Advertisement

Unlocking Ability: Democracy and Disabled People’s Campaign for Recognition

  • Steven Friedman
Chapter

Abstract

The central challenge facing campaigners for the rights of disabled people can be summed up in an easily misunderstood question: how do ‘problems’ become citizens? People are, of course, not ‘problems’ but are commonly viewed as such by governments and planners. In this respect, disabled people have much in common with slum dwellers and people excluded through stigmatised health conditions like HIV/AIDS. This chapter considers the complex politics of engagement by and on behalf of excluded groups and suggests ways of reaching a more inclusive polity.

References

  1. Appadurai, A. (2002). Deep democracy: Urban governmentality and the horizon of politics. Public Culture, 14(1), 21–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baskin, J. (1991). Striking back: A history of Cosatu. Johannesburg: Ravan Press.Google Scholar
  3. Benford, R. A., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 611–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chatterjee, P. (2004). The politics of the governed: Reflections on popular politics in most of the world. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Fox Piven, F., & Cloward, R. (1979). Poor people’s movements: Why they succeed, how they fail. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  6. Friedman, S. (2010). Gaining comprehensive AIDS treatment in South Africa: The extraordinary ‘ordinary’. In J. Gaventa & R. McGee (Eds.), Citizen action (pp. 44–68). London/New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  7. Friedman, S. (2011). The perils of a shared past: Rethinking civil society strategy. Transformation, 76, 120–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Friedman, S. (2012). Democracy as an open-ended utopia: Reviving a sense of uncoerced political possibility. Theoria, 59(130), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Friedman, S., & Mottiar, S. (2005). A rewarding engagement? The Treatment Action Campaign and the politics of HIV/AIDS. Politics & Society, 33, 511–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gaventa, J., & McGee, R. (Eds.). (2010). Citizen action and national policy reform. London/New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  11. Howell, C., Chalklen, S., & Alberts, T. (2006). A history of the disability rights movement in South Africa. In B. Watermeyer, L. Swartz, T. Lorenzo, M. Schneider, & M. Priestley (Eds.), Disability and social change: A South African agenda (pp. 46–84). Cape Town: HSRC Press.Google Scholar
  12. Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC). (2014). The power of the ballot box: Public attitudes towards the right to vote: Results from the South African Social Attitudes Survey (SASAS).Google Scholar
  13. Marston, G., & Watts, R. (2003). Tampering with the evidence: A critical appraisal of evidence-based policy-making. The Drawing Board: An Australian Review of Public Affairs, 3(3), 143–163.Google Scholar
  14. Mkandawire, T. (2005, December). Targeting and universalism. In Poverty reduction: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development Social Policy and Development Programme, Paper Number 23. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
  15. Nutley, S., Davies, H., & Walter, I. (2002). Evidence based policy and practice: Cross sector lessons from the UK. ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice: Working Paper 9. Retrieved from http://www.kcl.ac.uk/sspp/departments/politicaleconomy/research/cep/pubs/papers/assets/wp9b.pdf. Accessed 22 Apr 2017.
  16. Penta, L. J. (1996). Hannah Arendt: On power. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy New Series, 10(3), 210–229.Google Scholar
  17. Priestley, M. (2006). Developing disabilities studies programmes: The international context. In B. Watermeyer, L. Swartz, T. Lorenzo, M. Schneider, & M. Priestley (Eds.), Disability and social change: A South African agenda (pp. 19–30). Cape Town: HSRC Press.Google Scholar
  18. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  19. Republic of South Africa. (1997). Constitution of the Republic of South Africa No. 108 of 1996. Retrieved from http://www.gov.za/sites/www.gov.za/files/images/a108-96.pdf. Accessed 21 Apr 2017.
  20. Republic of South Africa. (2012). Department of Basic Education report summary: Evidence based policy review workshop version 22. Retrieved from http://www.education.gov.za/Portals/0/Documents/Reports/Workshop%20Final%20Report%20on%20the%20Evidence%20Based%20workshop%20version%2022%20Nov%202012.pdf?ver=2015-02-01-140219-757. Accessed 22 Apr 2017.
  21. Riker, W., & Ordeshook, P. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review, 62, 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Taylor, C. (1994). The politics of recognition. In A. Gutmann (Ed.), Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition (pp. 25–73). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Wright Mills, C. (1956). The power elite. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Humanities FacultyUniversity of JohannesburgJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations