Advertisement

Implementing Psychiatric Rehabilitation in the Mental Health System Services: From Theory to Practice

  • Afzal Javed
  • Paola Carozza
Chapter
Part of the Integrating Psychiatry and Primary Care book series (IPPC)

Abstract

Psychiatric rehabilitation services incorporate principles of recovery and wellness, community support, person-centred care and active involvement of individuals and families in the behavioural health system and services. Based on the definition from the Psychiatric Rehabilitation Association (PRA, formerly USPRA), psychiatric rehabilitation:

…promotes recovery, full community integration and improved quality of life for persons who have been diagnosed with any mental health condition that seriously impairs their ability to lead meaningful lives. Psychiatric rehabilitation services are collaborative, person-directed and individualized. These services are an essential element of the health care and human services spectrum, and should be evidence-based. They focus on helping individuals develop skills and access resources needed to increase their capacity to be successful and satisfied in the living, working, learning, and social environments of their choice.

Because psychiatric rehabilitation is intended to be a person-directed and recovery-oriented service, the overall intent of this chapter is to establish broad parameters within which a variety of successful approaches can flourish, with particular reference about how the Italian field of mental health is dealing with the need of implementing rehabilitative practices in mental health services.

Keywords

Psychiatric rehabilitation Recovery Social inclusion Community adjustment Planning services Process service Staff requirements EBPs Mental health policies Psychiatric rehabilitation-oriented services Users engagement Carers engagement 

References

  1. 1.
    World Health Organization. Global Burden of Disease Report, WHO. 2008. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/estimates_country/en/index.html.
  2. 2.
    Collins PY, Patel V, Joestl SS, et al. Grand challenges in global mental health. Nature. 2011;475(7354):27–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anthony WA, Liberman RP. The practice of psychiatric rehabilitation: historical, conceptual & research base. Schizophr Bull. 1986;12:542–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rosler W. Psychiatric rehabilitation today: an overview. World Psychiatry. 2006;5(3):151–7.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davidson L, Lawless MS, Leary F. Concepts of recovery: competing or complementary. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2006;19(suppl. 6):619–24.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leamy M, Bird V, Le Boutillier C, et al. A conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis. Br J Psychiatry. 2011;199:445–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Department of Health. National Service Framework for mental health: modern standards & service models. London: Department of Health; 1996.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wykes T, Holloway F. Community rehabilitation: past failures and future prospects. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2000;12:197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Beard JH, Propst RN, Malamud TJ. The fountain house model of rehabilitation. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 1982;5:47–53.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hänninen E, Javed A, Wahlb H. Community-based rehabilitation and the Clubhouse Model as means to recovery and mental health services reform. Rehabilitación basada en la comunidad y el modelo Clubhouse como medio de recuperación y reforma de los servicios de salud mental. Rev Neuropsiquiatria. 2013;76(1):3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Javed MA, Chaudhry MR. Rehabilitation psychiatry-description of a pioneering facility in Pakistan. Int J Rehabil Res. 2000;23(4):331–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Royal College of Psychiatrists Social Inclusion Scoping Group. Mental Health and Social Inclusion: Making Psychiatry and Mental Health Services Fit for the 21st Century, Position Statement PS01/2009. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists; 2009.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sartorius N. Stigma and mental health. Lancet. 2007;370(9590):810–1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Amering M, Schmolke M. Recovery in mental health: reshaping scientific and clinical responsibilities. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Simpson EL, House AO. User and carer involvement in mental health services: from rhetoric to science. Br J Psychiatry. 2004;183(2):89–91.  https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.183.2.89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thornicroft G, Tansella M. Growing recognition of the importance of service user involvement in mental health service planning and evaluation. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2005;14(1):1–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rudnick A, Eastwood D. Psychiatric rehabilitation education for physicians. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2013;36(2):126–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pelletier JF, Tourette-Turgis C. Recovery-oriented medical training: a narrative literature review for the University of Recovery as a new concept of co-learning between patients and (future) healthcare providers. J Commun Med Health Educ. 2016;6:495.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0711.1000495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hope R. The ten essential shred capabilities: a framework for the whole of the mental health workforce. London: Department of Health; 2004. www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/08/70/04087170pdf.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wallcraft J, Amering M, Freidin J, Javed A, et al. Partnerships for better mental health worldwide: WPA recommendations on best practices in working with service users and family carers. World Psychiatry. 2011;10:229–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    World Association for Psychosocial Rehabilitation website. www.wapr.infor.
  22. 22.
    Royal College of Psychiatrists. Rehabilitation & recovery now: council report CR 121. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists; 2004.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Royal College of Psychiatrists. Royal College of Psychiatrists Position statement—Mental Health and Social Inclusion. PS01/2009, June 2009. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists; 2009.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Crawford MJ, Rutter D, Manley C, et al. Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. BMJ. 2002;325:1263–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Campbell J. In: Wallcraft J, Amering M, Schrank B, editors. Handbook of service user involvement in mental Health Research. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009. p. 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lehman AF, Steinwachs DM. Patterns of usual care for schizophrenia: initial results from the Schizophrenia Patient Outcome Research Team (PORT) Client Survey. Schizophrenia Bull. 1998a;24(1):11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kopelowicz A, Liberman RP, Wallace CJ. Psychiatric rehabilitation for schizophrenia. Int J Psychol Psychol Ther. 2003;3(2):283–98.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fassino S, Abbate Daga G, Leombruni P. Manuale di psichiatria biopsicosociale. Torino: Centro Scientifico Editore; 2007.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lehman AF, Steinwachs DM. Translating research into practice: The Schizophrenia Patient Outcome Research Team (PORT) treatment reccomendations. Schizophrenia Bull. 1998b;24(1):1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Drake RE, Goldman H, Leff HS, Lehman AF, Dixon L, Mueser K. Implementing evidence-based practices in routine mental health service settings. Psychiatr Serv. 2001;52(2):179–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Falloon IR, Held T, Roncone R, Coverdale JH, Laidlaw TM. Optimal treatment strategies to enhance recovery from schizophrenia. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1998;32(1):43–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Meuser KT, Torrey WC, Lynde L, Singer P, Drake RE. Implementing evidence-based practices for people with severe mental illness. Behav Modif J. 2008;27(3):387–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Evidence best practices toolkits. Washington, DC: Washington Press; 2008.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gingerich S, Meuser K. Illness management and recovery. Princetown: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), Centre for Mental Health Services (CMHS), and tThe Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; 2006.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ruggeri M, Dall’Agnola RB. Come valutare l’esito nei Dipartimenti di Salute Mentale. Roma: Il Pensiero Scientifico; 2000.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    World Health Organization (2001), International classification of functioning, disability and health, Geneve.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wing JK, Curtis RH, Beevor AS. HoNOS: Health of the Nation Outcome Scales: report on research and development. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists; 1996.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    McDonald-Wilson K, Henry A, Wilkniss S, Nicholson J. Assessment in psychiatric rehabilitation for planning interventions and tracking outcomes. Washington, DC: USPRA, Assessment Institute; 2007.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lasalvia A, Ruggeri M, Mazzi MA, Dall’Agnola RB. The perception of needs of care in staff and patients in community-based mental health services. The South-Verona outcome project 3. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2000;102:366–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Iowa Practice Improvement Collaborative Project, Iowa Consortium for Substance Abuse Research and Evaluation at the University of Iowa. Evidence-Based Practices: an Implementation Guide for Community-Based Substance Abuse Treatment Agencies; 2003.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Fixsen DL, Naoom SF, Blase KA, Friedman RM, Wallace F. Implementation research: a synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network; 2005.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Essock SM, Goldman HH, Van Tosh L, Anthony WA, Appell CR, Bond GR, Dixon LB, Dunakin LK, Ganju V, Gorman PG, Ralph RO, Rapp CA, Teague GB, Drake RE. Evidence-based practices: setting the context and responding to concerns. Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2003;26:919–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Carozza P. Dalla centralità dei servizi alla centralità della persona. L’esperienza di cambiemnto di un Dipartimento di salute mentale. Milano: Franco Angeli Editore; 2014.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Nordt C, Rössler W, Lauber C. Attitudes of mental health professionals toward people with schizophrenia and major depression. Schizoprehnia Bullettin. 2006;32(4):709–14.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Meeting the competency challenge in behavioral health: the resource tool for behavioral health care human resource professionals who must meet the rigorous requirements of JCAHO. Washington, DC: C & R Publications; 2000.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Hospital accreditation standards. Oakbrooke Terrace: Joint Commission Resource; 2002.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Coursey RD, Curtis L, Marsh DT, Campbell J, Harding C, Spaniol L, et al. Competencies for direct service staff members who work with adults with severe mental illnesses in outpatient public mental health/managed care systems. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2000a;23(4):378–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hoge MA, Tondora J, Marrelli AF. The fundamentals of workforce competency: implications for behavioral health. Admin Pol Ment Health. 2005;32:509–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Marrelli AF, Tondora J, Hoge MA. Strategies for developing competency models. Admin Pol Ment Health. 2005;32:540–61.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Carozza P. La psichiatria di comunità tra scienza e soggettività. Linee di pratica Clinica nei Servizi di Salute Mentale. Milano: Franco Angeli Editore; 2010.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Warwick Medical SchoolUniversity of WarwickWarwickUK
  2. 2.Mental Health Department and Addiction Services of FerraraFerraraItaly
  3. 3.Evidence–Based and Recovery-Oriented Psychosocial TreatmentsUniversity of FerraraFerraraItaly

Personalised recommendations