Advertisement

Following the Footprints of SME Competitiveness in a High-Technology Sector

  • Luís FarinhaEmail author
  • Sharmistha Bagchi-Sen
Chapter
Part of the Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management book series (ITKM)

Abstract

This chapter examines the competitiveness footprints of SMEs within a high-tech cluster. A mixed methodology combining quantitative and qualitative data is used. More specifically, a case study is offered to show trends in innovative and entrepreneurial collaboration associated with an internationally competitive high-tech cluster. The findings shed light on the importance of collective efficiency strategies, with a focus on RD&I, implemented by SMEs that operate in an international and competitive market. This chapter highlights the lessons learned in two specific aspects: the role of innovation in the competitiveness of SMEs and the role of innovation and entrepreneurship networks in enhancing the functions of a high-technology industrial cluster, the Portuguese Engineering and Tooling Cluster.

Keywords

Innovation SMEs competitiveness Clusters RDI projects Networking Triple helix 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the employees of Pool-Net (Portuguese Tooling and Plastics Network), CENTIMFE, and OPEN Incubator for their valuable input. We would like to express our sincere thanks to Informa D&B for the data on the sector.

References

  1. Acs, Z., & Amorós, J. (2015). Entrepreneurship and development: The role of clusters. Small Business Economics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 39(3), 561–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9643-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acs, Z. J., Morck, R. K., & Yeung, B. (2001). Entrepreneurship, globalization, and public policy. Journal of International Management, 7, 235–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aiginger, K., & Vogel, J. (2015). Competitiveness : From a misleading concept to a strategy supporting beyond GDP goals. Competitiveness Review, 25(5), 497–523. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-06-2015-0052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ambastha, A., & Momaya, K. (2004). Competitiveness of firms-review of theory, frameworks and models. Singapore Management Review, 26(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.10430. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Awazu, Y. (2006). Managing technology alliances: The case for knowledge management. International Journal of Information Management, 26(6), 484–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.07.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balland, P.-A., Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2015). Proximity and innovation: From statics to dynamics. Regional Studies, 49(6), 907–920. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.883598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Camacho, J. F. (2013). In I. World (Ed.), ISTMA statistical year book: On tools, dies and moulds industry – International trade and manufacturing (5th ed.). Lisbon: ISTMA World.Google Scholar
  8. Carlsson, B., & Mudambi, R. (2003). Globalization, entrepreneurship, and public policy: A systems view. Industry & Innovation, 10(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/1366271032000068122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Castellacci, F. (2008). Innovation and the competitiveness of industries: Comparing the mainstream and the evolutionary approaches. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(7), 984–1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2007.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Centimfe. (2017). Centimfe–Market, services and projects. Retrieved by October 15, from http://www.centimfe.com.
  11. Cooke, P. (2010). Regional innovation systems: Development opportunities from the “green turn”. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(March 2013), 831–844. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2010.511156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de Andrade Régio, M. M., et al. (2016). Forecasting the disruptive skillset alignment induced by the forthcoming industrial revolution. Romanian Review Precision Mechanics, Optics & Mecatronics, 49(1), 24–29 Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=a9h&AN=117202208.Google Scholar
  13. Doganova, L., & Eyquem-Renault, M. (2009). What do business models do? Research Policy, 38(10), 1559–1570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Etzkowitz, H., & Klofsten, M. (2005). The innovating region: Toward a theory of knowledge-based regional development. R and D Management, 35(3), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2005.00387.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farinha, L., & Ferrreira, J. J. (2016). Measuring innovative and entrepreneurial networks performance. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 10(8), 2673–2682.Google Scholar
  16. Farinha, L., Ferreira, J. J., & Gouveia, J. B. (2014). Innovation and competitiveness: A high-tech cluster approach. Romanian Review Precision Mechanics, Optics & Mechatronics, 45, 41–48.Google Scholar
  17. Farinha, L., Gouveia, J. B., & Nunes, S. (2015). Drivers of global competitiveness as economic growth. In L. Farinha et al. (Eds.), Handbook of research on global competitive advantage through innovation and entrepreneurship (1st ed., pp. 13–27). Hershey: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8348-8.ch002. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farinha, L., Ferreira, J., & Gouveia, B. (2016). Networks of innovation and competitiveness: A triple helix case study. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7(1), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0218-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Felzensztein, C., et al. (2014). International marketing strategies in industrial clusters: Insights from the southern hemisphere. Journal of Business Research., Elsevier Inc., 67(5), 837–846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Flåten, B.-T., Isaksen, A., & Karlsen, J. (2015). Competitive firms in thin regions in Norway: The importance of workplace learning. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift – Norwegian Journal of Geography, 69(2), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2015.1016875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Giffi, C. A. (2013). Global manufacturing competitiveness index (p. 40). Washington: Deloitte.Google Scholar
  22. Gonçalves, V., et al. (2015). Twenty years after the porter report for Portugal. Competitiveness Review, 25(5), 540–554. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-06-2015-0059. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2017). The impact of triple helix agents on entrepreneurial innovations’ performance: An inside look at enterprises located in an emerging economy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Elsevier Inc., 119, 294–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hollanders, H., & Es-Sadki, N. (2017). In E. Commission (Ed.), Regional innovation scoreboard 2017. Washington: European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2873/469382.
  25. Informa D&B. (2013). Informa D&B Database - Portuguese industry of moulds. Lisboa.Google Scholar
  26. Isaksen, A. (2012). Regional clusters and competitiveness : The Norwegian case. European Planning Studies, 5(2), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654319708720384. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Isaksen, A., & Nilsson, M. (2013). Combined innovation policy: Linking scientific and practical knowledge in innovation systems. European Planning Studies, 21(12), 1919–1936. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.722966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Karna, A., Täube, F., & Sonderegger, P. (2013). Evolution of innovation networks across geographical and organizational boundaries: A study of R&D subsidiaries in the Bangalore IT cluster. European Management Review, 10(4), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kingsley, G., Malecki, E. J., & Malecki, J. (2011). Networking for competitiveness. Small Business Economics, 23(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SBEJ.0000026022.08180.b7. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lavine, S. (2000). Quantification and ontology. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 3, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:100525742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lawton Smith, H., & Bagchi-Sen, S. (2006). University–industry interactions: The case of the UK biotech industry. Industry & Innovation, 13(4), 371–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710601032697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lawton Smith, H., & Bagchi-Sen, S. (2012). The research university, entrepreneurship and regional development: Research propositions and current evidence. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 24(5–6), 383–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2011.592547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lechner, C., & Dowling, M. (2003). Firm networks: External relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 15(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620210159220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lee, Y. H., & Kim, Y. J. (2016). Analyzing interaction in R&D networks using the triple helix method: Evidence from industrial R&D programs in Korean government. Technological Forecasting and Social Change., Elsevier Inc., 110, 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The triple helix, quadruple helix, …, and an N-tuple of helices: Explanatory models for analyzing the knowledge-based economy? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0049-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leydesdorff, L., & Zawdie, G. (2010). The triple helix perspective of innovation systems. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(7), 789–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2010.511142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Libaers, D., & Meyer, M. (2011). Highly innovative small technology firms, industrial clusters and firm internationalization. Research Policy. Elsevier B.V., 40(10), 1426–1437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.06.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Man, T. W. Y., Lau, T., & Chan, K. F. (2002). The competitiveness of small and medium enterprises A conceptualization with focus on entrepreneurial competencies. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(June 1998), 123–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ortega Argiles, R., McCann, P., Perianez-Forte, I., Cervantes, M., Larosse, J., & Sanchez, L. (2013). Innovationdriven growth in regions: The role of smart specialisation. (OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers; Vol. 12). Paris: OECD/ODCE.Google Scholar
  40. Park, S. C. (2012). Competitiveness of east Asian science cities: Discourse on their status as global or local innovative clusters. AI and Society, 27(4), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-011-0367-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Perianez-Forte, I., & Cervantes, M. (2013). Innovation-driven growth in regions : The role of smart specialisation (Preliminary Version), 202.Google Scholar
  42. Polenske, K. R. (2004). Competition, collaboration and cooperation: An uneasy triangle in networks of firms and regions. Regional Studies, 389(November), 1029–1043. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340042000292629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Prainsack, B. (2012). Elias G. Carayannis and David F. J. Campbell, mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems: 21st-century democracy, innovation, and entrepreneurship for development. Minerva, 50(1), 139–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-012-9194-6. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shafer, S. M., Smith, H. J., & Linder, J. C. (2005). The power of business models. Business Horizons, 48(3), 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2004.10.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stejskal, J., & Hajek, P. (2012). Competitive advantage analysis: A novel method for industrial clusters identification. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 13(2), 344–365. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2011.620154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Trippl, M., & Otto, A. (2009). How to turn the fate of old industrial areas: A comparison of cluster-based renewal processes in Styria and the Saarland. Environment and Planning A, 41(5), 1217–1233. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Turok, I. (2004). Cities, regions and competitiveness. Regional Studies, 38(9), 1069–1083. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340042000292647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vaz, T. D. N., & Nijkamp, P. (2009). Knowledge and innovation: The strings between global and local dimensions of sustainable growth. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 21(4), 441–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620903020094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wacker, J. G., & Sheu, C. (2006). Effectiveness of manufacturing planning and controlsystems on manufacturing competitiveness: Evidence from global manufacturing data. International Journal of Production Research, 44(5), 1015–1036. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540500268681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative-research-from-start-to-finish. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Polytechnic Institute of Castelo Branco & NECE at University of Beira Interior, PTCovilhãPortugal
  2. 2.State University of New York – BuffaloBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations