Advertisement

Anatomy and Physiology of Skeletal Tissue: The Bone Cells

  • Giacomina Brunetti
  • Graziana Colaianni
  • Silvia Colucci
  • Maria Grano
Chapter

Abstract

The human skeleton, consisting of several hundreds of bones, is no longer believed as a static structural system protecting all soft tissues, but it is now thought as a highly dynamic system. In addition to its roles in locomotion, storage of minerals, and production of blood cells, the skeleton has recently been considered as a new endocrine organ, not only able in its regulation but also involved in the regulation of other organs, and, importantly, it plays a crucial role in the cross talk with the immune system and the skeletal muscle. Bone tissue is a metabolically active organ undergoing continuous remodeling through the balanced activity of osteoclasts, the bone-resorbing cells, and osteoblasts, the bone-forming cells, both orchestrated by the osteocytes, the most abundant cells embedded into the bone matrix. Here, we will provide an overview of the cytokines involved in the recent mechanisms highlighting bone cell differentiation and function.

Keywords

Osteoclasts Osteoblasts Osteocytes 

References

  1. 1.
    Cappariello A, Ponzetti M, Rucci N. The “soft” side of the bone: unveiling its endocrine functions. Horm Mol Biol Clin Invest. 2016;28(1):5–20.  https://doi.org/10.1515/hmbci-2016-0009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Novack DV, Mbalaviele G. Osteoclasts-key players in skeletal health and disease. Microbiol Spectr. 2016;4(3).  https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.MCHD-0011-2015.
  3. 3.
    Takahashi N, Akatsu Y, Udawa N, et al. Osteoblastic cells are involved in osteoclast formation. Endocrinology. 1988;123:2600–2.  https://doi.org/10.1210/endo-123-5-2600.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Udafawa N, Takahashi N, Akatsu T, et al. Origin of osteoclasts: mature monocytes and macrophages are capable of differentiating into osteoclasts under a suitable microenviroment prepared by bone marrow-derived stromal cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:7260–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stanley ER, Chitu V. CSF-1 receptor signalling in myeloid cells. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014;6:a021857.  https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a021857.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Glantschnig H, Fisher JE, Wsolowski G, et al. M-CSF, TNFa and RANK ligand promote osteoclast survival by signalling hrough mTOR/S6 kinase. Cell Death Differ. 2003;10:1165–77.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4401285.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zamani A, Decker C, Cremasco V, et al. Diacylglycerol kinase ζ (DGKζ) is a critical regulator of bone homeostasis via modulation of c-Fos levels in osteoclasts. J Bone Miner Res. 2015;30:1852–63.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2533.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li J, Chen L, Zhu L, Pollard JW. Conditional deletion of the colony stimulating factor-1 receptor (c-fms proto-oncogene) in mice. Genesis. 2006;44:328–35.  https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.20219.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen Z, Buki K, Vaananen HK. The critical role of IL-34 in osteoclastogenesis. PLoS One. 2011;6:e18689.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018689.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kong YY, Yoshida H, Sarosi I, et al. OPGL is a key regulator of osteoclastogenesis, lymphocyte development and lymph-node organogenesis. Nature. 1999;397:315–23.  https://doi.org/10.1038/16852.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bucay N, Sarosi I, Duncstan CR, et al. Osteoprotegerin-deficient mice develop eartly onset osteoporosis and arterial calcification. Genes Dev. 1998;12:1260–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Whyte MP, Tau C, McAlister W, et al. Juvenile Paget’s disease with heterozygous duplication within TNFRSF11A encoding RANKL. Bone. 2014;68:153–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2014.07.019.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brunetti G, Marzano F, Colucci S, Ventura A, et al. Genotype-phenotype correlation in juvenile paget disease: role of molecular alterations of the TNFRSF11B gene. Endocrine. 2012;42(2):266–71.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-012-9705-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hughes AE, Ralston SH, Marken J, et al. Mutations in TNFRSF11A, affectiong the signal peptide of RANK, cause familial expansile osteolysis. Nat Genet. 2000;24:45–8.  https://doi.org/10.1038/71667.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Novack DV, Teitelbaum SL. The osteoclast: friend or foe? Annu Rev Pathol. 2008;3:457–84.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pathmechdis.3.121806.151431.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smink JJ, Bégay V, Schoenmaker T, et al. Transcription facton C/EBPb isoform ratio regulates osteoclastogenesis through MafB. EMBO J. 2009;28:1769–81.  https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2009.127.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Takayanagi H, Kim S, Koga T, et al. Induction and activation of the transcription factor NFATc1 (NFAT2) instegrate RANKL signalling in terminal differentiation of osteoclasts. Dev Cell. 2002;3:889–901.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00369-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Alhawagri M, Yamanaka Y, Ballard D, et al. Lysine392, a K63-linked ubiquination site in NEMO mediates inglammatory osteoclastogenesis and osteolysis. J Orthop Res. 2012;30:554–60.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.21555.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mao D, Epple H, Uthgenannt B, et al. PLCy2 regulates osteoclastogenesis via its interaction with ITAM proteins and GAB2. J Clin Invest. 2006;116:2869–79.  https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI28775.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bronisz A, Carey HA, Godlewski J, et al. The multifunctional protein fusd in sarcoma (FUS) is a coactivator of microphtalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF). J Biol Chem. 2014;289:326–34.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.493874.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yasui T, Hirose J, Aburatani H, et al. Epigenetic regulation of osteoclast differentiation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011;1240:7–13.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06245.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kim JH, Kim N. Reguation of NFATc1 in osteoclast differentiation. J Bone Metab. 2014;21:233–41.  https://doi.org/10.11005/jbm.2014.21.4.233.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mizoguchi F, Izu Y, Hayata T, et al. Osteoclast-specific Dicer gene deficiency suppresses osteoclastic bone resorption. J Cell Biochem. 2010;109:866–75.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.22228.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yasui T, Hirose J, Tsutsumi S, et al. Epigenetic regulation of osteoclast differentiation: possible involvement of Jmjd3 in the histone demethylation of Nfact1. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26:2665–71.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.464.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Luo J, Yang Z, Ma Y, et al. LGR4 is a receptor for RANKL and negatively regulates osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption. Nat Med. 2016;22(5):539–46.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4076.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zou W, Reeve JL, Iu Y, et al. DAP12 couples c-Fms activation to the osteoclast cytoskeleton by recruitment of Syk. Mol Cell. 2008;31:422–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.06.023.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mòcsai A, Humpherey MB, Van Ziffle JAG, et al. The immunomodulatory adapter proteins DAP12 and Fc receptor y-chain (FcRy) regulate development of functional osteoclasts through the Syk tyrosine kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:6158–63.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0401602101.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Koga T, Inui M, Inour L, et al. Costimulatory signals mediated by the ITAM motif cooperate with RANKL for bone homeostasis. Nature. 2004;428:758–63.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02444.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zou W, Teitelbaum SL. Absence of Dap12 and the avb3 integrin causes severe ostepetrosis. J Cell Biol. 2015;208:125–36.  https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201410123.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Johnson RA, Boyce BF, Mundy GR, et al. Tumors producing human necrosis factor induce hypercalcemia and osteoclastic bone resorption in nude mice. Endocrinology. 1989;124:1424–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pfeilschifter J, Chenu C, Bird A, et al. Interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor stimulate the formation of human osteoclastlike cells in vitro. J Bone Miner Res. 1989;4:113–8.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650040116.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Azuma Y, Kaji L, Katogi R, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-a induces differentiation of and bone resorption by osteoclasts. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:4858–64.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.275.7.4858.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kudo O, Fujikawa Y, Itonaga I, et al. Proinflammatory cytokine (TNFa/IL-1alpha) induction of human osteoclast formation. J Pathol. 2002;198:220–7.  https://doi.org/10.1002/path.1190.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lam J, Takeshita S, Barker JE, et al. TNF-a induces osteoclastogenesis by direct stimulation of macrophages exposed to permissive levels of RANK ligand. J Clin Invest. 2000;106:1481–8.  https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI11176.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    O’Gradaigh D, Ireland D, Bord S, et al. Joint erosion in rheumatoid arthritis: interactions between tumour necrosis factor a, interleukin 1, and receptor activator of nuclear factor kB ligand (RANKL) regulate osteoclasts. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63:354–9.  https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2003.008458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Novack DV, Yin L, Hagen-Stapleton A, et al. The IkB function of NF-kB2 p100 controls stimulated osteoclatogenesis. J Exp Med. 2003;198:771–81.  https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20030116.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zhao B, Grimes SN, Li S, et al. TNF-induced osteoclastogensis and inflammatory bone resorption are inhibited by transcription factor RBP-J. J Exp Med. 2012;209:319–34.  https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20111566.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mauri DN, Ebner R, Montgomery RI, et al. LIGHT, a new member of the TNF superfamily, and lymphotoxin α are ligands for herpesvirus entry mediator. Immunity. 1998;8:21–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80455-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tamada K, Shimozaki K, Chapoval AI, et al. LIGHT, a TNF-like molecule, costimulates T cell proliferation and is required for dendritic cell-mediated allogeneic T cell response. J Immunol. 2000;164:4105–10.  https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.164.8.4105.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Holmes TD, Wilson EB, Black EV, et al. Licensed human natural killer cells aid dendritic cell maturation via TNFSF14/LIGHT. