Advertisement

Rural Development and Food Diversity in France

  • Séverin Jean
Chapter
Part of the LITES - Legal Issues in Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies book series (LITES, volume 2)

Abstract

In France today, there can be no rural development without food diversity, just as there is no food diversity without rural development. Food diversity through rural development is best illustrated by labels of quality and origin. In this way, we can see that food diversity is promoted by policies for rural development. Nonetheless, food diversity is sometimes hindered by rural development policy. A good example would be regulations concerning seed and seedlings, which can only be marketed after registration in the official catalogue. However, the criteria for registration exclude de facto certain types of seed, particularly those from seed saving practices, which leads to a decrease in food diversity. On closer examination, rural development promotes food diversity as much as it hinders it. In contrast, food diversity helps foster rural development. Producers try to both consolidate structurally and to become involved in every step of the marketing of their produce. Their aim is quite simple: to remove distribution intermediaries as much as possible by developing closer links to the end consumer.

Keywords

Rural development Food diversity Labels of quality and origin Seed Producer groups Short supply channels Association for the maintenance of small-scale farming 

References

  1. AMAP Charter. (associations for the preservation of smallholdings), http://www.reseau-amap.org/docs/chartedesamap.PDF
  2. Aubin-Brouté RJ (2013) Le contrat en agriculture, Contribution à l’étude du contrat comme instrument de l’action publique. LGDJ, ParisGoogle Scholar
  3. Couturier I (1994) La diversification en agriculture. L’Harmattan, ParisGoogle Scholar
  4. Regional rural development programme for Midi-Pyrénées, http://www.midipyrenees.fr/IMG/pdf/pdrr_complet.pdf
  5. Krajeski D (2009) Droit rural. Defresnois, ParisGoogle Scholar
  6. Les maisons des semences paysannes (2014) Regards sur la gestion collective de la biodiversité cultivée en France. Paysannes, Réseau SemencesGoogle Scholar
  7. Mangin P (2012) L’entreprise coopérative: un modèle anti-crise. Le Monde, ParisGoogle Scholar
  8. Morize J (1992) Manuel pratique de vulgarisation agricole. Maisonneuve et Larose, ParisGoogle Scholar
  9. Report “Short supply channels and marketing” (2009) http://agriculture.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/rapport_du_gt_circuits_courts0409.pdf
  10. Research Centre for the Study and Observation of Living Conditions (CREDOC) (2012) Research report, Market survey 2012, Behaviours and attitudes of consumers concerning food retailGoogle Scholar
  11. Vialle P (2011) Semences et agriculture durable. Report for the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Rural life and Local AffairsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Séverin Jean
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Judicial Studies for Urban Planning and Construction (IEJUC)Toulouse 1 Capitole UniversityToulouseFrance

Personalised recommendations