Advertisement

Ethical Issues in Forensic Psychiatry

  • Paul Cosyns
Chapter

Abstract

Forensic psychiatrists have the duty to provide appropriate care to mentally disordered offenders or prisoners, i.e., care comparable to those provided in regular psychiatric facilities. The psychiatrist can never disclose information of a competent patient without his consent, but exceptionally it may be necessary to protect third parties. The psychiatrist expert witness in court serves the best interest of the legal system and must inform the examinee that the confidentiality rule is not applicable in this context. Reduce as much as possible the need for coercive interventions or treatments in psychiatry.

Bibliography

  1. 1.
    Nedopil N, Gunn J, Thompson L. Teaching forensic psychiatry in Europe. Crim Behav Ment Health. 2012;22:238–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Helmchen H, Sartorius N, editors. Ethics in psychiatry, European contributions. Heidelberg: Springer; 2010.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Konrad N, Völlm B, Weisstub D, editors. Ethical issues in prison psychiatry. Dordrecht: Springer; 2013.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Green S, Bloch S, editors. An anthology of psychiatric ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gunn J, Taylor P. Forensic psychiatry: clinical, legal and ethical issues. 2nd ed. CRC Press/Taylor and Francis Group; 2014.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    European Commission. European standards on confidentiality and privacy in healthcare. EuroSOCAP Project; 2006.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Council of Europe. Draft Recommendation Rec(2004) of the Committee of Ministers to member states concerning the protection of the human rights and dignity of persons with mental disorder and Draft Explanatory report (adopted on 22 September 2004). 2004. www.coe.int.
  8. 8.
    CPT Standards: 71/72. www.cpt.coe.int/.
  9. 9.
    Konrad N. Conclusion. In: Konrad N, Völlm B, Weisstub D, editors. Ethical issues in prison psychiatry. Dordrecht: Springer; 2013. p. 415–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Munetz MR, Galon PA, Frese FJ. The ethics of mandatory community treatment. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2003;31:173–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cosyns P, Goethals K. Penitentiary mental health care in Belgium. In: Konrad N, et al., editors. Ethical issues in prison psychiatry. International library of ethics, law and the new medicine, vol. 46. Dordrecht: Springer; 2013. p. 145–51.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0086-4_7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Cosyns
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesCollaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute (CAPRI), Antwerp University Hospital, University Forensic Centre (UFC) and University of AntwerpEdegem/WilrijkBelgium

Personalised recommendations