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(52):E5688–96.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1411072112.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Harrop JA, Reddy M, Dede K, et al. Antibodies to TR2 (herpesvirus entry mediator), a new member of the TNF receptor superfamily, block T cell proliferation, expression of activation markers, and production of cytokines. J Immunol. 1998;161:1786–94.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kwon BS, Tan KB, Ni J, et al. A newly identified member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily with a wide tissue distribution and involvement in lymphocyte activation. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:14272–6.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.272.22.14272.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Browning JL, Miatkowski K, Sizing I, et al. Signaling through the lymphotoxin β receptor induces the death of some adenocarcinoma tumor lines. J Exp Med. 1996;183:867–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Harrop JA, McDonnell PC, Brigham-Burke M, et al. Herpesvirus entry mediator ligand (HVEM-L), a novel ligand for HVEM/TR2, stimulates proliferation of T cells and inhibits HT29 cell growth. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:27548–56.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.42.27548.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hsu H, Solovyev I, Colombero A, et al. ATAR, a novel tumor necrosis factor receptor family member, signals through TRAF2 and TRAF5. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:13471–4.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.272.21.13471.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Marsters SA, Ayres TM, Skubatch M, et al. Herpesvirus entry mediator, a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) family, interacts with members of the TNFR-associated factor family and activates the transcription factors NF-kappaB and AP-1. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:14029–32.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.272.22.14029.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Arch RH, Gedrich RW, Thompson CB. Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factors (TRAFs)—a family of adapter proteins that regulates life and death. Genes Dev. 1998;12:2821–30.  https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.12.18.2821.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Zhai Y, Guo R, Hsu TL, et al. LIGHT, a novel ligand for lymphotoxin beta receptor and TR2/HVEM induces apoptosis and suppresses in vivo tumor formation via gene transfer. J Clin Invest. 1998;102:1142–51.  https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI3492.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Rooney IA, Butrovich KD, Glass AA, et al. The lymphotoxin-beta receptor is necessary and sufficient for LIGHT-mediated apoptosis of tumor cells. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:14307–15.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.275.19.14307.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Granger SW, Rickert S. LIGHT-HVEM signaling and the regulation of T cell-mediated immunity. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2003;14:289–96.  https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI11176.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Tamada K, Shimozaki K, Chapoval AI, et al. Modulation of T-cell-mediated immunity in tumor and graft-versus-host disease models through the LIGHT co-stimulatory pathway. Nat Med. 2000;6:283–9.  https://doi.org/10.1038/73136.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Shaikh RB, Santee S, Granger SW, et al. Constitutive expression of LIGHT on T cells leads to lymphocyte activation, inflammation, and tissue destruction. J Immunol. 2001;167:6330–7.  https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.167.11.6330.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wang J, Lo JC, Foster A, et al. The regulation of T cell homeostasis and autoimmunity by T cell-derived LIGHT. J Clin Invest. 2001;108:1771–80.  https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI13827.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Colucci S, Brunetti G, Mori G, et al. Soluble decoy receptor 3 modulates the survival and formation of osteoclasts from multiple myeloma bone disease patients. Leukemia. 2009;23(11):2139–46.  https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2009.136.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ishida S, Yamane S, Nakano S, et al. The interaction of monocytes with rheumatoid synovial cells is a key step in LIGHT-mediated inflammatory bone destruction. Immunology. 2009;128:e315–24.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2567.2008.02965.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Edwards JR, Sun SG, Locklin R, et al. LIGHT (TNFSF14), a novel mediator of bone resorption, is elevated in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:1451–62.  https://doi.org/10.1002/art.21821.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Hemingway F, Kashima TG, Knowles HJ, et al. Investigation of osteoclastogenic signalling of the RANKL substitute LIGHT. Exp Mol Pathol. 2013;94:380–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexmp.2013.01.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Brunetti G, Rizzi R, Oranger A, et al. LIGHT/TNFSF14 increases osteoclastogenesis and decreases osteoblastogenesis in multiple myeloma-bone disease. Oncotarget. 2014;5(24):12950–67.  https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.2633.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Brunetti G, Faienza MF, Colaianni G, et al. Impairment of Bone Remodeling in LIGHT/TNFSF14-Deficient Mice. J Bone Miner Res. 2018;33:704–19.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3345.
  60. 60.
    Colucci S, Mori G, Brunetti G, et al. Interleukin-7 production by B lymphocytes affects the T cell-dependent osteoclast formation in an in vitro model derived from human periodontitis patients. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2005;18(3 Suppl):13–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Yao Z, Painter SL, Fanslow WC, et al. Human IL-17: a novel cytokine derived from T cells. J Immunol. 1995;155:5483–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Lubberts E, Koenders M, van den Berg WB. The role of T cell interleukin-17 in conducting destructive arthritis: lessons from animal models. Arthritis Res Ther. 2005;7:29–37.  https://doi.org/10.1186/ar1478.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Long F. Building strong bones: molecular regulation of the osteoblast lineage. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2011;13(1):27–38.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3254.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Yasuda H, Shima N, Nakagawa N, et al. Osteoclast differentiation factor is a ligand for osteoprotegerin/osteoclastogenesis-inhibitory factor and is identical to TRANCE/RANKL. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:3597–602.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Komori T, Yagi H, Nomura S, et al. Targeted disruption of Cbfa1 results in a complete lack of bone formation owing to maturational arrest of osteoblasts. Cell. 1997;89:755–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80258-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Mundlos S, Otto F, Mundlos C, et al. Mutations involving the transcription factor CBFA1 cause cleidocranial dysplasia. Cell. 1997;89:773–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80260-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Lee B, Thirunavukkarasu K, Zhou L, et al. Missense mutations abolishing DNA binding of the osteoblast-specific transcription factor OSF2/CBFA1 in cleidocranial dysplasia. Nat Genet. 1997;16:307–10.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng0797-307.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Faienza MF, Ventura A, Piacente L, et al. Osteoclastogenic potential of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in cleidocranial dysplasia. Int J Med Sci. 2014;11(4):356–64.  https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.7793.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Ducy P, Starbuck M, Priemel M, et al. A Cbfa1-dependent genetic pathway controls bone formation beyond embryonic development. Genes Dev. 1999;13:1025–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Lian JB, Javed A, Zaidi SK, et al. Regulatory controls for osteoblast growth and differentiation: role of Runx/Cbfa/AML factors. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 2004;14(1-2):1–41.  https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevEukaryotGeneExpr.v14.i12.10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Nakashima K, Zhou X, Kunkel G, et al. The novel zinc finger-containing transcription factor osterix is required for osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Cell. 2002;108:17–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00622-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Zhou X, Zhang Z, Feng JQ, et al. Multiple functions of Osterix are required for bone growth and homeostasis in postnatal mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:12919–24.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912855107.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Yang X, Matsuda K, Bialek P, et al. ATF4 is a substrate of RSK2 and an essential regulator of osteoblast biology; implication for Coffin–Lowry Syndrome. Cell. 2004;117:387–98.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00344-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Elefteriou F, Benson MD, Sowa H, et al. ATF4 mediation of NF1 functions in osteoblast reveals a nutritional basis for congenital skeletal dysplasiae. Cell Metab. 2006;4:441–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2006.10.010.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Eferl R, Wagner EF. AP-1: a double-edged sword in tumorigenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:859–68.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1209.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Eferl R, Hoebertz A, Schilling AF, et al. The Fos-related antigen Fra-1 is an activator of bone matrix formation. EMBO J. 2004;23:2789–99.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600282.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Bozec A, Bakiri L, Jimenez M, et al. Fra-2/AP-1 controls bone formation by regulating osteoblast differentiation and collagen production. J Cell Biol. 2010;190:1093–106.  https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201002111.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Jochum W, David JP, Elliott C, et al. Increased bone formation and osteosclerosis in mice overexpressing the transcription factor Fra-1. Nat Med. 2000;6:980–4.  https://doi.org/10.1038/79676.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Kveiborg M, Sabatakos G, Chiusaroli R, et al. ΔFosB induces osteosclerosis and decreases adipogenesis by two independent cellautonomous mechanisms. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:2820–30.  https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.7.2820-2830.2004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Sabatakos G, Sims NA, Chen J, et al. Overexpression of ΔFosB transcription factor(s) increases bone formation and inhibits adipogenesis. Nat Med. 2000;6:985–90.  https://doi.org/10.1038/79683.