Advertisement

The Prison-Based Model of Circles of Support and Accountability and its Application in Transitioning to the Community

  • Rosie Kitson-Boyce
Chapter
Part of the Sexual Crime book series (SEXCR)

Abstract

The barriers to successful reintegration that those convicted of sexual offences face, often lead to social isolation and prevent desistance from crime being achieved (Tewksbury & Mustaine, 2009). Of those who commit these offences, the elderly and intellectually disabled face even greater barriers, often finding the transition from prison to community the most difficult. In 2014, a prison-model of Circles of Support and Accountability (CoSA) was established to support these individuals specifically. A qualitative evaluation was commenced at the same time, involving interviews with the Core Members to explore their personal experience of the prison-based model. This chapter will explore some of the key themes derived from the data in relation to the support the prison-based model of CoSA provided the Core Members during their transition from prison to community.

Keywords

Sex offenders Reintegration Prison Re-entry CoSA 

References

  1. Aresti, A., Eatough, V., & Brooks-Gordon, B. (2010). Doing time after time: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of reformed ex-offenders’ experiences of self-change, identity and career opportunities. Psychology, Crime & Law, 16(3), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160802516273 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong, S., Chistyakova, Y., Mackenzie, S., & Malloch, M. (2008). Circles of support and accountability: Consideration of the feasibility of pilots in Scotland. Commissioned report by the Scottish government. Glasgow: SCCJR. Retrieved from www.sccjr.ac.uk
  3. Barnett, G. D., Wakeling, H. C., & Howard, P. D. (2010). An examination of the predictive validity of the risk matrix 2000 in England and Wales. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22(4), 443–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210384274 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barry, M. (2007). Listening and learning: The reciprocal relationship between worker and client. Probation Journal, 54(4), 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550507083539 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bates, A., Williams, D., Wilson, C., & Wilson, R. J. (2014). Circles south east: The first 10 years 2002–2012. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58(7), 861–885. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X13485362 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Berg, M. T., & Huebner, B. M. (2011). Re-entry and the ties that bind: An examination of social ties, employment, and recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 28(2), 382–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2010.498383 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blagden, N., Winder, B., & Hames, C. (2016). “They treat us like human beings”—Experiencing a therapeutic sex offenders prison: Impact on offenders and staff and implications for treatment. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60(4), 371–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bows, H., & Westmarland, N. (2016). Older sex offenders—Managing risk in the community from a policing perspective. Policing and Society, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2016.1138476
  9. Brocki, J. M., & Wearden, A. J. (2006). A critical evaluation of the use of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) in health psychology. Psychology and Health, 21(1), 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/14768320500230185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clarke, M., Brown, S., & Völlm, B. (2015). Circles of support and accountability for sex offenders: A systematic review of outcomes. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063215603691
  11. Craig, L. A., & Hutchinson, R. B. (2005). Sexual offenders with learning disabilities: Risk, recidivism and treatment. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 11(3), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600500273919 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crawley, E., & Sparks, R. (2005). Hidden injuries? Researching the experiences of older men in English prisons. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 44(4), 345–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.2005.00380.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crawley, E., & Sparks, R. (2006). Is there life after imprisonment? How elderly men talk about imprisonment and release. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 6(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895806060667 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cummins, R. A., & Lau, A. L. (2003). Community integration or community exposure? A review and discussion in relation to people with an intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 16(2), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-3148.2003.00157.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duwe, G. (2012). Can circles of support and accountability (COSA) work in the United States? Preliminary results from a randomized experiment in Minnesota. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 25(2), 143–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063212453942 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elliott, I. A., & Zajac, G. (2015). The implementation of circles of support and accountability in the United States. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 25, 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.07.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fazel, S., Sjöstedt, G., Långström, N., & Grann, M. (2006). Risk factors for criminal recidivism in older sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18(2), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320601800204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fox, K. J. (2015). Contextualizing the policy and pragmatics of reintegrating sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063215574711
  19. Göbbels, S., Ward, T., & Willis, G. M. (2012). An integrative theory of desistance from sex offending. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(5), 453–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.06.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Graffam, J., Shinkfield, A., Lavelle, B., & McPherson, W. (2004). Variables affecting successful reintegration as perceived by offenders and professionals. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 40(1–2), 147–171. https://doi.org/10.1300/j076v40n01_08 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(6), 1154–1163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Hanvey, S., Philpot, T., & Wilson, C. (2011). A community based approach to the reduction of sexual offending: Circles of Support and Accountability. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Hart, M. (2008). The geriatric sex offender: Senile or paedophile. Law & Psychology Review, 32, 153–162.Google Scholar
  24. Hayes, S., Shackell, P., Mottram, P., & Lancaster, R. (2007). The prevalence of intellectual disability in a major UK prison. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(3), 162–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.2007.00461.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Höing, M., Bogaerts, S., & Vogelvang, B. (2013). Circles of support and accountability: How and why they work for sex offenders. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 13(4), 267–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2013.808526 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Höing, M., Vogelvang, B., & Bogaerts, S. (2015). “I am a different man now”-sex offenders in circles of support and accountability: A prospective study. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x15612431
  27. Howse, K. (2003). Growing old in prison: A scoping study on older prisoners. London, UK: Prison Reform Trust.Google Scholar
  28. Ievins, A. (2013). Living among sex offenders: Identity, safety and relationships at Whatton prison. Masters dissertation, Cambridge University, UK.Google Scholar
  29. King, S. (2013). Assisted desistance and experiences of probation supervision. Probation Journal, 60(2), 136–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550513478320 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kitson-Boyce, R., Blagden, N., Winder, B., & Dillon, G. (2018a). ‘This time it’s different’ preparing for release through CoSA (The prison model): A phenomenological and repertory grid analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  31. Kitson-Boyce, R., Blagden, N., Winder, B., & Dillon, G. (2018b). The need for a prison-based model of circles of support and accountability: Cognitive change and the shadow of release. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  32. Lambrick, F., & Glaser, W. (2004). Sex offenders with an intellectual disability. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16(4), 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:sebu.0000043330.65936.66 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. LeBel, T. P., Burnett, R., Maruna, S., & Bushway, S. (2008). The chicken and egg’ of subjective and social factors in desistance from crime. European Journal of Criminology, 5(2), 131–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370807087640 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Levenson, J. S., Brannon, Y. N., Fortney, T., & Baker, J. (2007). Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 7(1), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.​1530-2415.2007.00119.x
  35. Lindsay, W. (2002). Research and literature on sex offenders with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 46(s1), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2788.2002.00006.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lussier, P., & Gress, C. L. (2014). Community re-entry and the path toward desistance: A quasi-experimental longitudinal study of dynamic factors and community risk management of adult sex offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2013.09.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Maguire, M., & Raynor, P. (2006). How the resettlement of prisoners promotes desistance from crime or does it? Criminology and Criminal Justice, 6(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895806060665 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marshall, W. L. (2010). The role of attachments, intimacy, and loneliness in the etiology and maintenance of sexual offending. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 25(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681990903550191 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McAlinden, A. (2006). Managing risk from regulation to the reintegration of sexual offenders. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 6(2), 197–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895806062981 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McCartan, K. (2015, October). Circles of support and accountability in the UK. Paper presented at the Association of the Treatment of Sexual Abusers 34th Annual Research and Treatment Conference, Montreal, QC, Canada.Google Scholar
  42. McCartan, K., Kemshall, H., Westwood, S., Solle, J., MacKenzie, G., & Pollard, A. (2014). Circles of Support and Accountability (CoSA): A case file review of two pilots. Ministry of Justice Analytical Summary. London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
  43. McCulloch, T. (2005). Probation, social context and desistance: Retracing the relationship. Probation Journal, 52(1), 8–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550505050623 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McNeill, F. (2009). What works and what’s just? European Journal of Probation, 1(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/206622030900100103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McNeill, F., & Weaver, E. (2010). Changing lives? Desistance research and offender management. Report No. 03/2010. Scotland: The Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research.Google Scholar
