Advertisement

Images of Student Experiences on Social Media: The Case of International Branch Campuses in Dubai

  • Ummesalma Mujtaba Husein
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter offers a much-needed analysis of student experience at international branch campuses as portrayed on social media and whether the depicted experience reflects student development, the important output of higher education. This chapter aligns the social media postings of the seven primary aspects that present the determinants of students’ perceptions of quality and experience of study at international branch campuses and explores their implications on student development. The important aspect of the chapter is the focus on diverse international branch campuses, hence providing a broad-based study. The analysis provides international branch campuses with an opportunity to evaluate their social media postings against the student experience criteria.

Keywords

Student development Student experience Social media and student experience International branch campus and student experience 

References

  1. Ahmad, S.Z. (2015) Evaluating student satisfaction of quality at international branch campuses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(4), 488–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Astin, A.W. (1984) Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25(4), 297–308.Google Scholar
  3. Cabrera, A.F., Nora, A., Crissman, J.L. and Terenzini, P.T. (2002) Collaborative learning: Its impact on college students’ development and diversity. Journal of College Student Development, 43(1), 20.Google Scholar
  4. Çelik, A.K. and Akyol, K. (2015) Predicting student satisfaction with an emphasis on campus recreational sports and cultural facilities in a Turkish university. International Education Studies, 8(4), 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coleman, D. (2003) Quality assurance in transnational education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 7, 354–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cook, D.A., Levinson, A.J., Garside, S., Dupras, D.M., Erwin, P.J. and Montori, V.M. (2008) Internet-based learning in the health professions: A meta-analysis. JAMA, 300(10), 1181–1196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Daradoumis, T., Bassi, R., Xhafa, F. and Caballé, S. (2013, October) A review on massive e-learning (MOOC) design, delivery and assessment. In 2013 Eighth International Conference on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing (3PGCIC) (pp. 208–213). IEEE.Google Scholar
  8. Dobos, K. (2011) “Serving two masters”—Academics’ perspectives on working at an offshore campus in Malaysia. Educational Review, 63(1), 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Egege, S. and Kutieleh, S. (2009) Dimming down difference. In L. Dunn and M. Wallace (eds.) Teaching in transnational higher education: Enhancing learning for offshore international students (pp. 67–76). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Elliott, K.M. and Healy, M.A. (2001) Key factors influencing student satisfaction related to recruitment and retention. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 10(4), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fernandes, S., Flores, M.A. and Lima, R.M. (2012) Students’ views of assessment in project-led engineering education: Findings from a case study in Portugal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(2), 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gibson, A. (2010) Measuring business student satisfaction: A review and summary of the major predictors. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(3), 251–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gopal, A. (2011) Internationalization of higher education: Preparing faculty to teach cross-culturally. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(3), 373–381.Google Scholar
  14. Haines, D.J. (2010) The campus recreation assessment model. Recreational Sports Journal, 34(2), 130–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hattie, J. (2009) Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Henrie, C.R., Halverson, L.R. and Graham, C.R. (2015) Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review. Computers & Education, 90, 36–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hollins, E.R. (2011) Teacher preparation for quality teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(4), 395–407. Available at: https://newsroom.fb.com/company-info/. Last accessed 7 July 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hughes, R. (2011) Strategies for managing and leading an academic staff in multiple countries. New Directions for Higher Education, 2011(155), 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kang, I, Lee, K.C., Lee, S. and Choi, J. (2007) Investigation of online community voluntary behaviour using cognitive map. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lang, B. (2010, September 20) Ipsos OTX study: People spend more than half their day consuming media. Available at: http://www.thewrap.com/node/21005
  21. Lau, K., Lee, K. and Ho, Y. (2005) Text mining for the hotel industry. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 46(3), 344–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liston, C. (1998) Effects of transnational tertiary education on students: Proposing an assessment model. Available at: http://www.aair.org.au/app/webroot/media/pdf/AAIR%20Fora/Forum1998/Liston.pdf
  23. Maloney, S., Storr, M., Paynter, S., Morgan, P. and Ilic, D. (2013) Investigating the efficacy of practical skill teaching: A pilot-study comparing three educational methods. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 18(1), 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McBurnie, G. and Pollock, A. (2000) Opportunity and risk in transnational education—Issues in planning for international campus development: An Australian perspective. Higher Education in Europe, 25(3), 333–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Meyer, J.H. and Land, R. (2005) Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education, 49(3), 373–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moulding, N.T. (2010) Intelligent design: Student perceptions of teaching and learning in large social work classes. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(2), 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mujtaba, U. (2007) Part-time faculty training and development. Paper presented at the Middle East Forum for Academic Research and Reflection, GETEX, Dubai, UAE.Google Scholar
  28. Mujtaba, U. (2012) Higher education management and operational research. In G. Bell, J. Warwick and P. Galbraith (Eds.), Enhancing the student experience: Setting up the student experience unit. The Netherlands: Sense Publishers, pp. 153–166.Google Scholar
  29. Padlee, S.F., Kamaruddin, A.R. and Baharun, R. (2010) International students’ choice behavior for higher education at Malaysian private universities. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 2(2), 202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pyvis, D. and Chapman, A. (2004) Student experiences of offshore higher education: Issues for quality. Australian Universities’ Quality Agency Occasional Publication. Melbourne: AUQA.Google Scholar
  31. Swan, K., Shen, J. and Hiltz, S.R. (2006) Assessment and collaboration in online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(1), 45–62.Google Scholar
  32. Tsupros (2009). STEM: Defying a simple definition. [Blog] NSTA News. Available at: http://www.nsta.org/publications/news/story.aspx?id=59305. Last accessed 26 July 2017.
  33. Umbach, P.D. and Wawrzynski, M.R. (2005) Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 153–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Van de Ridder, J.M., Stokking, K.M., McGaghie, W.C. and Ten Cate, O.T.J. (2008) What is feedback in clinical education? Medical Education, 42(2), 189–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Van den Bergh, L., Ros, A. and Beijaard, D. (2014) Improving teacher feedback during active learning: Effects of a professional development program. American Educational Research Journal, 51(4), 772–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Walker, M. (2008) Working with college students & student development theory primer. Available from University of North Carolina Wilmington Student Affairs Professional Development Committee: http://uncw.edustudentaffairs/pdc/documents/StudentDevelopmentTheorybyM.Walker.pdf
  37. Wallace, M., Mahmud, S., Sanderson, G., Yeo, S., Briguglio, C. and Hukam-Singh, P. (2010) Moderation of assessment in transnational higher education. In IEEA 2010 (pp. 1–11). Australian International Education Conference 2010.Google Scholar
  38. Wilkins, S. (2010) Higher education in the United Arab Emirates: An analysis of the outcomes of significant increases in supply and competition. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(4), 389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilkins, S., Stephens Balakrishnan, M. and Huisman, J. (2012) Student satisfaction and student perceptions of quality at international branch campuses in the United Arab Emirates. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 34(5), 543–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ziguras, C. (2001) Educational technology in transnational higher education in South East Asia: The cultural politics of flexible learning. Educational Technology & Society, 4(4), 8–18.Google Scholar
  41. Zimitat, C. (2008) Student perceptions of the internationalisation of the undergraduate curriculum. In L. Dunn and M. Wallace (eds.) Teaching in transnational higher education: Enhancing learning for offshore international students. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ummesalma Mujtaba Husein
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BirminghamDubaiUnited Arab Emirates

Personalised recommendations