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Huelsken J, Birchmeier W. New aspects of Wnt signaling pathways in higher vertebrates. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2001;11:547–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-437X(00)00231-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Veeman MT, Axelrod JD, Moon RT. A second canon. Functions and mechanisms of β-catenin-independent Wnt signaling. Dev Cell. 2003;5:367–77.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00266-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Wu X, Tu X, Joeng KS, et al. Rac1 activation controls nuclear localization of β-catenin during canonical Wnt signaling. Cell. 2008;133:340–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.052.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Gong Y, Slee RB, Fukai N, et al. LDL receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) affects bone accrual and eye development. Cell. 2001;107:513–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00571-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Boyden LM, Mao J, Belsky J, et al. High bone density due to a mutation in LDL-receptor-related protein 5. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1513–21.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa013444.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Little RD, Carulli JP, Del Mastro RG, et al. A mutation in the LDL receptorrelated protein 5 gene results in the autosomal dominant high-bone-mass trait. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;70:11–9.  https://doi.org/10.1086/338450.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Ai M, Holmen SL, Van Hul W, et al. Reduced affinity to and inhibition by DKK1 form a common mechanism by which high bone mass-associated missense mutations in LRP5 affect canonical Wnt signaling. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:4946–55.  https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.25.12.4946-4955.2005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Semenov MV, He X. LRP5 mutations linked to high bone mass diseases cause reduced LRP5 binding and inhibition by SOST. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:38276–84.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M609509200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Ellies DL, Viviano B, McCarthy J, et al. Bone density ligand, Sclerostin, directly interacts with LRP5 but not LRP5G171V to modulate Wnt activity. J Bone Miner Res. 2006;21:1738–49.  https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.060810.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Balemans W, Ebeling M, Patel N, et al. Increased bone density in sclerosteosis is due to the deficiency of a novel secreted protein (SOST). Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10:537–43.  https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/10.5.537.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Balemans W, Patel N, Ebeling M, et al. Identification of a 52 kb deletion downstream of the SOST gene in patients with van Buchem disease. J Med Genet. 2002;39:91–7.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.39.2.91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Brunkow ME, Gardner JC, Van Ness J. Bone dysplasia sclerosteosis results from loss of the SOST gene product, a novel cystine knot-containing protein. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;68:577–89.  https://doi.org/10.1086/318811.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Staehling-Hampton K, Proll S, Paeper BW, et al. A 52-kb deletion in the SOST-MEOX1 intergenic region on 17q12-q21 is associated with van Buchem disease in the Dutch population. Am J Med Genet. 2002;110:144–52.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.10401.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Hu H, Hilton MJ, Tu X, et al. Sequential roles of Hedgehog and Wnt signaling in osteoblast development. Development. 2005;132:49–60.  https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.01564.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Rodda SJ, McMahon AP. Distinct roles for Hedgehog and canonical Wnt signaling in specification, differentiation and maintenance of osteoblast progenitors. Development. 2006;133:3231–44.  https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.02480.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Day TF, Guo X, Garrett-Beal L, et al. Wnt/β-catenin signaling in mesenchymal progenitors controls osteoblast and chondrocyte differentiation during vertebrate skeletogenesis. Dev Cell. 2005;8:739–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2005.03.016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Hill TP, Spater D, Taketo MM, et al. Canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling prevents osteoblasts from differentiating into chondrocytes. Dev Cell. 2005;8:727–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2005.02.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Qian D, Jones C, Rzadzinska A, et al. Wnt5a functions in planar cell polarity regulation in mice. Dev Biol. 2007;306(1):121–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.03.011.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Witze ES, Litman ES, Argast GM, et al. Wnt5a control of cell polarity and directional movement by polarized redistribution of adhesion receptors. Science. 2008;320(5874):365–9.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151250.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Gómez-Orte E, Sáenz-Narciso B, Moreno S, et al. Multiple functions of the noncanonical Wnt pathway. Trends Genet. 2013;29(9):545–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2013.06.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Lories RJ, Corr M, Lane NE. To Wnt or not to Wnt: the bone and joint health dilemma. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2013;9(6):328–39.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2013.25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Mikels AJ, Nusse R. Purified Wnt5a protein activates or inhibits beta-catenin-TCF signaling depending on receptor context. PLoS Biol. 2006;4(4):e115.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040115.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Benhaj K, Akcali KC, Ozturk M. Redundant expression of canonical Wnt ligands in human breast cancer cell lines. Oncol Rep. 2006;15(3):701–7.  https://doi.org/10.3892/or.15.3.701.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Tsuji K, Bandyopadhyay A, Harfe BD, et al. BMP2 activity, although dispensable for bone formation, is required for the initiation of fracture healing. Nat Genet. 2006;38:1424–9.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1916.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Kamiya N, Ye L, Kobayashi T, Mochida Y, et al. BMP signaling negatively regulates bone mass through sclerostin by inhibiting the canonical Wnt pathway. Development. 2008;135:3801–11.  https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.025825.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Kamiya N, Ye L, Kobayashi T, et al. Disruption of BMP signaling in osteoblasts through type IA receptor (BMPRIA) increases bone mass. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23:2007–17.  https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.080809.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Kamiya N, Kobayashi T, Mochida Y, et al. Wnt inhibitors Dkk1 and Sost are downstream targets of BMP signaling through the type IA receptor (BMPRIA) in osteoblasts. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25:200–10.  https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.090806.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Mishina Y, Starbuck MW, Gentile MA, et al. Bone morphogenetic protein type IA receptor signaling regulates postnatal osteoblast function and bone remodeling. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:27560–6.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M404222200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Devlin RD, Du Z, Pereira RC, et al. Skeletal overexpression of noggin results in osteopenia and reduced bone formation. Endocrinology. 2003;144:1972–8.  https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2002-220918.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Tan X, Weng T, Zhang J, et al. Smad4 is required for maintaining normal murine postnatal bone homeostasis. J Cell Sci. 2007;120:2162–70.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.03466.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Negishi-Koga T, Takayanagi H. Bone cell communication factors and Semaphorins. Bonekey Rep. 2012;1:183.  https://doi.org/10.1038/bonekey.2012.183.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Hayashi M, Nakashima T, Taniguchi M, et al. Osteoprotection by semaphorin 3A. Nature. 2012;485(7396):69–74.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11000.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Fukuda T, Takeda S, Xu R, et al. Sema3A regulates bone-mass accrual through sensory innervations. Nature. 2013;497(7450):490–3.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12115.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Negishi-Koga T, Shinohara M, Komatsu N, et al. Suppression of bone formation by osteoclastic expression of semaphorin 4D. Nat Med. 2011;17(11):1473–80.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2489.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Holmes S, Downs AM, Fosberry A, et al. Sema7A is a potent monocyte stimulator. Scand J Immunol. 2002;56:270–5.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3083.2002.01129.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Koh JM, Oh B, Lee JY, et al. Association study of semaphorin 7a (sema7a) polymorphisms with bone mineral density and fracture risk in postmenopausal Korean women. J Hum Genet. 2006;51(2):112–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10038-005-0331-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Sutton AL, Zhang X, Dowd DR, et al. Semaphorin 3B is a 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3-induced gene in osteoblasts that promotes osteoclastogenesis and induces osteopenia in mice. Mol Endocrinol. 2008;22(6):1370–81.  https://doi.org/10.1210/me.2007-0363.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Rucci N, Capulli M, Piperni SG, Cappariello A, et al. Lipocalin 2: a new mechanoresponding gene regulating bone homeostasis. J Bone Miner Res. 2015;30(2):357–68.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2341.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Boström P, Wu J, Jedrychowski MP, et al. A PGC1-α-dependent myokine that drives brown-fat-like development of white fat and thermogenesis. Nature. 2012;481:463–8.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10777.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Colaianni G, Cuscito C, Mongelli T, et al. The myokine irisin increases cortical bone mass. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:12157–62.  https://doi.org/10.1038/bonekey.2015.134.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Colaianni G, Cuscito C, Mongelli T, et al. Irisin enhances osteoblast differentiation in vitro. Int J Endocrinol. 2014;2014:902186.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/902186.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Qiao X, Nie Y, Ma Y, et al. Irisin promotes osteoblast proliferation and differentiation via activating the MAP kinase signaling pathways. Sci Rep. 2016;6:21053.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21053.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Toma CD, Ashkar S, Gray ML, et al. Signal transduction of mechanical stimuli is dependent on microfilament integrity: identification of osteopontin as a mechanically induced gene in osteoblasts. J Bone Miner Res. 1997;12(10):1626–36.  https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.10.1626.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Lin C, Jiang X, Dai Z, et al. Sclerostin mediates bone response to mechanical unloading through antagonizing Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. J Bone Miner Res. 2009;24(10):1651–61.  https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.090411.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Parfitt AM. The actions of parathyroid hormone on bone: relation to bone remodeling and turnover, calcium homeostasis, and metabolic bone disease. Part I of IV parts: mechanisms of calcium transfer between blood and bone and their cellular basis: morphological and kinetic approaches to bone turnover. Metabolism. 1976;25:809–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Martin RB, Burr DB, Sharkey NA. Skeletal tissue mechanics. New York: Springer; 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Zhang K, Barragan-Adjemian C, Ye L, et al. E11/gp38 selective expression in osteocytes: regulation by mechanical strain and role in dendrite elongation. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:4539–52.  https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.02120-05.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Hughes DE, Salter DM, Simpson R. CD44 expression in human bone: a novel marker of osteocytic differentiation. J Bone Miner Res. 1994;9:39–44.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650090106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Ohizumi I, Harada N, Taniguchi K, et al. Association of CD44 with OTS-8 in tumor vascular endothelial cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000;1497:197–203.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4889(00)00063-X.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Tanaka-Kamioka K, Kamioka H, Ris H, et al. Osteocyte shape is dependent on actin filaments and osteocyte processes are unique actin-rich projections. J Bone Miner Res. 1998;13:1555–68.  https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.10.1555.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Kamioka H, Sugawara Y, Honjo T, et al. Terminal differentiation of osteoblasts to osteocytes is accompanied by dramatic changes in the distribution of actin-binding proteins. J Bone Miner Res. 2004;19:471–8.  https://doi.org/10.1359/JBMR.040128.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Bellido T, Plotkin LI, Bruzzaniti A. In: Burr D, Allen M, editors. Bone cells in basic and applied bone biology. Waltham: Elsevier; 2014. p. 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Feng JQ, Ward LM, Liu S, et al. Loss of DMP1 causes rickets and osteomalacia and identifies a role for osteocytes in mineral metabolism. Nat Genet. 2006;38:1310–5.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1905.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Holmbeck K, Bianco P, Pidoux I, et al. The metalloproteinase MT1-MMP is required for normal development and maintenance of osteocyte processes in bone. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:147–56.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.01581.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Zhao W, Byrne MH, Wang Y, et al. Osteocyte and osteoblast apoptosis and excessive bone deposition accompany failure of collagenase cleavage of collagen. J Clin Invest. 2000;106:941–9.  https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI10158.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Qiu S, Rao DS, Palnitkar S, et al. Age and distance from the surface but not menopause reduce osteocyte density in human cancellous bone. Bone. 2002;31(2):313–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S8756-3282(02)00819-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Almeida M, Han L, Martin-Millan M, et al. Skeletal involution by age-associated oxidative stress and its acceleration by loss of sex steroids. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(37):27285–97.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M702810200.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Bivi N, Condon KW, Allen MR, et al. Cell autonomous requirement of connexin 43 for osteocyte survival: consequences for endocortical resorption and periosteal bone formation. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27(2):374–89.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.548.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Shimada T, Mizutani S, Muto T, et al. Cloning and characterization of FGF23 as a causative factor of tumor-induced osteomalacia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(11):6500–5.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.101545198.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Sitara D, Razzaque MS, Hesse M, et al. Homozygous ablation of fibroblast growth factor-23 results in hyperphosphatemia and impaired skeletogenesis, and reverses hypophosphatemia in Phex-deficient mice. Matrix Biol. 2004;23(7):421–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matbio.2004.09.007.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Feng JQ, Clinkenbeard EL, Yuan B, et al. Osteocyte regulation of phosphate homeostasis and bone mineralization underlies the pathophysiology of the heritable disorders of rickets and osteomalacia. Bone. 2013;54(2):213–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2013.01.046.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Gowen LC, Petersen DN, Mansolf AL, et al. Targeted disruption of the osteoblast/osteocyte factor 45 gene (OF45) results in increased bone formation and bone mass. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(3):1998–2007.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M203250200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Harris SE, Gluhak-Heinrich J, Harris MA, et al. DMP1 and MEPE expression are elevated in osteocytes after mechanical loading in vivo: theoretical role in controlling mineral quality in the perilacunar matrix. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2007;7(4):313–5.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Rowe PS. Regulation of bone-renal mineral and energy metabolism: the PHEX, FGF23, DMP1, MEPE ASARM pathway. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 2012;22(1):61–86.  https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevEukarGeneExpr.v22.i1.50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Yuan B, Takaiwa M, Clemens TL, et al. Aberrant Phex function in osteoblasts and osteocytes alone underlies murine X-linked hypophosphatemia. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(2):722–34.  https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI32702.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Mattinzoli D, Rastaldi MP, Ikehata M, et al. FGF23-regulated production of Fetuin-A (AHSG) in osteocytes. Bone. 2016;83:35–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2015.10.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Paic F, Igwe JC, Nori R, et al. Identification of differentially expressed genes between osteoblasts and osteocytes. Bone. 2009;45(4):682–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2009.06.010.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    Bodine PV, Billiard J, Moran RA, et al. The Wnt antagonist secreted frizzled-related protein-1 controls osteoblast and osteocyte apoptosis. J Cell Biochem. 2005;96(6):1212–30.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.20599.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    Poole KE, van Bezooijen RL, Loveridge N, et al. Sclerostin is a delayed secreted product of osteocytes that inhibits bone formation. FASEB J. 2005;19(13):1842–4.  https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.05-4221fje.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    Leupin O, Piters E, Halleux C, et al. Bone overgrowth-associated mutations in the LRP4 gene impair sclerostin facilitator function. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(22):19489–500.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.190330.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.
    Cui Y, Niziolek PJ, MacDonald BT, et al. Lrp5 functions in bone to regulate bone mass. Nat Med. 2011;17(6):684–91.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2388.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Kato Y, Windle JJ, Koop BA, et al. Establishment of an osteocyte-like cell line, MLO-Y4. J Bone Miner Res. 1997;12(12):2014–23.  https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.12.2014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  153. 153.
    Confavreux CB, Levine RL, Karsenty G. A paradigm of integrative physiology, the crosstalk between bone and energy metabolisms. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2009;310(1-2):21–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2009.04.004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  154. 154.
    Xiong J, Onal M, Jilka RL, et al. Evidence for osteocyte regulation of bone homeostasis through RANKL expression. Nat Med. 2011;17(10):1231–4.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. 155.
    Plotkin LI, Bellido T. Osteocytic signalling pathways as therapeutic targets for bone fragility. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2016;12(10):593–605.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2016.71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  156. 156.
    Kramer I, Halleux C, Keller H, et al. Osteocyte Wnt/beta-catenin signaling is required for normal bone homeostasis. Mol Cell Biol. 2010;30(12):3071–85.  https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01428-09.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  157. 157.
    Holmen SL, Zylstra CR, Mukherjee A, et al. Essential role of beta-catenin in postnatal bone acquisition. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(22):21162–8.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M501900200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  158. 158.
    Glass DA, Bialek P, Ahn JD, et al. Canonical Wnt signaling in differentiated osteoblasts controls osteoclast differentiation. Dev Cell. 2005;8(5):751–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2005.02.017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giacomina Brunetti
    • 1
  • Graziana Colaianni
    • 2
  • Silvia Colucci
    • 1
  • Maria Grano
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Basic and Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sense Organs, Section of Human Anatomy and HistologyUniversity of BariBariItaly
  2. 2.Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Section of Human Anatomy and HistologyUniversity of BariBariItaly

Personalised recommendations