  46. Mingus, W., & Burchfield, K. B. (2012). From prison to integration: Applying modified labelling theory to sex offenders. Criminal Justice Studies, 25(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2012.657906 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nellis, M. (2009). Circles of support and accountability for sex offenders in England and Wales: Their origins and implementation between 1999–2005. British Journal of Community Justice, 7(1), 22–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580701372046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Northcutt Bohmert, M. N., Duwe, G., & Hipple, N. K. (2016). Evaluating restorative justice circles of support and accountability can social support overcome structural barriers? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X16652627
  49. Pratt, D., Piper, M., Appleby, L., Webb, R., & Shaw, J. (2006). Suicide in recently released offenders: A population-based cohort study. The Lancet, 368(9530), 119–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69002-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rocque, M., Bierie, D. M., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2011). Social bonds and change during incarceration: Testing a missing link in the re-entry research. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55(5), 816–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x10370457 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Schwaebe, C. (2005). Learning to pass: Sex offenders’ strategies for establishing a viable identity in the prison general population. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49(6), 614–625. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x05275829 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Serin, R. C., & Lloyd, C. D. (2009). Examining the process of offender change: The transition to crime desistance. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15(4), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160802261078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shaw, J. A., & Budd, E. C. (1982). Determinants of acquiescence and naysaying of mentally retarded persons. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 87, 108–110.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 51–80). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  55. Tewksbury, R. (2012). Stigmatization of sex offenders. Deviant Behavior, 33(8), 606–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2011.636690 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tewksbury, R., & Connor, D. P. (2012). Incarcerated sex offenders’ perceptions of family relationships: Previous experiences and future expectations. Western Criminology Review, 13(2), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885512467318 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tewksbury, R., & Copes, H. (2013). Incarcerated sex offenders’ expectations for re-entry. The Prison Journal, 93(1), 102–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885512467318 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tewksbury, R., & Lees, M. (2006). Perceptions of sex offender registration: Collateral consequences and community experiences. Sociological Spectrum, 26(3), 309–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732170500524246 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tewksbury, R., & Mustaine, E. E. (2009). Stress and collateral consequences for registered sex offenders. Journal of Public Management & Social Policy, 15(2), 215–239.Google Scholar
  60. Thomas, T., Thompson, D., & Karstedt. (2014). Assessing the impact of Circles of Support and Accountability on the reintegration of adults convicted of sexual offences in the community. Leeds: Centre for Criminal Justice Studies, University of Leeds.Google Scholar
  61. Thornton, D., Mann, R., Webster, S., Blud, L., Travers, R., Friendship, C., et al. (2003). Distinguishing and combining risks for sexual and violent recidivism. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989(1), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07308.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Van den Berg, C., Beijersbergen, K., Nieuwbeerta, P., & Dirkzwager, A. (2017). Sex offenders in prison: Are they socially isolated? Sexual Abuse, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063217700884
  63. Ward, T., & Langlands, R. (2009). Repairing the rupture: Restorative justice and the rehabilitation of offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14(3), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.03.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Weaver, B., & McNeill, F. (2015). Lifelines desistance, social relations, and reciprocity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(1), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814550031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Willis, G. M., & Grace, R. C. (2008). The quality of community reintegration planning for child molesters: Effects on sexual recidivism. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 20(2), 218–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063208318005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wilson, C., Bates, A., & Völlm, B. (2010). Circles of support and accountability: An innovative approach to manage high-risk sex offenders in the community. Open Criminology Journal, 3, 48–57. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874917801003010048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wilson, R. J., Picheca, J. E., & Prinzo, M. (2005). Circles of support and accountability: An evaluation of the pilot project in South-Central Ontario. Ottawa, ON: Correctional Service of Canada.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rosie Kitson-Boyce
    • 1
  1. 1.Nottingham Trent UniversityNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations