Advertisement

Pathways to Radicalisation and Violent Extremism

  • Thomas Marquant
  • Norbert Nedopil
Chapter

Abstract

Terrorism, or violent extremism, has become a growing concern within Europe, mostly due to several violent attacks on European soil. But not all extremism leads to violence, and ideologies rarely lead to radicalisation. What we do know, however, is the importance of forensic settings, such as prisons, when it comes to radicalisation as well as violent extremism. As such, this should be of great interest to forensic mental health workers to detect and tackle the issue in individual cases. In this chapter, we focus on the general determinants of radicalisation as well as the more individual pathways of people towards the acceptance of violent interpretations of their ideology.

References

  1. 1.
    Rapoport DC. Four waves or rebel terror and September 11. Antropoethics. 2002;8(1).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barrett R. Foreign fighters in Syria. The Soufan Group; 2014.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Europol. TE-SAT: EU terrorism situation and trend report. 25 Apr 2013.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Paz Garcia-Vera M, Sanz J. Psychopathological consequences of terrorist attacks in adult victims and their treatment: state of the question. Psychol Pap. 2016;37(3):198–204.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Björgo T, Horgan J, editors. Leaving terrorism behind: individual and collective disengagement. Abingdon: Routledge; 2009.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hannah G, Clutterbuck L, Rubin J. Rand Corporation report: radicalisation or rehabilitation: understanding the challenge of extremist and radicalised prisoners, Santa Monica, USA; 2008.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koomen W, Van Der Pligt J. The psychology of radicalization and terrorism. London: Routledge; 2016.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Esses VM, Medianu S, Lawson AS. Uncertainty, threat and the role of the media in the promoting of dehumanization of immigrants and refugees. J Soc Issues. 2013;69:518–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lancee D. Ethnic diversity in neighbourhoods and individual trust of immigrants of natives: a replication of Putnam (2007) in a western-European country. Florence: European University Institute; 2008.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pettigrew T.F., Tropp L.R. 2006 A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory J Pers Soc Psychol 90 751-783CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fair CC, Shepherd B. Who supports terrorism? Evidence from Muslim countries. Stud Confl Terrorism. 2006;29:51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Krueger AB, Maleckova J. Education, poverty and terrorism: is there a causal connection? J Econ Perspect. 2003;17:119–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Slootman M, Tillie J. Processes of radicalisation: why some Amsterdam Muslims become radicals. Amsterdam: Institute for Migration and Ethnic Studies; 2006.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pressman DE. Risk assessment decisions for violent political extremism. User report 2009–02. Public safety, Ottawa, Canada; 2009.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Monahan J. The assessment of individual risk of terrorism. Psychol Public Policy Law. 2012;18:167–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tajfel. Human groups and social categories studies in social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge university press; 1981.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, Reicher SD, Wetherell MS. Rediscovering the social group: a self-categorisation theory. Oxford: Blackwell; 1987.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dovidio JF, Gaertner SL, Saguy T. Another view of ‘we’: majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity. Eur Rev Soc Psychol. 2007;18:296–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Greenwald AG, Pettigrew TF. With malice toward none and charity to some: ingroup favoritism enables discrimination. Am Psychol. 2014;69:669–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wildschut T, Insko CA. Explanations of interindividual-intergroup discontinuity: a review of the evidence. Eur Rev Soc Psychol. 2007;18:175–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Verkuyten M, Reijerse A. Intergroup structure and identity management among ethnic minority and majority groups: the interactive effects of perceived stability, legitimacy and permeability. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2008;38:106–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Van Oudenhoven JP, Prins KS, Buunk BP. Attitudes of minority/majority members towards adaptation of immigrants. Eur J Soc Psychol. 1998;28(6):995–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gleibs IH, Noack P, Mummendey A. We are still better then them: a longitudinal field study of ingroup favoritism during a merger. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2010;40:819–36.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Smelser NJ. The faces of terrorism: social and psychological dimensions. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hogg MA, Adelman JR, Blagg RD. Religion in the face of uncertainty. An uncertainty-identity theory account of religiousness. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2010;14:72–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Güss CD, Tuason MT, Teixeira VB. A cultural-psychological theory of contemporary Islamic martyrdom. J Theory Soc Behav. 2007;37:415–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mullins CW, Young JK. Cultures of violence and acts of terror: applying a legitimation–habituation model to terrorism. Crime Delinq. 2012;58(1):28–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bergsieker HB, Shelton JN, Richeson JA. To be liked versus respected: divergent goals in interracial interactions. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010;99(2):248–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kruglanski AW, Crenschaw M, Post JM, Victoroff J. What should this fight be called? Metaphors of counterterrorism and their implications. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2009;8:97–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Taylor M, Horgan J. A conceptual framework for addressing psychological process in the development of the terrorist. Terrorrism Political Violence. 2006;18:585–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Borum R. Radicalisation into violent extremism. A review of social science theories. J Strategic Secur. 2011;4(4):7–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Borum R. Radicalisation into violent extremism. A review of conceptual models and empirical research. J Strategic Secur. 2011;4(4):37–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dean G. Neurocognitive risk assessment for the early detection of violent extremists. New York: Springer; 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Moghaddan F. From the terrorists point of view: what they experience and why they come to destroy. Westport, CT: Security International; 2006.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Silber B. Radicalisation in the west: the homegrown threat. New York: NYPD Intelligence Division; 2007.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nasser-Edine M, Garnham B, Agostino K, Caluya G. Countering violent extremism (CVE) literature review. Edinburgh, Australia; 2011.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    European expert network on terrorism issues (EENT), annual meeting. 2014.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sageman M. Understanding terror networks. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.; 2014.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Schmid A. The Routledge handbook of terrorism research. Abingdon: Routledge; 2013.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    National Crisis Centre (NCC). 2011. The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    European Union Terrorism and trend report 2016.  https://doi.org/10.2813/525171.
  42. 42.
    McCauley C, Moskalenko S. Friction: how radicalization happens to them and us. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Leuprecht C, Hataley T, Moskalenko S, McCauley C. Containing the narrative: Strategy and tactics in countering the storyline of global jihad. J Policing Intell Counter Terror. 2010;5:42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Saucier G, Akers L, Shen-Miller S, Knežević G, Stankov L. Patterns of thinking in militant extremism. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009;4:256–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Smith A. The implicit motives of terrorist groups: how the needs for affiliation and power translate into death and destruction. Polit Psychol. 2008;29:55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Weine S, Horgan J, Robertson C, Loue S, Mohamed A, Noor S. Community and family approaches to combating the radicalization and recruitment of Somali-American youth and young adults: a psychosocial perspective. Dyn Asymmetric Confl. 2009;2:181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Nibbett R, Cohen D. The culture of honor: the psychology of violence in the South. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1996.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Bosson J, Vandello J. Precarious manhood and its links to action and aggression. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2011;20:82–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ginges J, Atran S, Sachdeva S, Medin D. Psychology out of the laboratory: the challenge of violent extremism. Am Psychol. 2011;66:507–19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Tetlock P. Social functionalist frameworks for judgment and choice: intuitive politicians, theologians, and prosecutors. Psychol Rev. 2002;109:451–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Nedopil N. Prognosen in der forensischen Psychiatrie—ein Handbuch für die Praxis. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publisher; 2005.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Otto RK, Douglas KS, editors. Handbook of violence risk assessment. New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis; 2010.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Justice Department BelgiumAntwerpBelgium
  2. 2.University of Antwerp, Collaborative Antwerp Psychatric Research Institute (CAPRI)AntwerpBelgium
  3. 3.Department of Forensic PsychiatryPsychiatric Hospital of the University of MunichMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations