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jenna K. McGrath .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McGrath, J.K. (2018). Exploring the Contributing Factors Associated with Intelligence Failures During the Cold War. In: Kosal, M. (eds) Technology and the Intelligence Community. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75232-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics