Abstract
Assessing the level of violence risk is a vital task for mental health professionals working with offenders and (forensic) psychiatric patients. Many tools are available to aid the assessment process, each with a specific focus and purpose. Especially the structured professional judgement risk assessment tools are considered useful in guiding clinical practice and decision-making. In addition to assessing static and dynamic risk factors, the assessment would benefit from also incorporating the evaluation of strengths. These protective factors offer further insight into current functioning and the likelihood of violent behaviour. Moreover, they provide promising treatment targets. A well-balanced assessment including historical and changeable risk factors as well as protective factors should result in an insightful overview of the most important factors relevant for the violence risk potential of a specific individual in his or her assessed context. This assessment leads to a better understanding of future violence risk, conclusions regarding the level of risk and security needed and recommendations for intervention and risk management. Final conclusions drawn from the assessment should be made according to risk scenario narratives regarding the specific type of violent behaviour that seems most likely and that needs to be prevented for the individual case through tailored intervention. A case example is provided to demonstrate the use of a combined risk- and strength-based assessment in clinical practice. The chapter concludes with general recommendations regarding the organization of the risk assessment process and the incorporation of risk assessment and risk management in daily forensic care.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Douglas KS, Hart SD, Webster CD, Belfrage H. HCR-20V3: assessing risk of violence—user guide. Burnaby: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University; 2013.
Skeem JL, Monahan J. Current directions in violence risk assessment. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2011;20:38–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410397271.
Guy LS, Packer IK, Warnken W. Assessing risk of violence using structured professional judgment guidelines. J Forensic Psychol Pract. 2012;12:270–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2012.674471.
Grove WM, Meehl PE. Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: the clinical–statistical controversy. Psychol Public Policy Law. 1996;2:293. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.2.2.293.
Douglas KS, Reeves KA. Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20 (HCR-20) violence risk assessment scheme: rationale, application, and empirical overview. In: Otto RK, Douglas KS, editors. Handbook of violence risk assessment: international perspectives on forensic mental health. New York: Routledge; 2010. p. 147–85.
Hanson RK, Helmus LM, Harris AJ. Assessing the risk and needs of supervised sexual offenders a prospective study using STABLE-2007, static-99R, and static-2002R. Crim Justice Behav. 2015;42:1205–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815602094.
Andrews DA, Bonta J. The level of service inventory-revised (LSI-R). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems; 1995.
Andrews DA, Bonta J, Wormith SJ. The level of service/case management inventory (LS/CMI). Toronto: Multi-24 Health Systems; 2004.
Hoge RD, Andrews DA. Youth level of service/case management inventory 2.0 (YLS/CMI 2.0): user’s manual. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems; 2011.
Harris GT, Rice ME, Quinsey VL. Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: the development of a statistical prediction instrument. Crim Justice Behav. 1993;20:315–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854893020004001.
Monahan J, Steadman HJ, Appelbaum PS, Grisso T, Mulvey EP, Roth LH, et al. COVR–classification of violence risk: professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2005.
Quinsey VL, Harris GT, Rice ME, Cormier CA. Violent offenders: appraising and managing risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1998.
Hanson RK, Thornton D. Static 99: improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders, vol. 2. Ottawa: Solicitor General Canada; 1999.
Hanson RK, Thornton D. Notes on the development of the Static-2002. Ottawa: Public Works and Government Services Canada; 2002.
Fernandez Y, Harris AJR, Hanson RK, Sparks J. STABLE-2007 coding manual: revised 2012. Ottawa: Public Safety Canada; 2012.
Hanson RK, Harris AJR. Acute-2007 coding manual. Ottawa: Her Majesty The Queen in Right of Canada; 2012.
Douglas KS, Blanchard AJE, Hendry MC. Violence risk assessment and management: putting structured professional judgment into practice. In: Logan C, Johnstone L, editors. Managing clinical risk: a guide to effective practice. London: Routledge; 2013. p. 29–55.
de Vogel V, de Vries Robbé M. Adapting risk assessment tools to new jurisdictions. In: Singh JP, Fazel S, Bjorkly S, editors. International perspectives on risk assessment. New York: Oxford University Press; 2016. in press.
Singh JP, Desmarais SL, Hurducas C, Arbach-Lucioni K, Condemarin C, Dean K, et al. International perspectives on the practical application of violence risk assessment: a global survey of 44 countries. Int J Forensic Ment Health. 2014;13:193–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2014.922141.
Douglas KS, Shaffer C, Blanchard AJE, Guy LS, Reeves K, Weir J. HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme: overview and annotated bibliography. HCR-20 Violence Risk Assessment White Paper Series, #1. Burnaby: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University; 2014.
de Vogel V, Nicholls TL. Gender matters: an introduction to the special issue on women and girls. Int J Forensic Ment Health. 2016;15:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2016.1141439.
Singh JP, Grann M, Fazel S. A comparative study of violence risk assessment tools: a systematic review and metaregression analysis of 68 studies involving 25,980 participants. Clin Psychol Rev. 2011;31:499–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.11.009.
Webster CD, Douglas KS, Eaves D, Hart SD. HCR-20: assessing the risk of violence (Version 2). Burnaby: Simon Fraser University and Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission of British Columbia; 1997.
Wong SCP, Gordon A. Violence risk scale (VRS). Saskatoon: Department of Psychology, University of Saskatchewan; 1999.
de Vogel V, de Ruiter C, Bouman Y, de Vries Robbé M. SAPROF: guidelines for the assessment of protective factors for violence risk. 2nd ed. Utrecht: Van der Hoeven Stichting; 2012.
de Vogel V, de Vries RM, van Kalmthout W, Place C. Female additional manual (FAMV3): additional guidelines to the HCR-20V3 for assessing risk for violence in women. Utrecht: Van der Hoeven Kliniek; 2014.
de Vogel V, de Ruiter C, Bouman Y, de Vries Robbé M. SAPROF: guidelines for the assessment of protective factors for violence risk. Utrecht: Forum Educatief; 2009.
Ogloff J, Daffern M. The dynamic appraisal of situational aggression (DASA). Melbourne: Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Monash University; 2004.
Webster CD, Martin ML, Brink J, Nicholls TL, Desmarais SL. Short-term assessment of risk and treatability (START) (Version 1.1). Coquitlam: British Columbia Mental Health and Addiction Services; 2009.
Boer DP, Hart SD, Kropp PR, Webster CD. Manual for the sexual violence risk-20: professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. Vancouver: British Columbia Institute against Family Violence; 1997.
Hart SD, Kropp PR, Laws DR, Klaver J, Logan C, Watt KA. The risk for sexual violence protocol (RSVP): structured professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. Burnaby: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University; 2003.
Wong SCP, Olver ME, Nicholaichuk TP, Gordon A. The violence risk scale: sexual offender version (VRS:SO). Saskatoon: Regional Psychiatric Centre and University of Saskatchewan; 2003.
Kropp PR, Hart SD, Webster CD, Eaves D. Spousal assault risk assessment guide (SARA): user manual. Vancouver: Multi-Health Systems Inc; 1999.
Kropp PR, Hart SD, Belfrage H. Brief spousal assault form for the evaluation of risk (B-SAFER): user manual. Vancouver: British Columbia Institute on Family Violence; 2005.
Kropp PR, Belfrage H, Hart SD. Assessment of risk for honour based violence (PATRIARCH): user manual. Vancouver: ProActive Resolutions Inc; 2013.
Cook A, Hart S, Kropp R. Multi-level guidelines for the assessment and management of group-based violence. Burnaby: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University; 2013.
Pressman DE. Risk assessment decisions for violent political extremism. Ottawa: Public Safety Canada; 2009.
Kropp PR, Hart SD, Lyon DR. Guidelines for stalking assessment and management (SAM): user manual. Vancouver: ProActive Resolutions Inc; 2008.
MacKenzie RD, McEwan TE, Pathé MT, James DV, Ogloff JRP, Mullen PE. Stalking risk profile: guidelines for assessing and managing stalkers. Melbourne: StalkInc & Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Monash University; 2009.
Agar SE. Manual for the Child Abuse Risk Evaluation (CARE). Burnaby: Simon Fraser University; 2003.
Zapf PA. Suicide assessment manual for inmates. Burnaby: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University; 2006.
Bouch J, Marshall JJ. Suicide risk: structured professional judgement. Adv Psychiatr Treat. 2005;11:84–91. https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.11.2.84.
Borum R, Bartel P, Forth A. Manual for the structured assessment for violence risk in youth (SAVRY). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2006.
de Vries Robbé M, Geers MCK, Stapel M, Hilterman ELB, de Vogel V. SAPROF—Youth version: guidelines for the assessment of protective factors for violence risk in juveniles. Utrecht: Van der Hoeven Kliniek; 2015.
Viljoen JL, Nicholls TL, Cruise KR, Desmarais SL, Webster CD. Short-term assessment of risk and treatability: adolescent version (START:AV) user guide. Burnaby: Mental Health, Law and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University; 2014.
Prentky R, Righthand S. Juvenile sex offender assessment protocol-II (J-SOAP-II) manual. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention; 2003.
Augimeri LK, Koegl CJ, Webster CD, Levene KS. Early assessment risk list for boys: EARL-20B, Version 2. Toronto: Earlscourt Child and Family Centre; 2001.
Levene KS, Augimeri LK, Pepler DJ, Walsh MM, Webster CD, Koegl CJ. Early assessment risk list for girls: EARL-21G, Version 1, Consultation Edition. Toronto: Earlscourt Child and Family Center; 2001.
Rogers R. The uncritical acceptance of risk assessment in forensic practice. Law Hum Behav. 2000;24:595–605. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005575113507.
de Vries Robbé M. Protective factors: validation of the structured assessment of protective factors for violence risk in forensic psychiatry. Utrecht: Van der Hoeven Kliniek; 2014. www.saprof.com.
de Vogel V, de Ruiter C. Structured Professional Judgment of violence risk in forensic clinical practice: a prospective study into the predictive validity of the Dutch HCR-20. Psychol Crime Law. 2006;12:321–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160600569029.
Haque Q, Webster CD. Structured professional judgement and sequential redirections. Crim Behav Ment Health. 2013;23:241–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.1886.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Vries Robbé, M., de Vogel, V. (2018). A European Perspective on Risk Assessment Tools. In: Goethals, K. (eds) Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology in Europe. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74664-7_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74664-7_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74662-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74664-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)